Lin-jun Li1, Qing-chen Wu2, Cheng Zhang1, Min Zhang1, Li Qiang1, Ying-jiu Jiang1, Dan Chen1. 1. Department of Cardiothoracic Surgery, First Affiliated Hospital, Chongqing Medical University, Chongqing 400016, China. 2. Department of Cardiothoracic Surgery, First Affiliated Hospital, Chongqing Medical University, Chongqing 400016, China. Email: wuqc6@hotmail.com.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: To explore the effects of reconstructing method (narrow gastric tube (NGT) versus whole stomach (WS)) on health-related quality of life (HRQL) in patients during a 3-year follow-up. METHODS: In a prospective randomized single-center study from 2007 to 2008, 104 patients underwent esophagectomy for cancer. They were divided into NGT (n = 52) and WS (n = 52) groups. To assess HRQL, a questionnaire in references to EORTC-QLQ-C30 and QLQ-OES18 was administered at 3 weeks, 6 months, 1 year, 2 year and 3 years post-operation. Their clinical data were collected prospectively and follow-up was performed regularly. RESULTS: The patients in the NGT group reported significantly (P < 0.05) better average scores of HRQL at both 6 months and 1 year.However, no significant difference in average scores of HRQL was found at 3 years. Patients in the NGT group reported significantly (P < 0.05) better scores of reflux at 3 weeks, 6 months and 1 year.Nausea was the only item with significant difference on HRQL at 2 years and 3 years.No significant difference existed between two groups with regards to cumulative survival rate at 3 years. CONCLUSION: No significant difference existed between two groups with regards to cumulative survival rate at 3 years. The patients with gastric tube reconstruction after oncologic esophagectomy present better HRQL.Further studies are warranted to perform survival analysis beyond 3 year post-operation.
RCT Entities:
OBJECTIVE: To explore the effects of reconstructing method (narrow gastric tube (NGT) versus whole stomach (WS)) on health-related quality of life (HRQL) in patients during a 3-year follow-up. METHODS: In a prospective randomized single-center study from 2007 to 2008, 104 patients underwent esophagectomy for cancer. They were divided into NGT (n = 52) and WS (n = 52) groups. To assess HRQL, a questionnaire in references to EORTC-QLQ-C30 and QLQ-OES18 was administered at 3 weeks, 6 months, 1 year, 2 year and 3 years post-operation. Their clinical data were collected prospectively and follow-up was performed regularly. RESULTS: The patients in the NGT group reported significantly (P < 0.05) better average scores of HRQL at both 6 months and 1 year.However, no significant difference in average scores of HRQL was found at 3 years. Patients in the NGT group reported significantly (P < 0.05) better scores of reflux at 3 weeks, 6 months and 1 year.Nausea was the only item with significant difference on HRQL at 2 years and 3 years.No significant difference existed between two groups with regards to cumulative survival rate at 3 years. CONCLUSION: No significant difference existed between two groups with regards to cumulative survival rate at 3 years. The patients with gastric tube reconstruction after oncologic esophagectomy present better HRQL.Further studies are warranted to perform survival analysis beyond 3 year post-operation.