Literature DB >> 24359925

Metal speciation and potential bioavailability changes during discharge and neutralisation of acidic drainage water.

Stuart L Simpson1, Christopher R Vardanega2, Chad Jarolimek3, Dianne F Jolley4, Brad M Angel3, Luke M Mosley5.   

Abstract

The discharge of acid drainage from the farm irrigation areas to the Murray River in South Australia represents a potential risk to water quality. The drainage waters have low pH (2.9-5.7), high acidity (up to 1190 mg L(-1) CaCO3), high dissolved organic carbon (10-40 mg L(-1)), and high dissolved Al, Co, Ni and Zn (up to 55, 1.25, 1.30 and 1.10 mg L(-1), respectively) that represent the greatest concern relative to water quality guidelines (WQGs). To provide information on bioavailability, changes in metal speciation were assessed during mixing experiments using filtration (colloidal metals) and Chelex-lability (free metal ions and weak inorganic metal complexes) methods. Following mixing of drainage and river water, much of the dissolved aluminium and iron precipitated. The concentrations of other metals generally decreased conservatively in proportion to the dilution initially, but longer mixing periods caused increased precipitation or adsorption to particulate phases. Dissolved Co, Mn and Zn were typically 95-100% present in Chelex-labile forms, whereas 40-70% of the dissolved nickel was Chelex-labile and the remaining non-labile fraction of dissolved nickel was associated with fine colloids or complexed by organic ligands that increased with time. Despite the different kinetics of precipitation, adsorption and complexation reactions, the dissolved metal concentrations were generally highly correlated for the pooled data sets, indicating that the major factors controlling the concentrations were similar for each metal (pH, dilution, and time following mixing). For dilutions of the drainage waters of less than 1% with Murray River water, none of the metals should exceed the WQGs. However, the high concentrations of metals associated with fine precipitates within the receiving waters may represent a risk to some aquatic organisms. Crown
Copyright © 2013. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Acid sulfate soils; Dairy farm; Ecotoxicology; Murray River; Risk assessment; Water quality guidelines

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2013        PMID: 24359925     DOI: 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2013.11.059

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Chemosphere        ISSN: 0045-6535            Impact factor:   7.086


  5 in total

1.  The capacity of biochar made from common reeds to neutralise pH and remove dissolved metals in acid drainage.

Authors:  Luke M Mosley; Philip Willson; Benjamin Hamilton; Greg Butler; Russell Seaman
Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int       Date:  2015-05-26       Impact factor: 4.223

2.  Combined effects of water flow and copper concentration on the feeding behavior, growth rate, and accumulation of copper in tissue of the infaunal polychaete Polydora cornuta.

Authors:  Marienne A Colvin; Brian T Hentschel; Dimitri D Deheyn
Journal:  Ecotoxicology       Date:  2016-09-20       Impact factor: 2.823

3.  Organic materials retain high proportion of protons, iron and aluminium from acid sulphate soil drainage water with little subsequent release.

Authors:  Tan Dang; Luke M Mosley; Rob Fitzpatrick; Petra Marschner
Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int       Date:  2016-09-10       Impact factor: 4.223

4.  Speciation and precipitation of heavy metals in high-metal and high-acid mine waters from the Iberian Pyrite Belt (Portugal).

Authors:  Nuno Durães; Iuliu Bobos; Eduardo Ferreira da Silva
Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int       Date:  2016-12-12       Impact factor: 4.223

5.  De novo assembly and analysis of changes in the protein-coding transcriptome of the freshwater shrimp Paratya australiensis (Decapoda: Atyidae) in response to acid sulfate drainage water.

Authors:  Peter A Bain; Adrienne L Gregg; Anupama Kumar
Journal:  BMC Genomics       Date:  2016-11-07       Impact factor: 3.969

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.