Literature DB >> 24359922

Effect of coal combustion fly ash use in concrete on the mass transport release of constituents of potential concern.

Andrew C Garrabrants1, David S Kosson2, Rossane DeLapp1, Hans A van der Sloot3.   

Abstract

Concerns about the environmental safety of coal combustion fly ash use as a supplemental cementitious material have necessitated comprehensive evaluation of the potential for leaching concrete materials containing fly ash used as a cement replacement. Using concrete formulations representative of US residential and commercial applications, test monoliths were made without fly ash replacement (i.e., controls) and with 20% or 45% of the portland cement fraction replaced by fly ash from four coal combustion sources. In addition, microconcrete materials were created with 45% fly ash replacement based on the commercial concrete formulation but with no coarse aggregate and an increased fine aggregate fraction to maintain aggregate-paste interfacial area. All materials were cured for 3 months prior to mass transport-based leach testing of constituents of potential concern (i.e., Sb, As, B, Ba, Cd, Cr, Mo, Pb, Se, Tl and V) according to EPA Method 1315. The cumulative release results were consistent with previously tested samples of concretes and mortars from international sources. Of the 11 constituents tested, only Sb, Ba, B, Cr and V were measured in quantifiable amounts. Microconcretes without coarse aggregate were determined to be conservative surrogates for concrete in leaching assessment since cumulative release from microconcretes were only slightly greater than the associated concrete materials. Relative to control materials without fly ash, concretes and microconcretes with fly ash replacement of cement had increased 28-d and 63-d cumulative release for a limited number 10 comparison cases: 2 cases for Sb, 7 cases for Ba and 1 case for Cr. The overall results suggest minimal leaching impact from fly ash use as a replacement for up to 45% of the cement fraction in typical US concrete formulations; however, scenario-specific assessment based on this leaching evaluation should be used to determine if potential environmental impacts exist.
Copyright © 2013 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Coal combustion fly ash; Concrete; Leaching environmental assessment framework; Mass transport; Microconcrete

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2013        PMID: 24359922     DOI: 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2013.11.048

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Chemosphere        ISSN: 0045-6535            Impact factor:   7.086


  4 in total

1.  Performance of desulfurization ash for the preparation of grouting fire prevention material.

Authors:  Xiang-Hua Feng; Chao-Qiang Wang; Shi-Min Ding
Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int       Date:  2019-05-08       Impact factor: 4.223

2.  PAHs in leachates from thermal power plant wastes and ash-based construction materials.

Authors:  Natalya Irha; Janek Reinik; Jekaterina Jefimova; Arina Koroljova; Lembi-Merike Raado; Tiina Hain; Mai Uibu; Rein Kuusik
Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int       Date:  2015-04-14       Impact factor: 4.223

3.  Sustainability, Eco-Point and Engineering Performance of Different Workability OPC Fly-Ash Mortar Mixes.

Authors:  Putri Zulaiha Razi; Hashim Abdul Razak; Nur Hafizah A Khalid
Journal:  Materials (Basel)       Date:  2016-05-06       Impact factor: 3.623

Review 4.  Pruning chemicals from the green building landscape.

Authors:  Lisa J Goodwin Robbins; Kathryn M Rodgers; Bill Walsh; Rachelle Ain; Robin E Dodson
Journal:  J Expo Sci Environ Epidemiol       Date:  2019-10-07       Impact factor: 5.563

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.