Literature DB >> 24358718

Altered precipitation regime affects the function and composition of soil microbial communities on multiple time scales.

L H Zeglin1, P J Bottomley2, A Jumpponen3, C W Rice4, M Arango4, A Lindsley2, A McGowan4, P Mfombep4, D D Myrold2.   

Abstract

Climate change models predict that future precipitation patterns will entail lower-frequency but larger rainfall events, increasing the duration of dry soil conditions. Resulting shifts in microbial C cycling activity could affect soil C storage. Further, microbial response to rainfall events may be constrained by the physiological or nutrient limitation stress of extended drought periods; thus seasonal or multiannual precipitation regimes may influence microbial activity following soil wet-up. We quantified rainfall-driven dynamics of microbial processes that affect soil C loss and retention, and microbial community composition, in soils from a long-term (14-year) field experiment contrasting "Ambient" and "Altered" (extended intervals between rainfalls) precipitation regimes. We collected soil before, the day following, and five days following 2.5-cm rainfall events during both moist and dry periods (June and September 2011; soil water potential = -0.01 and -0.83 MPa, respectively), and measured microbial respiration, microbial biomass, organic matter decomposition potential (extracellular enzyme activities), and microbial community composition (n class="Chemical">phospholipid fatty acids). The equivalent rainfall events caused equivalent microbial respiration responses in both treatments. In contrast, microbial biomass was higher and increased after rainfall in the Altered treatment soils only, thus microbial C use efficiency (CUE) was higher in Altered than Ambient treatments (0.70 +/- 0.03 > 0.46 +/- 0.10). CUE was also higher in dry (September) soils. C-acquiring enzyme activities (beta-glucosidase, cellobiohydrolase, and phenol oxidase) increased after rainfall in moist (June), but not dry (September) soils. Both microbial biomass C:N ratios and fungal:bacterial ratios were higher at lower soil water contents, suggesting a functional and/or population-level shift in the microbiota at low soil water contents, and microbial community composition also differed following wet-up and between seasons and treatments. Overall, microbial activity may directly (C respiration) and indirectly (enzyme potential) reduce soil organic matter pools less in drier soils, and soil C sequestration potential (CUE) may be higher in soils with a history of extended dry periods between rainfall events. The implications include that soil C loss may be reduced or compensated for via different mechanisms at varying time scales, and that microbial taxa with better stress tolerance or growth efficiency may be associated with these functional shifts.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2013        PMID: 24358718     DOI: 10.1890/12-2018.1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ecology        ISSN: 0012-9658            Impact factor:   5.499


  13 in total

1.  An assessment of diurnal water uptake in a mesic prairie: evidence for hydraulic lift?

Authors:  Kimberly O'Keefe; Jesse B Nippert
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  2017-02-02       Impact factor: 3.225

2.  Season-Long Experimental Drought Alters Fungal Community Composition but Not Diversity in a Grassland Soil.

Authors:  Philipp-André Schmidt; Imke Schmitt; Jürgen Otte; Cornelia Bandow; Jörg Römbke; Miklós Bálint; Gregor Rolshausen
Journal:  Microb Ecol       Date:  2017-08-07       Impact factor: 4.552

3.  Historical Drought Affects Microbial Population Dynamics and Activity During Soil Drying and Re-Wet.

Authors:  Allison M Veach; Lydia H Zeglin
Journal:  Microb Ecol       Date:  2019-09-03       Impact factor: 4.552

4.  Depth matters: effects of precipitation regime on soil microbial activity upon rewetting of a plant-soil system.

Authors:  Ilonka C Engelhardt; Amy Welty; Steven J Blazewicz; David Bru; Nadine Rouard; Marie-Christine Breuil; Arthur Gessler; Lucía Galiano; José Carlos Miranda; Aymé Spor; Romain L Barnard
Journal:  ISME J       Date:  2018-02-23       Impact factor: 10.302

5.  Belowground Response to Drought in a Tropical Forest Soil. II. Change in Microbial Function Impacts Carbon Composition.

Authors:  Nicholas J Bouskill; Tana E Wood; Richard Baran; Zhao Hao; Zaw Ye; Ben P Bowen; Hsiao Chien Lim; Peter S Nico; Hoi-Ying Holman; Benjamin Gilbert; Whendee L Silver; Trent R Northen; Eoin L Brodie
Journal:  Front Microbiol       Date:  2016-03-15       Impact factor: 5.640

6.  Dominant Trees in a Subtropical Forest Respond to Drought Mainly via Adjusting Tissue Soluble Sugar and Proline Content.

Authors:  Yuanwen Kuang; Yimin Xu; Lingling Zhang; Enqing Hou; Weijun Shen
Journal:  Front Plant Sci       Date:  2017-05-15       Impact factor: 5.753

7.  Metaphenomic Responses of a Native Prairie Soil Microbiome to Moisture Perturbations.

Authors:  Taniya Roy Chowdhury; Joon-Yong Lee; Eric M Bottos; Colin J Brislawn; Richard Allen White; Lisa M Bramer; Joseph Brown; Jeremy D Zucker; Young-Mo Kim; Ari Jumpponen; Charles W Rice; Sarah J Fansler; Thomas O Metz; Lee Ann McCue; Stephen J Callister; Hyun-Seob Song; Janet K Jansson
Journal:  mSystems       Date:  2019-06-11       Impact factor: 6.496

8.  Precipitation overrides warming in mediating soil nitrogen pools in an alpine grassland ecosystem on the Tibetan Plateau.

Authors:  Li Lin; Biao Zhu; Chengrong Chen; Zhenhua Zhang; Qi-Bing Wang; Jin-Sheng He
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2016-08-16       Impact factor: 4.379

9.  Hydrological legacy determines the type of enzyme inhibition in a peatlands chronosequence.

Authors:  Samuel Alexander Festing Bonnett; Edward Maltby; Chris Freeman
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2017-08-30       Impact factor: 4.379

10.  Effects of Short- and Long-Term Variation in Resource Conditions on Soil Fungal Communities and Plant Responses to Soil Biota.

Authors:  Philip G Hahn; Lorinda Bullington; Beau Larkin; Kelly LaFlamme; John L Maron; Ylva Lekberg
Journal:  Front Plant Sci       Date:  2018-11-06       Impact factor: 5.753

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.