Linda Bryans1, Andrew D Palmer1, Joshua S Schindler1, Peter E Andersen2, James I Cohen2. 1. Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Northwest Clinic for Voice and Swallowing, Oregon Health and Science University, Portland, OR 97239, USA. 2. Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Oregon Health and Science University, Portland, OR 97239, USA.
Abstract
OBJECTIVES: We compared the voice outcomes after cricotracheal resection (CTR) and airway dilation in adult women. METHODS: We performed long-term comprehensive voice assessments in 23 adult women treated for laryngotracheal stenosis, including acoustic and perceptual measurements of voice, videostroboscopy, the Voice Handicap Index, and an open-ended subjective questionnaire. RESULTS: Voice measures were abnormal in both groups. Objective pitch and loudness measurements were significantly more impaired after CTR than after dilation. Perceptual ratings of voice were worse after CTR than after dilation, particularly with regard to breathiness, pitch, and loudness. The CTR group was more likely to report a voice disorder, reported significantly more voice symptoms, and had higher voice handicap scores. Videostroboscopy was frequently abnormal in both groups, with more evidence of vocal hyperfunction after CTR. Self-ratings of breathing and swallowing were generally high in both groups, but voice satisfaction was rated lower after CTR. CONCLUSIONS: Voice was more significantly negatively impacted by CTR than by dilation. Surprisingly, many individuals in both groups reported improvements--a finding that possibly highlights the impact of laryngotracheal stenosis on airflow and vocal function before surgery. The importance of patient selection and preoperative counseling is emphasized, along with the potential need for voice therapy.
OBJECTIVES: We compared the voice outcomes after cricotracheal resection (CTR) and airway dilation in adult women. METHODS: We performed long-term comprehensive voice assessments in 23 adult women treated for laryngotracheal stenosis, including acoustic and perceptual measurements of voice, videostroboscopy, the Voice Handicap Index, and an open-ended subjective questionnaire. RESULTS: Voice measures were abnormal in both groups. Objective pitch and loudness measurements were significantly more impaired after CTR than after dilation. Perceptual ratings of voice were worse after CTR than after dilation, particularly with regard to breathiness, pitch, and loudness. The CTR group was more likely to report a voice disorder, reported significantly more voice symptoms, and had higher voice handicap scores. Videostroboscopy was frequently abnormal in both groups, with more evidence of vocal hyperfunction after CTR. Self-ratings of breathing and swallowing were generally high in both groups, but voice satisfaction was rated lower after CTR. CONCLUSIONS: Voice was more significantly negatively impacted by CTR than by dilation. Surprisingly, many individuals in both groups reported improvements--a finding that possibly highlights the impact of laryngotracheal stenosis on airflow and vocal function before surgery. The importance of patient selection and preoperative counseling is emphasized, along with the potential need for voice therapy.
Authors: Kristine Tanner; Christopher Dromey; Mark L Berardi; Lisa M Mattei; Jenny L Pierce; Jonathan J Wisco; Eric J Hunter; Marshall E Smith Journal: Laryngoscope Date: 2016-11-24 Impact factor: 3.325
Authors: James J Daniero; Dale C Ekbom; Alexander Gelbard; Lee M Akst; Alexander T Hillel Journal: JAMA Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg Date: 2017-06-01 Impact factor: 6.223
Authors: Ph Monnier; F G Dikkers; H Eckel; C Sittel; C Piazza; G Campos; M Remacle; G Peretti Journal: Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol Date: 2015-05-08 Impact factor: 2.503
Authors: Alexander Gelbard; Nicolas-George Katsantonis; Masanobu Mizuta; Dawn Newcomb; Joseph Rotsinger; Bernard Rousseau; James J Daniero; Eric S Edell; Dale C Ekbom; Jan L Kasperbauer; Alexander T Hillel; Liying Yang; C Gaelyn Garrett; James L Netterville; Christopher T Wootten; David O Francis; Charles Stratton; Kevin Jenkins; Tracy L McGregor; Jennifer A Gaddy; Timothy S Blackwell; Wonder P Drake Journal: Laryngoscope Date: 2016-06-14 Impact factor: 3.325
Authors: Alexander Gelbard; Donald T Donovan; Julina Ongkasuwan; S A R Nouraei; Guri Sandhu; Michael S Benninger; Paul C Bryson; Robert R Lorenz; William S Tierney; Alexander T Hillel; Shekhar K Gadkaree; David G Lott; Eric S Edell; Dale C Ekbom; Jan L Kasperbauer; Fabien Maldonado; Joshua S Schindler; Marshall E Smith; James J Daniero; C Gaelyn Garrett; James L Netterville; Otis B Rickman; Robert J Sinard; Christopher T Wootten; David O Francis Journal: Laryngoscope Date: 2015-11-04 Impact factor: 3.325
Authors: Simone T Timman; Christiana Schoemaker; Wilson W L Li; Henri A M Marres; Jimmie Honings; Wim J Morshuis; Erik H F M van der Heijden; Ad F T M Verhagen Journal: Ann Cardiothorac Surg Date: 2018-03
Authors: Alexander Gelbard; Yu Shyr; Lynne Berry; Alexander T Hillel; Dale C Ekbom; Eric S Edell; Jan L Kasperbauer; David G Lott; Donald T Donovan; C Gaelyn Garrett; Guri Sandhu; James J Daniero; James L Netterville; Josh S Schindler; Marshall E Smith; Paul C Bryson; Robert R Lorenz; David O Francis Journal: BMJ Open Date: 2018-04-10 Impact factor: 2.692