Literature DB >> 24358480

Risk factors for incomplete bladder emptying after midurethral sling.

Peggy A Norton, Charles W Nager, Toby C Chai, Elizabeth Mueller, Anne Stoddard, Jerry Lowder, Edward Varner, Gary Lemack.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To describe the prevalence and risk factors for incomplete bladder emptying after midurethral slings (MUS) in a large multicenter trial.
METHODS: Five hundred ninety-seven women were randomized to retropubic (RMUS) or transobturator midurethral slings as part of the Trial of MidUrethral Slings study. Demographic data and voiding symptoms were obtained preoperatively along with urodynamics. Patients underwent a standardized voiding trial at discharge after continence surgery. Incomplete bladder emptying was defined as a postvoid residual of >150 mL.
RESULTS: Three-quarters of patients (454 of 597) were self-voiding at discharge, whereas 114 of 597 (19%) were managed with an indwelling urethral catheter and 29 of 597 (5%) with intermittent catheterization. At 2 weeks, only 38 of 586 (6%) reported any catheter use, and by 6 weeks, only 9 of 587 (2%) reported any catheter use. Women with incomplete bladder emptying at discharge were more likely to have had a RMUS (odds ratio 1.79; 95% confidence interval 1.22-2.62) and to report preoperative voiding accommodations such as straining to void (odds ratio 1.75; 95% confidence interval 1.04-2.96). Urodynamic and clinicodemographic parameters were not predictive of incomplete bladder emptying.
CONCLUSION: Incomplete bladder emptying at discharge after MUS is common, especially after RMUS, but of short duration. Risk factors include preoperative voiding accommodations such as straining or bending over to void, but other variables including urodynamics did not predict incomplete bladder emptying after MUS.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 24358480      PMCID: PMC3930327          DOI: 10.1016/j.urology.2013.05.060

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Urology        ISSN: 0090-4295            Impact factor:   2.649


  11 in total

1.  Good urodynamic practices: uroflowmetry, filling cystometry, and pressure-flow studies.

Authors:  Werner Schäfer; Paul Abrams; Limin Liao; Anders Mattiasson; Francesco Pesce; Anders Spangberg; Arthur M Sterling; Norman R Zinner; Philip van Kerrebroeck
Journal:  Neurourol Urodyn       Date:  2002       Impact factor: 2.696

Review 2.  Transobturator and retropubic tape procedures in stress urinary incontinence: a systematic review and meta-analysis of effectiveness and complications.

Authors:  P M Latthe; R Foon; P Toozs-Hobson
Journal:  BJOG       Date:  2007-03-16       Impact factor: 6.531

3.  Retropubic versus transobturator midurethral slings for stress incontinence.

Authors:  Holly E Richter; Michael E Albo; Halina M Zyczynski; Kimberly Kenton; Peggy A Norton; Larry T Sirls; Stephen R Kraus; Toby C Chai; Gary E Lemack; Kimberly J Dandreo; R Edward Varner; Shawn Menefee; Chiara Ghetti; Linda Brubaker; Ingrid Nygaard; Salil Khandwala; Thomas A Rozanski; Harry Johnson; Joseph Schaffer; Anne M Stoddard; Robert L Holley; Charles W Nager; Pamela Moalli; Elizabeth Mueller; Amy M Arisco; Marlene Corton; Sharon Tennstedt; T Debuene Chang; E Ann Gormley; Heather J Litman
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2010-05-17       Impact factor: 91.245

4.  Normal preoperative urodynamic testing does not predict voiding dysfunction after Burch colposuspension versus pubovaginal sling.

Authors:  Gary E Lemack; Stephen Krauss; Heather Litman; Mary Pat FitzGerald; Toby Chai; Charles Nager; Larry Sirls; Halina Zyczynski; Jan Baker; Keith Lloyd; W D Steers
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2008-09-18       Impact factor: 7.450

5.  Urodynamic changes associated with successful stress urinary incontinence surgery: is a little tension a good thing?

Authors:  Stephen R Kraus; Gary E Lemack; Larry T Sirls; Toby C Chai; Linda Brubaker; Michael Albo; Wendy W Leng; L Keith Lloyd; Peggy Norton; Heather J Litman
Journal:  Urology       Date:  2011-10-11       Impact factor: 2.649

6.  Reference urodynamic values for stress incontinent women.

Authors:  C W Nager; M E Albo; M P Fitzgerald; S McDermott; L Wruck; S Kraus; N Howden; P Norton; L Sirls; E Varner; P Zimmern
Journal:  Neurourol Urodyn       Date:  2007       Impact factor: 2.696

7.  The Trial of Mid-Urethral Slings (TOMUS): Design and Methodology.

Authors: 
Journal:  J Appl Res       Date:  2008

8.  Preoperative urodynamic evaluation may predict voiding dysfunction in women undergoing pubovaginal sling.

Authors:  Elizabeth A Miller; Cindy L Amundsen; Khai Lee Toh; Brian J Flynn; George D Webster
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2003-06       Impact factor: 7.450

9.  Obstructive voiding symptoms are not predictive of elevated postvoid residual urine volumes.

Authors:  Lior Lowenstein; Charles Anderson; Kimberly Kenton; Yashika Dooley; Linda Brubaker
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct       Date:  2008-06

10.  Burch colposuspension versus fascial sling to reduce urinary stress incontinence.

Authors:  Michael E Albo; Holly E Richter; Linda Brubaker; Peggy Norton; Stephen R Kraus; Philippe E Zimmern; Toby C Chai; Halina Zyczynski; Ananias C Diokno; Sharon Tennstedt; Charles Nager; L Keith Lloyd; MaryPat FitzGerald; Gary E Lemack; Harry W Johnson; Wendy Leng; Veronica Mallett; Anne M Stoddard; Shawn Menefee; R Edward Varner; Kimberly Kenton; Pam Moalli; Larry Sirls; Kimberly J Dandreo; John W Kusek; Leroy M Nyberg; William Steers
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2007-05-21       Impact factor: 91.245

View more
  9 in total

Review 1.  Prevention, diagnosis, and management of midurethral mesh sling complications.

Authors:  A Ross Hengel; Kevin V Carlson; Richard J Baverstock
Journal:  Can Urol Assoc J       Date:  2017-06       Impact factor: 1.862

Review 2.  Mid-urethral sling operations for stress urinary incontinence in women.

Authors:  Abigail A Ford; Lynne Rogerson; June D Cody; Patricia Aluko; Joseph A Ogah
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2017-07-31

3.  Surgeons' views on sling tensioning during surgery for female stress urinary incontinence.

Authors:  Ali Borazjani; Javier Pizarro-Berdichevsky; Jianbo Li; Howard B Goldman
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J       Date:  2017-03-11       Impact factor: 2.894

4.  Incidence of successful voiding and predictors of early voiding dysfunction after retropubic sling.

Authors:  Susan A Barr; Amanda Thomas; Shannon Potter; Clifford F Melick; Jeffrey A Gavard; Mary T McLennan
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J       Date:  2016-02-19       Impact factor: 2.894

5.  Comparing postoperative voiding dysfunction after mid-urethral sling using either a Babcock or Kelly clamp tensioning technique.

Authors:  Olivia H Chang; Michele R Hacker; Peter L Rosenblatt; Dayna Neo; Emily Von Bargen; Iman Berrahou; Amy Le; Roger Lefevre; Lekha S Hota
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J       Date:  2018-03-29       Impact factor: 2.894

6.  Improving Postoperative Efficiency: An Algorithm for Expedited Void Trials After Urogynecologic Surgery.

Authors:  A Rebecca Meekins; Nazema Y Siddiqui; Cindy L Amundsen; Maragatha Kuchibhatla; Alexis A Dieter
Journal:  South Med J       Date:  2017-12       Impact factor: 0.954

7.  Early postoperative voiding dysfunction after insertion of retropubic midurethral tape.

Authors:  Hayser Medina Lucena; Harnek Rai; Chrysostomos Siozos; Douglas G Tincello; Sambita Basak; Ilias Giarenis
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J       Date:  2016-03-16       Impact factor: 2.894

8.  Transobturator midurethral sling: What should patients expect after surgery?

Authors:  Tomasz Rechberger; Andrzej Wrobel; Alicja Zietek; Ewa Rechberger; Michal Bogusiewicz; Pawel Miotla
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J       Date:  2017-07-08       Impact factor: 2.894

Review 9.  Late-occurring pain/other dysfunctions in midurethral sling class actions are likely caused by uterosacral ligament weakness, not implant or surgeon.

Authors:  Peter E P Petros
Journal:  Neurourol Urodyn       Date:  2022-04-13       Impact factor: 2.367

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.