| Literature DB >> 24358361 |
Yu-Chieh Liao1, Hsin-Hung Lin1, Chieh-Hua Lin2, Wen-Bin Chung3.
Abstract
Classical swine fever (CSF), foot-and-mouth disease (FMD) and porcine reproductive and respiratory syndrome (PRRS) are the primary diseases affecting the pig industry globally. Vaccine induced CD8(+) T cell-mediated immune response might be long-lived and cross-serotype and thus deserve further attention. Although large panels of synthetic overlapping peptides spanning the entire length of the polyproteins of a virus facilitate the detection of cytotoxic T lymphocyte (CTL) epitopes, it is an exceedingly costly and cumbersome approach. Alternatively, computational predictions have been proven to be of satisfactory accuracy and are easily performed. Such a method enables the systematic identification of genome-wide CTL epitopes by incorporating epitope prediction tools in analyzing large numbers of viral sequences. In this study, we have implemented an integrated bioinformatics pipeline for the identification of CTL epitopes of swine viruses including the CSF virus (CSFV), FMD virus (FMDV) and PRRS virus (PRRSV) and assembled these epitopes on a web resource to facilitate vaccine design. Identification of epitopes for cross protections to different subtypes of virus are also reported in this study and may be useful for the development of a universal vaccine against such viral infections among the swine population. The CTL epitopes identified in this study have been evaluated in silico and possibly provide more and wider protection in compared to traditional single-reference vaccine design. The web resource is free and open to all users through http://sb.nhri.org.tw/ICES.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2013 PMID: 24358361 PMCID: PMC3866179 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0084443
Source DB: PubMed Journal: PLoS One ISSN: 1932-6203 Impact factor: 3.240
Figure 1A schematic overview of identification of cytotoxic T lymphocyte epitopes for swine viruses (ICES).
CTL epitopes of FMDV type O viruses predicted by using genome-wide scan.
| CTL epitopes predicted | Position | Protein | Alleles | Affinity[ | Rank | Conservation |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| EPFFDWVY | 65 | L | SLA-1*0701-0702 | Null | 0.08 | 0.92 |
| YMQQYQNSM | 227 | VP4 | SLA-1*1101, SLA-3*0302 | Null | 0.01-0.08 | 1 |
| SSVGVTYGY | 314 | VP2 | SLA-2*0302, SLA-2*1002 | 40.25 | 0.05 | 0.97 |
| RFFKTHLF | 346 | VP2 | SLA-3*0602, SLA-3*0701 | Null | 0.01-0.08 | 0.99 |
| AYMRNGWDVEV | 385 | VP2 | SLA-2*0701 | Null | 0.08 | 0.98 |
| RELYQLTL | 421 | VP2 | SLA-3*0501-0503 | Null | 0.05 | 0.93 |
| YQLTLFPHQF | 424 | VP2 | SLA-3*0302, 0501-0503, SLA-6*0101-0105 | Null | 0.03-0.05 | 0.97 |
| KARYMIAY | 622 | VP3 | SLA-3*0301, 0303, 0304, 0401, 0601 | Null | 0.05-0.08 | 0.9 |
| IIATTNLY | 1309 | 2C | SLA-1*0601 | Null | 0.08 | 1 |
| FQYDCALL(NGM) | 1369 | 2C | SLA-2*1001, SLA-3*0302 | 36.43-62.01 | 0.03-0.08 | 0.97 |
| MLSDAALMVL | 1720 | 3C | SLA-2*0201-0202 | 242.31 | 0.05 | 0.99 |
| WQRFGTHFAQY | 2075 | 3D | SLA-3*0301-0304 | Null | 0.03-0.05 | 0.99 |
| AQYRNVWDVDY | 2083 | 3D | SLA-3*0601 | Null | 0.08 | 0.9 |
| NTILNNIYV(LY) | 2159 | 3D | SLA-2*0502, SLA-2*0101 | 105.69 | 0.08 | 0.98 |
| SITDVTFLK | 2231 | 3D | SLA-1*1201 | Null | 0.05 | 1 |
| HMDYGTGFY | 2243 | 3D | SLA-1*0601, SLA-2*0102 | 57.98 | 0.05-0.08 | 0.99 |
| KTLEAILSF | 2258 | 3D | SLA-1*0501, SLA-1*1301 | Null | 0.05-0.08 | 0.99 |
| FEPFQGLF(EI) | 2295 | 3D | SLA-6*0101-0105 | Null | 0.08 | 1 |
| FEIPSYRSLY | 2302 | 3D | SLA-2*0402, SLA-3*0302 | Null | 0.08 | 0.99 |
# Affinity (IC50 value in nM) is assigned "Null" if quantitative binding data not available for the swine alleles [18].
Figure 2A genome-wide scan for CTL epitopes of FMDV type O viruses generated via the identification of cytotoxic T lymphocyte epitopes for swine viruses (ICES) with the threshold of sequence conservation ≥ 0.9 and strong binding affinity (affinity IC50 ≤ 50 nM or rank among the top 0.1%).
A summary of CTL epitope predictions for swine viruses.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
| FMDV | Asia 1 | AY304994 | 431 | SSVGVTYGY (314), FQYDCALLNGM (1367) |
| Sat1 | AY593838 | 271 | None | |
| Sat2 | AY593849 | 336 | None | |
| Sat3 | AY593850 | 70 | None | |
| Type A | AY593751 | 991 | SSVGVTYGY (314), FQYDCALLNGM (1369) | |
| Type C | AF274010 | 114 | None | |
| Type O | AF308157 | 1711 | SSVGVTYGY (314), FQYDCALLNGM (1369) | |
|
| ||||
| PRRSV | Type 1 | AY366525 | 1443 | VSYYLTLY (3545) |
| Type 2 | AY150564 | 12012 | SQHGLTLPL (1640), RMMGHAWTPL (2030), FTWYQLASY (3811), YQLASYASY(I) (3814), YLASRLPM (4121) | |
|
| ||||
| CSFV | Type 1 | X87939 | 845 | SEFLLLSLV (549), NSASTTAFLI (655), VVYFLLLY (1085), FTMWADILTLI (1288), REMNYDWSL (2140), AVAFSFLLMY (3724) |
| Type 2 | HQ148063 | 68 | SEFLLLSLV(I) (549), NSASTTAFLI (655), REMNYDWSL (2140), AVAFSFLLMY (3724) | |
# Prediction scores obtained from NetMHCpan are stronger than 50 nM and among the top 0.1% rank and sequence conservation is greater than or equal to 90%.
Supporting evidences of CTL epitope predictions.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
| FMDV (foot-and-mouth disease viruses) | ||||
| RRQHTDVSF | Type O | 750 | Highly supportive | [ |
| RTLPTSFNY | Type O | 881 | Highly supportive | [ |
| PRRSV (porcine reproductive and respiratory syndrome viruses) | ||||
| CLFAILLAT | Type 1 | 4596 | Not supportive | [ |
| CAFAAFVCFVIR | Type 1 | 4721 | Not supportive | [ |
| KPEKPHFPL | Type 1 | 5028 | Not supportive | [ |
| FMLPVAHTV | Type 1 | 5083 | Highly supportive | [ |
| TMPPGFELY | Type 2 | 2702 | Highly supportive | [ |
| LAALICFVIRLAKNC | Type 2 | 4765 | Supportive | [ |
| KGRLYRWRSPVII/VEK | Type 2 | 4797 | Supportive | [ |
| CSFV (classical swine fever viruses) | ||||
| KHKVRNEVMVHWFDD | Type 1 | 1446 | Weakly supportive | [ |
| ENALLVALF | Type 1 | 2276 | Supportive | [ |
Highly supportive: peptide satisfies peptide identity and strong affinity prediction (affinity IC50 ≤ 50 nM or rank among the top 0.1%)
Supportive: peptide satisfies peptide identity and weak binding affinity prediction (affinity IC50 ≤ 500 nM or rank among the top 1%) Weakly supportive: peptide partly satisfies peptide identity and weak affinity prediction
Figure 3In silico evaluation on multiple CTL epitopes identified by various methods.
Figure 4In silico evaluation on cross-subtypic CTL epitopes.