Literature DB >> 24357962

Quantification of lumbar endurance on a backup lumbar extension dynamometer.

Staci M Hager1, Brian E Udermann1, David M Reineke2, Mark H Gibson1, John M Mayer3, Steven R Murray4.   

Abstract

We evaluated the reliability of static and dynamic lumbar muscle endurance measurements on a BackUP lumbar extension dynamometer. Sixteen healthy participants (8 male; 8 female) volunteered for this investigation. Fifty percent of each participant's body weight was calculated to determine the weight load utilized for the static (holding time) and dynamic (repetitions) lumbar extension endurance tests. Four separate tests (2 static, 2 dynamic) were conducted with at least a 24-hour rest period between tests. Test-retest intraclass correlations were shown to be high (static lumbar endurance, ICC = 0.92 (p < 0.0005); dynamic lumbar endurance, ICC = 0.93 (p < 0.0005) for both of the performed tests. Our results demonstrated that static and dynamic lumbar endurance can be assessed reliably on a BackUP lumbar extension dynamometer. Key PointsReliability studies that test lumbar endurance on machines that effectively stabilize the pelvis and isolate the lumbar extensors are limited.This is the first study to report reliability measures of static and dynamic lumbar endurance on a BackUP lumbar extension dynamometer.Static and dynamic lumbar endurance on a BackUP lumbar extension dynamometer, which uses a variety of pelvic stabilization mechanisms, can be reliably assessed in apparently healthy individuals.Future research is necessary to examine the reliability of lumbar extension endurance on the BackUP dynamometer in patient populations and validity in various settings.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Reliability; dynamic; low back; static

Year:  2006        PMID: 24357962      PMCID: PMC3861768     

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Sports Sci Med        ISSN: 1303-2968            Impact factor:   2.988


  22 in total

1.  Endurance times for low back stabilization exercises: clinical targets for testing and training from a normal database.

Authors:  S M McGill; A Childs; C Liebenson
Journal:  Arch Phys Med Rehabil       Date:  1999-08       Impact factor: 3.966

Review 2.  Management of back pain in athletes.

Authors:  T E Dreisinger; B Nelson
Journal:  Sports Med       Date:  1996-04       Impact factor: 11.136

3.  Two methods for determining trunk extensor endurance. A comparative study.

Authors:  K Jørgensen; T Nicolaisen
Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol Occup Physiol       Date:  1986

4.  Endurance training of trunk extensor muscles.

Authors:  M T Moffroid; L D Haugh; A J Haig; S M Henry; M H Pope
Journal:  Phys Ther       Date:  1993-01

5.  The efficacy of active rehabilitation in chronic low back pain. Effect on pain intensity, self-experienced disability, and lumbar fatigability.

Authors:  M Kankaanpää; S Taimela; O Airaksinen; O Hänninen
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  1999-05-15       Impact factor: 3.468

6.  The contribution of aerobic fitness and back strength to lift capacity.

Authors:  Leonard N Matheson; Scott Leggett; Vert Mooney; Karen Schneider; John Mayer
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2002-06-01       Impact factor: 3.468

7.  Physical measurements as risk indicators for low-back trouble over a one-year period.

Authors:  F Biering-Sørensen
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  1984-03       Impact factor: 3.468

8.  Trunk strength, back muscle endurance and low-back trouble.

Authors:  T Nicolaisen; K Jørgensen
Journal:  Scand J Rehabil Med       Date:  1985

9.  Quantitative Assessment of Lumbar Paraspinal Muscle Endurance.

Authors:  Brian E. Udermann; John M. Mayer; James E. Graves; Steven R. Murray
Journal:  J Athl Train       Date:  2003-09       Impact factor: 2.860

10.  Age, sex, and body mass index as determinants of back and hip extensor fatigue in the isometric Sørensen back endurance test.

Authors:  M Kankaanpää; D Laaksonen; S Taimela; S M Kokko; O Airaksinen; O Hänninen
Journal:  Arch Phys Med Rehabil       Date:  1998-09       Impact factor: 3.966

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.