Literature DB >> 24357645

Adipose- and bone marrow-derived mesenchymal stem cells display different osteogenic differentiation patterns in 3D bioactive glass-based scaffolds.

Subha N Rath1,2, Patcharakamon Nooeaid3, Andreas Arkudas1, Justus P Beier1, Leonie A Strobel1,4, Andreas Brandl1, Judith A Roether5, Raymund E Horch1, Aldo R Boccaccini3, Ulrich Kneser6,7.   

Abstract

Mesenchymal stem cells can be isolated from a variety of different sources, each having their own peculiar merits and drawbacks. Although a number of studies have been conducted comparing these stem cells for their osteo-differentiation ability, these are mostly done in culture plastics. We have selected stem cells from either adipose tissue (ADSCs) or bone marrow (BMSCs) and studied their differentiation ability in highly porous three-dimensional (3D) 45S5 Bioglass®-based scaffolds. Equal numbers of cells were seeded onto 5 × 5 × 4 mm3 scaffolds and cultured in vitro, with or without osteo-induction medium. After 2 and 4 weeks, the cell-scaffold constructs were analysed for cell number, cell spreading, viability, alkaline phosphatase activity and osteogenic gene expression. The scaffolds with ADSCs displayed osteo-differentiation even without osteo-induction medium; however, with osteo-induction medium osteogenic differentiation was further increased. In contrast, the scaffolds with BMSCs showed no osteo-differentiation without osteo-induction medium; after application of osteo-induction medium, osteo-differentiation was confirmed, although lower than in scaffolds with ADSCs. In general, stem cells in 3D bioactive glass scaffolds differentiated better than cells in culture plastics with respect to their ALP content and osteogenic gene expression. In summary, 45S5 Bioglass-based scaffolds seeded with ADSCs are well-suited for possible bone tissue-engineering applications. Induction of osteogenic differentiation appears unnecessary prior to implantation in this specific setting.
Copyright © 2013 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd. Copyright © 2013 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

Entities:  

Keywords:  adipose-derived stem cells; alkaline phosphatase; bioactive glass; bone marrow-derived stem cells; osteodifferentiation; tissue engineering

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 24357645     DOI: 10.1002/term.1849

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Tissue Eng Regen Med        ISSN: 1932-6254            Impact factor:   3.963


  16 in total

1.  SDF-1 enhances wound healing of critical-sized calvarial defects beyond self-repair capacity.

Authors:  Qiming Jin; William V Giannobile
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-05-06       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 2.  Mesenchymal or Maintenance Stem Cell & Understanding Their Role in Osteoarthritis of the Knee Joint: A Review Article.

Authors:  Ashok Kumar; Anikait Ghosh Kadamb; Krish Ghosh Kadamb
Journal:  Arch Bone Jt Surg       Date:  2020-09

3.  Bioactive copper-doped glass scaffolds can stimulate endothelial cells in co-culture in combination with mesenchymal stem cells.

Authors:  Subha N Rath; Andreas Brandl; Daniel Hiller; Alexander Hoppe; Uwe Gbureck; Raymund E Horch; Aldo R Boccaccini; Ulrich Kneser
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-12-03       Impact factor: 3.240

4.  The osteogenic response of mesenchymal stromal cells to strontium-substituted bioactive glasses.

Authors:  Martin E Santocildes-Romero; Aileen Crawford; Paul V Hatton; Rebecca L Goodchild; Ian M Reaney; Cheryl A Miller
Journal:  J Tissue Eng Regen Med       Date:  2015-03-11       Impact factor: 3.963

Review 5.  Fifty shades of white: Understanding heterogeneity in white adipose stem cells.

Authors:  Louise Cleal; Teodora Aldea; You-Ying Chau
Journal:  Adipocyte       Date:  2017-09-12       Impact factor: 4.534

6.  Multi-compartment scaffold fabricated via 3D-printing as in vitro co-culture osteogenic model.

Authors:  Elvira De Giglio; Maria A Bonifacio; Ana M Ferreira; Stefania Cometa; Zhi Yuan Ti; Antonella Stanzione; Kenny Dalgarno; Piergiorgio Gentile
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2018-10-11       Impact factor: 4.379

7.  Adipose-derived and bone marrow mesenchymal stem cells: a donor-matched comparison.

Authors:  Samih Mohamed-Ahmed; Inge Fristad; Stein Atle Lie; Salwa Suliman; Kamal Mustafa; Hallvard Vindenes; Shaza B Idris
Journal:  Stem Cell Res Ther       Date:  2018-06-19       Impact factor: 6.832

8.  Comparative proteomic analysis of osteogenic differentiated human adipose tissue and bone marrow-derived stromal cells.

Authors:  Mehran Dadras; Caroline May; Johannes Maximilian Wagner; Christoph Wallner; Mustafa Becerikli; Stephanie Dittfeld; Bettina Serschnitzki; Lukas Schilde; Annika Guntermann; Christina Sengstock; Manfred Köller; Dominik Seybold; Jan Geßmann; Thomas Armin Schildhauer; Marcus Lehnhardt; Katrin Marcus; Björn Behr
Journal:  J Cell Mol Med       Date:  2020-09-03       Impact factor: 5.310

9.  3D Culture of Bone Marrow-Derived Mesenchymal Stem Cells (BMSCs) Could Improve Bone Regeneration in 3D-Printed Porous Ti6Al4V Scaffolds.

Authors:  Lingjia Yu; Yuanhao Wu; Jieying Liu; Bo Li; Bupeng Ma; Yaqian Li; Zhenfei Huang; Yu He; Hai Wang; Zhihong Wu; Guixing Qiu
Journal:  Stem Cells Int       Date:  2018-09-05       Impact factor: 5.443

Review 10.  Adult Stem Cells for Bone Regeneration and Repair.

Authors:  Maria Rosa Iaquinta; Elisa Mazzoni; Ilaria Bononi; John Charles Rotondo; Chiara Mazziotta; Monica Montesi; Simone Sprio; Anna Tampieri; Mauro Tognon; Fernanda Martini
Journal:  Front Cell Dev Biol       Date:  2019-11-12
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.