Literature DB >> 24357515

Increase in VEGF secretion from human fibroblast cells by bioactive glass S53P4 to stimulate angiogenesis in bone.

Rainer Detsch1, Patricia Stoor, Alina Grünewald, Judith A Roether, Nina C Lindfors, Aldo R Boccaccini.   

Abstract

Bioactive glasses (BAGs) are being investigated for the repair and reconstruction of bone defects, as they exhibit osteoconductive and osteostimulatory potential. However, successful bone regeneration requires also the neovascularization of the construct which is, among other factors, guided by vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF). In this study, BAG S53P4 (53% SiO2 , 23% Na2 O, 20% CaO, 4% P2 O5 ) is investigated in relation to VEGF-release and response of fibroblast cells. Human CD-18CO fibroblasts were cultivated in contact with different granules of different sizes (0.5-0.8 mm, 1.0-2.0 mm, and 2.0-3.15 mm) and at different concentrations (0-1 wt/vol % of BAG) for 72 h. The analysis of morphology revealed no toxic effect for all granule sizes and concentrations. Compared with the reference, lactate dehydrogenase-activity of CCD-18CO cells increased in contact with BAG samples. The VEGF release from CCD-18CO fibroblasts cultured on different granule sizes and at different concentrations after 72 h of incubation was quantified. It was found that particles of 0.5-0.8 mm and 1.0-2.0 mm in size enhanced VEGF release, whereas BAG particle sizes of 2.0-3.15 mm led to inhibition of VEGF release. The results are relevant to understand the influence of the particle size and concentration of BAG S53P4 on VEGF expression and neovascularization.
© 2014 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

Entities:  

Keywords:  VEGF; bioactive glass; bone tissue engineering; fibroblast; vascularization

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24357515     DOI: 10.1002/jbm.a.35069

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Biomed Mater Res A        ISSN: 1549-3296            Impact factor:   4.396


  18 in total

Review 1.  A Review of the Clinical Side Effects of Bone Morphogenetic Protein-2.

Authors:  Aaron W James; Gregory LaChaud; Jia Shen; Greg Asatrian; Vi Nguyen; Xinli Zhang; Kang Ting; Chia Soo
Journal:  Tissue Eng Part B Rev       Date:  2016-04-19       Impact factor: 6.389

2.  Mid-term outcomes of mastoid obliteration with biological hydroxyapatite versus bioglass: a radiological and clinical study.

Authors:  Sonia Sahli-Vivicorsi; Zarrin Alavi; William Bran; Romain Cadieu; Philippe Meriot; Jean-Christophe Leclere; Rémi Marianowski
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2022-01-17       Impact factor: 3.236

Review 3.  Nanotechnology for angiogenesis: opportunities and challenges.

Authors:  Saeid Kargozar; Francesco Baino; Sepideh Hamzehlou; Michael R Hamblin; Masoud Mozafari
Journal:  Chem Soc Rev       Date:  2020-06-15       Impact factor: 54.564

4.  Bioactive glass S53P4 vs. autologous bone graft for filling defects in patients with chronic osteomyelitis and infected non-unions - a single center experience.

Authors:  Eva Steinhausen; Rolf Lefering; Martin Glombitza; Nikolaus Brinkmann; Carsten Vogel; Bastian Mester; Marcel Dudda
Journal:  J Bone Jt Infect       Date:  2021-01-12

Review 5.  Gene- and RNAi-activated scaffolds for bone tissue engineering: Current progress and future directions.

Authors:  Noah Z Laird; Timothy M Acri; Kelsie Tingle; Aliasger K Salem
Journal:  Adv Drug Deliv Rev       Date:  2021-05-18       Impact factor: 17.873

6.  In Vitro Human Umbilical Vein Endothelial Cells Response to Ionic Dissolution Products from Lithium-Containing 45S5 Bioactive Glass.

Authors:  Luis A Haro Durand; Gabriela E Vargas; Rosa Vera-Mesones; Alberto Baldi; María P Zago; María A Fanovich; Aldo R Boccaccini; Alejandro Gorustovich
Journal:  Materials (Basel)       Date:  2017-07-03       Impact factor: 3.623

7.  Evaluating the Effect of Non-cellular Bioactive Glass-Containing Scaffolds on Osteogenesis and Angiogenesis in in vivo Animal Bone Defect Models.

Authors:  Chanuka D S Ranmuthu; Charindu K I Ranmuthu; Jodie C Russell; Disha Singhania; Wasim S Khan
Journal:  Front Bioeng Biotechnol       Date:  2020-05-14

Review 8.  Clinical Applications of S53P4 Bioactive Glass in Bone Healing and Osteomyelitic Treatment: A Literature Review.

Authors:  N A P van Gestel; J Geurts; D J W Hulsen; B van Rietbergen; S Hofmann; J J Arts
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2015-10-04       Impact factor: 3.411

Review 9.  Potential of Bioactive Glasses for Cardiac and Pulmonary Tissue Engineering.

Authors:  Saeid Kargozar; Sepideh Hamzehlou; Francesco Baino
Journal:  Materials (Basel)       Date:  2017-12-15       Impact factor: 3.623

10.  Encapsulation of Rat Bone Marrow Derived Mesenchymal Stem Cells in Alginate Dialdehyde/Gelatin Microbeads with and without Nanoscaled Bioactive Glass for In Vivo Bone Tissue Engineering.

Authors:  Ulrike Rottensteiner-Brandl; Rainer Detsch; Bapi Sarker; Lara Lingens; Katrin Köhn; Ulrich Kneser; Anja K Bosserhoff; Raymund E Horch; Aldo R Boccaccini; Andreas Arkudas
Journal:  Materials (Basel)       Date:  2018-10-01       Impact factor: 3.623

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.