Literature DB >> 24357257

Cesarean scar pregnancy and early placenta accreta share common histology.

I E Timor-Tritsch1, A Monteagudo, G Cali, J M Palacios-Jaraquemada, R Maymon, A A Arslan, N Patil, D Popiolek, K R Mittal.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To determine, by evaluation of histological slides, images and descriptions of early (second-trimester) placenta accreta (EPA) and placental implantation in cases of Cesarean scar pregnancy (CSP), whether these are pathologically indistinguishable and whether they both represent different stages in the disease continuum leading to morbidly adherent placenta in the third trimester.
METHODS: The database of a previously published review of CSP and EPA was used to identify articles with histopathological descriptions and electronic images for pathological review. When possible, microscopic slides and/or paraffin blocks were obtained from the original researchers. We also included from our own institutions cases of CSP and EPA for which pathology specimens were available. Two pathologists examined all the material independently and, blinded to each other's findings, provided a pathological diagnosis based on microscopic appearance. Interobserver agreement in diagnosis was determined.
RESULTS: Forty articles were identified, which included 31 cases of CSP and 13 cases of EPA containing histopathological descriptions and/or images of the pathology. We additionally included six cases of CSP and eight cases of EPA from our own institutions, giving a total of 58 cases available for histological evaluation (37 CSP and 21 EPA) containing clear definitions of morbidly adherent placenta. In the 29 cases for which images/slides were available for histopathological evaluation, both pathologists attested to the various degrees of myometrial and/or scar tissue invasion by placental villi with scant or no intervening decidua, consistent with the classic definition of morbidly adherent placenta. Based on the reviewed material, cases with a diagnosis of EPA and those with a diagnosis of CSP showed identical histopathological features. Interobserver correlation was high (kappa = 0.93).
CONCLUSIONS: EPA and placental implantation in CSP are histopathologically indistinguishable and may represent different stages in the disease continuum leading to morbidly adherent placenta in the third trimester.
Copyright © 2013 ISUOG. Published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Cesarean section scar; early placenta accreta; morbidly adherent placenta; placental histology

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24357257     DOI: 10.1002/uog.13282

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol        ISSN: 0960-7692            Impact factor:   7.299


  23 in total

Review 1.  The role of extracellular matrix in normal and pathological pregnancy: Future applications of microphysiological systems in reproductive medicine.

Authors:  Blakely B O'Connor; Benjamin D Pope; Michael M Peters; Carrie Ris-Stalpers; Kevin K Parker
Journal:  Exp Biol Med (Maywood)       Date:  2020-07-08

Review 2.  Pitfalls in Ultrasound Diagnosis of Cesarean Scar Pregnancy.

Authors:  Lakshmy Ravi Selvaraj; Nity Rose; Meenakshi Ramachandran
Journal:  J Obstet Gynaecol India       Date:  2017-01-12

3.  The value of transvaginal ultrasound in clinical surgical treatment of cesarean scar pregnancy.

Authors:  Zhen Zeng; Shu-Ping Ding; Xue Zeng; Sui Cao; Ling-Yu Wei; Yan-Yan Liu; Fu-Yan Yang; Jing-Ji Gong; Han-Ping Chen; Xiao-Yan Xu
Journal:  J Huazhong Univ Sci Technolog Med Sci       Date:  2017-08-08

Review 4.  Classification and reporting guidelines for the pathology diagnosis of placenta accreta spectrum (PAS) disorders: recommendations from an expert panel.

Authors:  Jonathan L Hecht; Rebecca Baergen; Linda M Ernst; Philip J Katzman; Suzanne M Jacques; Eric Jauniaux; T Yee Khong; Leon A Metlay; Liina Poder; Faisal Qureshi; Joseph T Rabban; Drucilla J Roberts; Scott Shainker; Debra S Heller
Journal:  Mod Pathol       Date:  2020-05-15       Impact factor: 7.842

5.  Catastrophic consequences of a caesarean scar pregnancy missed on ultrasound.

Authors:  Kelly Collins; Alka Kothari
Journal:  Australas J Ultrasound Med       Date:  2015-12-31

6.  [Outcome of re-pregnancy in women with uterine artery embolization for postpartum hemorrhage].

Authors:  Xiaoxiao Lin; Daifei Sun; Jun Fu; Huizhen Zhong
Journal:  Zhejiang Da Xue Xue Bao Yi Xue Ban       Date:  2019-07-25

7.  Recurrent Cesarean Scar Ectopic Pregnancy Treated with Systemic Methotrexate.

Authors:  Chima Ndubizu; Rodney A McLaren; Sandra McCalla; Mohamad Irani
Journal:  Case Rep Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2017-11-23

8.  Ultrasound-guided local injection of methotrexate and systemic intramuscular methotrexate in the treatment of cesarean scar pregnancy.

Authors:  Young Ran Kim; Myoung Jin Moon
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol Sci       Date:  2017-12-12

9.  Cesarean Scar Pregnancy: An Experience of Three Cases with Review of Literature.

Authors:  Gulnaz Shafqat; Kumail Khandwala; Hina Iqbal; Shaista Afzal
Journal:  Cureus       Date:  2018-02-01

Review 10.  Management of Cesarean Scar Pregnancy: A Single-Institution Retrospective Review.

Authors:  P Giampaolino; N De Rosa; I Morra; A Bertrando; A Di Spiezio Sardo; B Zizolfi; C Ferrara; L Della Corte; G Bifulco
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2018-03-05       Impact factor: 3.411

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.