Literature DB >> 24357243

Comparison of two models of surgical care for patients with cleft lip and palate in resource-challenged settings.

Percy Rossell-Perry1, Eddy Segura, Lorgio Salas-Bustinza, Omar Cotrina-Rabanal.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The Peruvian health system is limited in providing specialized care for patients with clefts because there are an insufficient number of hospitals and few specially trained doctors in rural areas of the country. The most common model of care in these areas is the surgical mission wherein experienced cleft surgeons perform surgeries and teach local doctors. The purpose of this research was to identify the differences in outcome between the surgical mission trip and the referral center model of care provided by the same team.
METHODS: A retrospective analysis (2002-2012) was performed on data from surgical outcomes provided by the Outreach Surgical Center Lima that utilized both models of care (surgical mission and referral center). A total of 935 procedures were performed in 680 patients with clefts who were treated by the Outreach Surgical Center Program Lima since 2002. Patients in both groups were identified from our records (medical records and screening-day registries). All patients underwent a physical examination, had photographs taken, and any unfavorable results and complications were documented. Comparison of categorical variables (including outcomes) between care models was performed using Pearson's χ (2) test or Fisher's exact test when appropriate. In all cases a two-tailed test was performed and the p value for rejecting the null hypothesis (no difference or no association) was set at 0.05.
RESULTS: We found significant differences between the two models of care with respect to unilateral cleft lip and cleft palate dehiscence (p = 0.02 and p = 0.04, respectively), palate postoperative hemorrhage (p < 0.01), and palatal fistula (p < 0.01) outcomes. DISCUSSION: Differences in observed surgical outcomes between the two models might be attributed to the surgeon's performance and/or the patient's age, and these factors are also considered with respect to the model of care. Limitations in long-term medical evaluation at each site should be identified and strategies to improve surgical outcomes must be developed to ensure that patients served by surgical missions obtain the same results achieved at a referral center.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 24357243     DOI: 10.1007/s00268-013-2395-9

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  World J Surg        ISSN: 0364-2313            Impact factor:   3.352


  34 in total

1.  A six-center international study of treatment outcome in patients with clefts of the lip and palate: Part 5. General discussion and conclusions.

Authors:  W C Shaw; E Dahl; C Asher-McDade; V Brattström; M Mars; J McWilliam; K Mølsted; D A Plint; B Prahl-Andersen; C Roberts
Journal:  Cleft Palate Craniofac J       Date:  1992-09

2.  Upper double-rotation advancement method for unilateral cleft lip repair of severe forms: classification and surgical technique.

Authors:  Percy Rossell-Perry; Arquímedes M Gavino-Gutierrez
Journal:  J Craniofac Surg       Date:  2011-11       Impact factor: 1.046

3.  The effect of surgeon experience on velopharyngeal functional outcome following palatoplasty: is there a learning curve?

Authors:  P D Witt; J C Wahlen; J L Marsh; L M Grames; T K Pilgram
Journal:  Plast Reconstr Surg       Date:  1998-10       Impact factor: 4.730

4.  Oro-nasal fistula development and velopharyngeal insufficiency following primary cleft palate surgery--an audit of 148 children born between 1985 and 1997.

Authors:  D S Inman; P Thomas; P D Hodgkinson; C A Reid
Journal:  Br J Plast Surg       Date:  2005-08-08

5.  Cleft lip and palate care in the United Kingdom--the Clinical Standards Advisory Group (CSAG) Study. Part 4: outcome comparisons, training, and conclusions.

Authors:  D Bearn; S Mildinhall; T Murphy; J J Murray; D Sell; W C Shaw; A C Williams; J R Sandy
Journal:  Cleft Palate Craniofac J       Date:  2001-01

6.  Volunteers in plastic surgery guidelines for providing surgical care for children in the less developed world.

Authors:  William J Schneider; George D Politis; Arun K Gosain; Mark R Migliori; James R Cullington; Elizabeth L Peterson; D Scott Corlew; Andrew M Wexler; Randall Flick; Allen L Van Beek
Journal:  Plast Reconstr Surg       Date:  2011-06       Impact factor: 4.730

7.  Oral health status of Russian children with unilateral cleft lip and palate.

Authors:  C Turner; A F Zagirova; L E Frolova; F J Courts; W N Williams
Journal:  Cleft Palate Craniofac J       Date:  1998-11

8.  Incidence of secondary lip surgeries as a function of cleft type and severity: one center's experience.

Authors:  K O Henkel; K Gundlach; B Saka
Journal:  Cleft Palate Craniofac J       Date:  1998-07

9.  Incidence of oronasal fistulae and velopharyngeal insufficiency after cleft palate repair: an audit of 211 children born between 1990 and 2004.

Authors:  Yun Shan Phua; Tristan de Chalain
Journal:  Cleft Palate Craniofac J       Date:  2008-03

10.  New diagram for cleft lip and palate description: the clock diagram.

Authors:  Percy Rossell-Perry
Journal:  Cleft Palate Craniofac J       Date:  2008-10-29
View more
  6 in total

1.  Comparison of two models of surgical care for patients with clefts in Peru.

Authors:  K A Kelly McQueen
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2015-01       Impact factor: 3.352

2.  Patient Barriers to Accessing Surgical Cleft Care in Vietnam: A Multi-site, Cross-Sectional Outcomes Study.

Authors:  Jordan W Swanson; Caroline A Yao; Allyn Auslander; Heather Wipfli; Thi-Hai-Duc Nguyen; Kristin Hatcher; Richard Vanderburg; William P Magee
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2017-06       Impact factor: 3.352

3.  Functional and Quality of Life Outcomes of a Hand Surgery Mission to Honduras.

Authors:  Carolyn Chuang; Jacob Azurdia; David Asuzu; Kyle T Ragins; Kevin Tomany; Sohel Islam; Steven Williams; John Safanda; J Grant Thomson
Journal:  Hand (N Y)       Date:  2017-04-28

4.  Assessment of communication technology and post-operative telephone surveillance during global urology mission.

Authors:  David E Rapp; Andrew Colhoun; Jacqueline Morin; Timothy J Bradford
Journal:  BMC Res Notes       Date:  2018-02-21

5.  Impact of short-term reconstructive surgical missions: a systematic review.

Authors:  Thom C C Hendriks; Matthijs Botman; Charissa N S Rahmee; Johannes C F Ket; Margriet G Mullender; Barend Gerretsen; Emanuel Q Nuwass; Klaas W Marck; Henri A H Winters
Journal:  BMJ Glob Health       Date:  2019-04-03

6.  The Local Mission: Improving Access to Surgical Care in Middle-Income Countries.

Authors:  Eric S Nagengast; Naikhoba C O Munabi; Meredith Xepoleas; Allyn Auslander; William P Magee; David Chong
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2021-01-02       Impact factor: 3.352

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.