BACKGROUND: Anastomotic leakage is one of the most life-threatening complications after colonic surgery. Correct diagnosis and treatment is important to reduce morbidity and mortality. An abdominal CT scan is one of the main diagnostic tools in diagnosing anastomotic leaks. The aim of this study was to examine the accuracy of abdominal CT scanning to detect anastomotic leakage and to evaluate the consequences of a false-negative CT outcome. METHODS: All consecutive patients who underwent colonic resection for malignant disease between 2009 and 2011 or for benign disease in 2010 were reviewed. Patients in whom a postoperative abdominal CT scan was performed to detect anastomotic leakage were included. RESULTS: In 97 of 524 patients who underwent colonic surgery, an abdominal CT scan was performed for the suspicion of anastomotic leakage. Overall leakage rate was 10.9 % (n = 57). Mortality rate after leakage was 21.1 % (n = 12). Results from all abdominal CT scans revealed an overall sensitivity of 0.59 (95 % CI 0.43-0.73), a specificity of 0.88 (95 % CI 0.75-0.95), positive predictive value 0.82 (95 % CI 0.64-0.92), negative predictive value 0.70 (95 % CI 0.57-0.81), and an accuracy of 74 %. Delayed reintervention for anastomotic leakage due to a false-negative CT outcome resulted in death in 62.5 % (n = 5). CONCLUSION: The sensitivity of abdominal CT scanning after colonic surgery is relatively low. A negative CT scan does not rule out anastomotic leakage. Even with a negative CT scan, we should remain equally alert at clinical deterioration as an argument for timely intervention.
BACKGROUND: Anastomotic leakage is one of the most life-threatening complications after colonic surgery. Correct diagnosis and treatment is important to reduce morbidity and mortality. An abdominal CT scan is one of the main diagnostic tools in diagnosing anastomotic leaks. The aim of this study was to examine the accuracy of abdominal CT scanning to detect anastomotic leakage and to evaluate the consequences of a false-negative CT outcome. METHODS: All consecutive patients who underwent colonic resection for malignant disease between 2009 and 2011 or for benign disease in 2010 were reviewed. Patients in whom a postoperative abdominal CT scan was performed to detect anastomotic leakage were included. RESULTS: In 97 of 524 patients who underwent colonic surgery, an abdominal CT scan was performed for the suspicion of anastomotic leakage. Overall leakage rate was 10.9 % (n = 57). Mortality rate after leakage was 21.1 % (n = 12). Results from all abdominal CT scans revealed an overall sensitivity of 0.59 (95 % CI 0.43-0.73), a specificity of 0.88 (95 % CI 0.75-0.95), positive predictive value 0.82 (95 % CI 0.64-0.92), negative predictive value 0.70 (95 % CI 0.57-0.81), and an accuracy of 74 %. Delayed reintervention for anastomotic leakage due to a false-negative CT outcome resulted in death in 62.5 % (n = 5). CONCLUSION: The sensitivity of abdominal CT scanning after colonic surgery is relatively low. A negative CT scan does not rule out anastomotic leakage. Even with a negative CT scan, we should remain equally alert at clinical deterioration as an argument for timely intervention.
Authors: Jan Willem T Dekker; Gerrit Jan Liefers; Johan C A de Mol van Otterloo; Hein Putter; Rob A E M Tollenaar Journal: J Surg Res Date: 2010-12-01 Impact factor: 2.192
Authors: Verena N N Kornmann; Nikki Treskes; Lilian H F Hoonhout; Thomas L Bollen; Bert van Ramshorst; Djamila Boerma Journal: Int J Colorectal Dis Date: 2012-12-14 Impact factor: 2.571
Authors: Luigi De Magistris; Brice Paquette; David Orry; Olivier Facy; Giovanni Di Giacomo; Patrick Rat; Christine Binquet; Pablo Ortega-Deballon Journal: Int J Colorectal Dis Date: 2016-06-29 Impact factor: 2.571
Authors: Astrid A M Huiberts; Lea M Dijksman; Simone A Boer; Eveline J T Krul; Jan Peringa; Sandra C Donkervoort Journal: Int J Colorectal Dis Date: 2015-04-25 Impact factor: 2.571
Authors: Benjamin D Shogan; Natalia Belogortseva; Preston M Luong; Alexander Zaborin; Simon Lax; Cindy Bethel; Marc Ward; Joseph P Muldoon; Mark Singer; Gary An; Konstantin Umanskiy; Vani Konda; Baddr Shakhsheer; James Luo; Robin Klabbers; Lynn E Hancock; Jack Gilbert; Olga Zaborina; John C Alverdy Journal: Sci Transl Med Date: 2015-05-06 Impact factor: 17.956
Authors: N Moreno-Lopez; S Mvouama; A Bourredjem; I Fournel; T Perrin; A Flaris; P Rat; O Facy Journal: Tech Coloproctol Date: 2022-10-20 Impact factor: 3.699
Authors: Stephen T McSorley; Bo Y Khor; Graham J MacKay; Paul G Horgan; Donald C McMillan Journal: Medicine (Baltimore) Date: 2017-02 Impact factor: 1.889
Authors: Marek Zawadzki; Małgorzata Krzystek-Korpacka; Andrzej Gamian; Wojciech Witkiewicz Journal: Wideochir Inne Tech Maloinwazyjne Date: 2018-01-16 Impact factor: 1.195