Literature DB >> 24356776

Cannula dacryocystorhinostomy: a simple, innovative and cost-effective method of lacrimal surgery.

Shreya M Shah1, Mehul A Shah, Chintan Patel.   

Abstract

To compare our innovative, cost-effective method of lacrimal surgery with other methods. A prospective cohort study. The study included 80 eyes of 80 consecutive patients who presented to our clinic between January 2009 and December 2011. The patients underwent surgery using a new technique with a specially designed cannula and were followed according to our protocol. Patency on irrigation. Of the 80 cases enrolled, the procedure was successful in 52.5 % with a mean follow-up of 247.2 days. The success rate was significantly affected by the preoperative conditions (p = 0.001) and follow-up duration (p = 0.006). This simple innovative technique was cost-effective and the results were comparable with those of other techniques.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 24356776     DOI: 10.1007/s10792-013-9889-1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int Ophthalmol        ISSN: 0165-5701            Impact factor:   2.031


  17 in total

1.  Endolacrimal laser assisted lacrimal surgery.

Authors:  K Muellner; E Bodner; G E Mannor; G Wolf; T Hofmann; W Luxenberger
Journal:  Br J Ophthalmol       Date:  2000-01       Impact factor: 4.638

2.  Comparative external versus endoscopic dacryocystorhinostomy: results in 115 patients (130 eyes).

Authors:  Y Cokkeser; C Evereklioglu; H Er
Journal:  Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg       Date:  2000-10       Impact factor: 3.497

3.  Pediatric endocanalicular diode laser dacryocystorhinostomy: results of a minimally invasive surgical technique.

Authors:  Ismail Onder Uysal; Muammer Ozçimen; Halil Ibrahim Yener; Ali Kal
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2011-03-27       Impact factor: 2.503

4.  Primary acquired nasolacrimal duct obstruction. A clinicopathologic report and biopsy technique.

Authors:  J V Linberg; S A McCormick
Journal:  Ophthalmology       Date:  1986-08       Impact factor: 12.079

5.  Results of dacryocystorhinostomy analysis of causes for failure.

Authors:  R A Welham; P H Henderson
Journal:  Trans Ophthalmol Soc U K       Date:  1973

6.  [Dacryocystorhinostomia externa. Technique, indications and results].

Authors:  K H Emmerich; H Busse; H W Meyer-Rüsenberg
Journal:  Ophthalmologe       Date:  1994-06       Impact factor: 1.059

7.  Endonasal laser dacryocystorhinostomy and external dacryocystorhinostomy outcome profile in a general ophthalmic service unit: a comparative retrospective study.

Authors:  H A Ibrahim; M Batterbury; G Banhegyi; J McGalliard
Journal:  Ophthalmic Surg Lasers       Date:  2001 May-Jun

8.  Endonasal dacryocystorhinostomy: a report by the American Academy of Ophthalmology.

Authors:  J J Woog; R H Kennedy; P L Custer; S A Kaltreider; D R Meyer; J G Camara
Journal:  Ophthalmology       Date:  2001-12       Impact factor: 12.079

9.  Outpatient dacryocystorhinostomy.

Authors:  S C Dresner; K G Klussman; D R Meyer; J V Linberg
Journal:  Ophthalmic Surg       Date:  1991-04

10.  Comparison of external dacryocystorhinostomy with nonlaser endonasal dacryocystorhinostomy.

Authors:  Peter J Dolman
Journal:  Ophthalmology       Date:  2003-01       Impact factor: 12.079

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.