BACKGROUND: To determine the maximal tolerated dose of erlotinib when added to 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) chemoradiation and bevacizumab and safety and efficacy of this combination in patients with locally advanced rectal cancer. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients with Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) or ultrasound defined T3 or T4 adenocarcinoma of the rectum and without evidence of metastatic disease were enrolled. Patients received infusional 5-FU 225 mg/M2/day continuously, along with bevacizumab 5 mg/kg days 14, 1, 15 and 29. Standard radiotherapy was administered to 50.4 Gy in 28 fractions. Erlotinib started at a dose of 50 mg orally daily and advanced by 50 mg increments in the subsequent cohort. Open total mesorectal excision was carried out 6-9 weeks following the completion of chemoradiation. RESULTS: Thirty-two patients received one of three dose levels of erlotinib. Erlotinib dose level of 100 mg was determined to be the maximally tolerated dose. Thirty-one patients underwent resection of the primary tumor, one refused resection. Twenty-seven patients completed study therapy, all of whom underwent resection. At least one grade 3-4 toxicity occurred in 46.9% of patients. Grade 3-4 diarrhea occurred in 18.8%. The pathologic complete response (pCR) for all patients completing study therapy was 33%. With a median follow-up of 2.9 years, there are no documented local recurrences. Disease-free survival at 3 years is 75.5% (confidence interval: 55.1-87.6%). CONCLUSIONS: Erlotinib added to infusional 5-FU, bevacizumab and radiation in patients with locally advanced rectal cancer is relatively well tolerated and associated with an encouraging pCR.
BACKGROUND: To determine the maximal tolerated dose of erlotinib when added to 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) chemoradiation and bevacizumab and safety and efficacy of this combination in patients with locally advanced rectal cancer. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients with Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) or ultrasound defined T3 or T4 adenocarcinoma of the rectum and without evidence of metastatic disease were enrolled. Patients received infusional 5-FU 225 mg/M2/day continuously, along with bevacizumab 5 mg/kg days 14, 1, 15 and 29. Standard radiotherapy was administered to 50.4 Gy in 28 fractions. Erlotinib started at a dose of 50 mg orally daily and advanced by 50 mg increments in the subsequent cohort. Open total mesorectal excision was carried out 6-9 weeks following the completion of chemoradiation. RESULTS: Thirty-two patients received one of three dose levels of erlotinib. Erlotinib dose level of 100 mg was determined to be the maximally tolerated dose. Thirty-one patients underwent resection of the primary tumor, one refused resection. Twenty-seven patients completed study therapy, all of whom underwent resection. At least one grade 3-4 toxicity occurred in 46.9% of patients. Grade 3-4 diarrhea occurred in 18.8%. The pathologic complete response (pCR) for all patients completing study therapy was 33%. With a median follow-up of 2.9 years, there are no documented local recurrences. Disease-free survival at 3 years is 75.5% (confidence interval: 55.1-87.6%). CONCLUSIONS:Erlotinib added to infusional 5-FU, bevacizumab and radiation in patients with locally advanced rectal cancer is relatively well tolerated and associated with an encouraging pCR.
Entities:
Keywords:
bevacizumab; erlotinib; radiation; rectal cancer
Authors: Rolf Sauer; Heinz Becker; Werner Hohenberger; Claus Rödel; Christian Wittekind; Rainer Fietkau; Peter Martus; Jörg Tschmelitsch; Eva Hager; Clemens F Hess; Johann-H Karstens; Torsten Liersch; Heinz Schmidberger; Rudolf Raab Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 2004-10-21 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: Brian G Czito; Christopher G Willett; Johanna C Bendell; Michael A Morse; Douglas S Tyler; Nishan H Fernando; Christopher R Mantyh; Gerard C Blobe; Wanda Honeycutt; Daohai Yu; Bryan M Clary; Theodore N Pappas; Kirk A Ludwig; Herbert I Hurwitz Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 2006-02-01 Impact factor: 44.544
Authors: Brian G Czito; Johanna C Bendell; Christopher G Willett; Michael A Morse; Gerard C Blobe; Douglas S Tyler; John Thomas; Kirk A Ludwig; Christopher R Mantyh; Jill Ashton; Daohai Yu; Herbert I Hurwitz Journal: Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys Date: 2007-06-01 Impact factor: 7.038
Authors: Derek J Jonker; Chris J O'Callaghan; Christos S Karapetis; John R Zalcberg; Dongsheng Tu; Heather-Jane Au; Scott R Berry; Marianne Krahn; Timothy Price; R John Simes; Niall C Tebbutt; Guy van Hazel; Rafal Wierzbicki; Christiane Langer; Malcolm J Moore Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 2007-11-15 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: Herbert Hurwitz; Louis Fehrenbacher; William Novotny; Thomas Cartwright; John Hainsworth; William Heim; Jordan Berlin; Ari Baron; Susan Griffing; Eric Holmgren; Napoleone Ferrara; Gwen Fyfe; Beth Rogers; Robert Ross; Fairooz Kabbinavar Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 2004-06-03 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: Theodore S Hong; Jennifer Moughan; Michael C Garofalo; Johanna Bendell; Adam C Berger; Nicklas B E Oldenburg; Pramila Rani Anne; Francisco Perera; R Jeffrey Lee; Salma K Jabbour; Adam Nowlan; Albert DeNittis; Christopher Crane Journal: Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys Date: 2015-05-14 Impact factor: 7.038
Authors: Thomas J George; Aaron J Franke; A Bapsi Chakravarthy; Prajnan Das; Arvind Dasari; Bassel F El-Rayes; Theodore S Hong; Timothy J Kinsella; Jerome C Landry; James J Lee; Arta M Monjazeb; Samuel A Jacobs; David Raben; Osama E Rahma; Terence M Williams; Christina Wu; C Norman Coleman; Bhadrasain Vikram; Mansoor M Ahmed Journal: Cancer Date: 2019-04-24 Impact factor: 6.860
Authors: Esther A Kleibeuker; Matthijs A Ten Hooven; Henk M Verheul; Ben J Slotman; Victor L Thijssen Journal: Angiogenesis Date: 2015-07-23 Impact factor: 9.596