Literature DB >> 24356546

Adult renal size is not a suitable marker for nephron numbers: an individual patient data meta-analysis.

Ruud Rg Bueters1, Nicole Caj van de Kar, Michiel F Schreuder.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Renal size is often used as a marker for nephron numbers as estimation of glomerular numbers is not yet possible in vivo. However, the validity of an association between the two is questionable. As a proper marker for nephron number in an individual is needed in clinical practice, this study was designed to assess the association between renal size and nephron numbers.
METHODS: An individual patient data meta-analysis was performed on data retrieved with a PubMed and Embase search. Only studies were included that described individual human data on kidney size and nephron numbers determined by stereology, the gold standard methodology to estimate nephron numbers. As renal size increases until the end of puberty, and nephron numbers decline after the age of 60 years, only data from individuals aged 18-60 years without renal disease were included.
RESULTS: Six papers were identified that provided data on renal weight and nephron numbers from 114 individuals. Backward linear regression identified kidney weight and race as the only 2 significant factors explaining nephron numbers (R square 0.085, p=0.007). Controlling for race, there was a significant correlation between nephron number and kidney weight (r=0.231, r square=0.053, p=0.01).
CONCLUSION: These data indicate that only ∼5% of the variation in nephron numbers is explained by differences in renal size. Renal size in adulthood should not be used as a marker for nephron numbers in an individual.
© 2013 S. Karger AG, Basel.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 24356546     DOI: 10.1159/000355734

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Kidney Blood Press Res        ISSN: 1420-4096            Impact factor:   2.687


  9 in total

Review 1.  Quantitative renal magnetic resonance imaging: magnetic resonance urography.

Authors:  J Damien Grattan-Smith; Jeanne Chow; Sila Kurugol; Richard Alan Jones
Journal:  Pediatr Radiol       Date:  2022-01-13

2.  Automated Segmentation of Kidneys from MR Images in Patients with Autosomal Dominant Polycystic Kidney Disease.

Authors:  Youngwoo Kim; Yinghui Ge; Cheng Tao; Jianbing Zhu; Arlene B Chapman; Vicente E Torres; Alan S L Yu; Michal Mrug; William M Bennett; Michael F Flessner; Doug P Landsittel; Kyongtae T Bae
Journal:  Clin J Am Soc Nephrol       Date:  2016-01-21       Impact factor: 8.237

Review 3.  Prognostic factors and biomarkers of congenital obstructive nephropathy.

Authors:  Robert L Chevalier
Journal:  Pediatr Nephrol       Date:  2015-12-14       Impact factor: 3.714

Review 4.  Assessment of kidney function in preterm infants: lifelong implications.

Authors:  Carolyn L Abitbol; Marissa J DeFreitas; José Strauss
Journal:  Pediatr Nephrol       Date:  2016-02-04       Impact factor: 3.714

5.  The Impact of Kidney Development on the Life Course: A Consensus Document for Action.

Authors: 
Journal:  Nephron       Date:  2017-03-21       Impact factor: 2.847

Review 6.  Life with one kidney.

Authors:  Michiel F Schreuder
Journal:  Pediatr Nephrol       Date:  2017-05-29       Impact factor: 3.714

7.  Birth Weight Is Associated With Kidney Size in Middle-Aged Women.

Authors:  Bjørn Steinar Lillås; Tor Hatlestad Qvale; Blazej Konrad Richter; Bjørn Egil Vikse
Journal:  Kidney Int Rep       Date:  2021-09-07

8.  Nephron number and its determinants: a 2020 update.

Authors:  Jennifer R Charlton; Edwin J Baldelomar; Dylan M Hyatt; Kevin M Bennett
Journal:  Pediatr Nephrol       Date:  2020-04-29       Impact factor: 3.714

9.  Assessment of Fetal Kidney Growth and Birth Weight in an Indigenous Australian Cohort.

Authors:  Christopher J Diehm; Eugenie R Lumbers; Loretta Weatherall; Lyniece Keogh; Sandra Eades; Alex Brown; Roger Smith; Vanessa Johnson; Kirsty G Pringle; Kym M Rae
Journal:  Front Physiol       Date:  2018-01-09       Impact factor: 4.566

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.