PURPOSE: Graft parenchyma perfusion disturbances (GPPD) in transplanted kidneys are common in the early postoperative period. Rapid and accurate diagnosis can guide proper treatment, preventing graft dysfunction. METHODS: One hundred and eighty patients, who underwent kidney transplantation (KTx), were examined in the immediate postoperative period using real-time ultrasonography (B-mode) with color and power Doppler (US-CD/PD) and B-flow ultrasound, as well as with an additional protocol of contrast-enhanced ultrasonography (CE-US). Regions of GPPD were localized and measured. The number and size of these areas were compared between the two acquisition techniques. Follow-up examinations were carried out 6 months postoperatively. RESULTS: CE-US revealed more GPPDs and showed them more precisely than the B+US-CD/PD/B-flow technique. Moreover, in the CE-US examination, ischemic foci had statistically significant higher echogenicity in comparison to normal parenchyma, were larger and better visualized (better circumscribed) than in B+US-CD/PD/B-flow. CONCLUSION: CE-US allows the visualization of GPPD caused by occlusion of small arteries. It is a noninvasive, safe, real-time method, which has many advantages over standard B+US-CD/PD/B-flow examinations, and we recommend it as a routine diagnostic procedure in the early postoperative period following KTx.
PURPOSE: Graft parenchyma perfusion disturbances (GPPD) in transplanted kidneys are common in the early postoperative period. Rapid and accurate diagnosis can guide proper treatment, preventing graft dysfunction. METHODS: One hundred and eighty patients, who underwent kidney transplantation (KTx), were examined in the immediate postoperative period using real-time ultrasonography (B-mode) with color and power Doppler (US-CD/PD) and B-flow ultrasound, as well as with an additional protocol of contrast-enhanced ultrasonography (CE-US). Regions of GPPD were localized and measured. The number and size of these areas were compared between the two acquisition techniques. Follow-up examinations were carried out 6 months postoperatively. RESULTS: CE-US revealed more GPPDs and showed them more precisely than the B+US-CD/PD/B-flow technique. Moreover, in the CE-US examination, ischemic foci had statistically significant higher echogenicity in comparison to normal parenchyma, were larger and better visualized (better circumscribed) than in B+US-CD/PD/B-flow. CONCLUSION: CE-US allows the visualization of GPPD caused by occlusion of small arteries. It is a noninvasive, safe, real-time method, which has many advantages over standard B+US-CD/PD/B-flow examinations, and we recommend it as a routine diagnostic procedure in the early postoperative period following KTx.