Literature DB >> 24355883

Accuracy and implications of percutaneous renal biopsy in the management of renal masses.

Diana C Londoño1, Melanie C Wuerstle, Anil A Thomas, Luis E Salazar, Jin-Wen Y Hsu, Tarek Danial, Gary W Chien.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: Percutaneous renal biopsy in patients with renal masses is increasing. We investigated the accuracy of percutaneous renal mass biopsy results in patients undergoing evaluation of solid renal masses.
METHODS: A retrospective review was performed of patients in the Kaiser Permanente Southern California Region who underwent computed tomography or ultrasound-guided percutaneous renal biopsy of a solid renal mass between January 2005 and December 2009. Patients were stratified by size of mass (≤ 4 cm vs > 4 cm). Initial biopsy results were correlated with final pathology specimens after extirpation.
RESULTS: Medical records of 126 patients (129 renal units with 132 biopsies) were reviewed. Initial diagnostic biopsies revealed 87 (66%) malignant, 38 (29%) benign, and 7 (5%) nondiagnostic lesions. Sixty-three patients (50%) ultimately underwent extirpative surgery (23 partial and 40 radical nephrectomies). Of these patients, the diagnostic accuracy of the initial percutaneous renal mass biopsy was 76%, with an overall sensitivity and specificity of 75.4% and 100%, respectively. The biopsy concordance to final histologic tumor subtype was 93%. Larger tumor size (odds ratio [OR], 2.20; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.55 to 8.88) and increasing number of biopsies (OR, 2.50; 95% CI, 0.59 to 10.69) were associated with increasing accuracy of a biopsy result to predict cancer; however, these associations were not statistically significant.
CONCLUSION: Percutaneous renal mass biopsy is diagnostically accurate and has good sensitivity, specificity, and concordance with final pathologic renal cell carcinoma subtype. This diagnostic modality can assist in management of select renal masses as treatment options are expanding.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 24355883      PMCID: PMC3783072          DOI: 10.7812/TPP/12-110

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Perm J        ISSN: 1552-5767


  14 in total

1.  Accuracy of percutaneous core biopsy in management of small renal masses.

Authors:  Rou Wang; J Stuart Wolf; David P Wood; Ellen J Higgins; Khaled S Hafez
Journal:  Urology       Date:  2009-01-01       Impact factor: 2.649

Review 2.  Small renal masses: risk prediction and contemporary management.

Authors:  Yuka Yamaguchi; Matthew N Simmons; Steven C Campbell
Journal:  Hematol Oncol Clin North Am       Date:  2011-08       Impact factor: 3.722

Review 3.  Small renal masses: toward more rational treatment.

Authors:  Anil A Thomas; Steven C Campbell
Journal:  Cleve Clin J Med       Date:  2011-08       Impact factor: 2.321

4.  Percutaneous biopsy of renal masses: sensitivity and negative predictive value stratified by clinical setting and size of masses.

Authors:  Frank J Rybicki; Kirstin M Shu; Edmund S Cibas; Julia R Fielding; Eric vanSonnenberg; Stuart G Silverman
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  2003-05       Impact factor: 3.959

5.  Rising incidence of small renal masses: a need to reassess treatment effect.

Authors:  John M Hollingsworth; David C Miller; Stephanie Daignault; Brent K Hollenbeck
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  2006-09-20       Impact factor: 13.506

6.  Rising incidence of renal cell cancer in the United States.

Authors:  W H Chow; S S Devesa; J L Warren; J F Fraumeni
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  1999-05-05       Impact factor: 56.272

7.  The value of preoperative needle core biopsy for diagnosing benign lesions among small, incidentally detected renal masses.

Authors:  Beverley A Shannon; Ronald J Cohen; Hildemarie de Bruto; Robert J Davies
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2008-08-15       Impact factor: 7.450

8.  Solid renal tumors: an analysis of pathological features related to tumor size.

Authors:  Igor Frank; Michael L Blute; John C Cheville; Christine M Lohse; Amy L Weaver; Horst Zincke
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2003-12       Impact factor: 7.450

9.  Diagnostic accuracy of computed tomography-guided percutaneous biopsy of renal masses.

Authors:  Joerg Schmidbauer; Mesut Remzi; Mazda Memarsadeghi; Andrea Haitel; Hans Christoph Klingler; Daniela Katzenbeisser; Helene Wiener; Michael Marberger
Journal:  Eur Urol       Date:  2007-11-26       Impact factor: 20.096

10.  Should elective partial nephrectomy be performed for renal cell carcinoma >4 cm in size?

Authors:  Paul Russo
Journal:  Nat Clin Pract Urol       Date:  2008-07-22
View more
  2 in total

Review 1.  Diagnostic Accuracy and Risks of Biopsy in the Diagnosis of a Renal Mass Suspicious for Localized Renal Cell Carcinoma: Systematic Review of the Literature.

Authors:  Hiten D Patel; Michael H Johnson; Phillip M Pierorazio; Stephen M Sozio; Ritu Sharma; Emmanuel Iyoha; Eric B Bass; Mohamad E Allaf
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2016-02-18       Impact factor: 7.450

2.  Percutaneous CT-guided needle biopsies of musculoskeletal tumors: a 5-year analysis of non-diagnostic biopsies.

Authors:  Connie Y Chang; Ambrose J Huang; Miriam A Bredella; Martin Torriani; Elkan F Halpern; Daniel I Rosenthal; Dempsey S Springfield
Journal:  Skeletal Radiol       Date:  2015-09-04       Impact factor: 2.199

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.