Literature DB >> 24355817

Ecological parameters influencing microbial diversity and stability of traditional sourdough.

Fabio Minervini1, Maria De Angelis2, Raffaella Di Cagno2, Marco Gobbetti2.   

Abstract

The quality of some leavened, sourdough baked goods is not always consistent, unless a well propagated sourdough starter culture is used for the dough fermentation. Among the different types of sourdough used, the traditional sourdough has attracted the interest of researchers, mainly because of its large microbial diversity, especially with respect to lactic acid bacteria. Variation in this diversity and the factors that cause it will impact on quality and is the subject of this review. Sourdough microbial diversity is mainly caused by the following factors: (i) sourdough is obtained through spontaneous, multi-step fermentation; (ii) it is propagated using flour, whose nutrient content may vary according to the batch and to the crop, and which is naturally contaminated by microorganisms; and (iii) it is propagated under peculiar technological parameters, which vary depending on the historical and cultural background and type of baked good. In the population dynamics leading from flour to mature sourdough, lactic acid bacteria (several species of Lactobacillus sp., Leuconostoc sp., and Weissella sp.) and yeasts (mainly Saccharomyces cerevisiae and Candida sp.) outcompete other microbial groups contaminating flour, and interact with each other at different levels. Ecological parameters qualitatively and quantitatively affecting the dominant sourdough microbiota may be classified into specific technological parameters (e.g., percentage of sourdough used as inoculum, time and temperature of fermentation) and parameters that are not fully controlled by those who manage the propagation of sourdough (e.g., chemical, enzyme and microbial composition of flour). Although some sourdoughs have been reported to harbour a persistent dominant microbiota, the stability of sourdough ecosystem during time is debated. Indeed, several factors may interfere with the persistence of species and strains associations that are typical of a given sourdough: metabolic adaptability to the stressing conditions of sourdough, nutritional and antagonistic interactions among microorganisms, intrinsic robustness of microorganisms, and existence of a stable house microbiota. Further studies have to be performed in order to highlight hidden mechanisms underlying the microbial structure and stability of sourdough. The comprehension of such mechanisms would be helpful to assess the most appropriate conditions that allow keeping a given traditional sourdough as a stable microbial ecosystem, thus preserving, during time, the typical traits of the resulting product.
Copyright © 2013 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Back-slopping; Flour; Lactic acid bacteria; Microbial ecology; Traditional sourdough; Yeasts

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 24355817     DOI: 10.1016/j.ijfoodmicro.2013.11.021

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Food Microbiol        ISSN: 0168-1605            Impact factor:   5.277


  30 in total

1.  Hydroxycinnamic acids used as external acceptors of electrons: an energetic advantage for strictly heterofermentative lactic acid bacteria.

Authors:  Pasquale Filannino; Marco Gobbetti; Maria De Angelis; Raffaella Di Cagno
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2014-09-26       Impact factor: 4.792

2.  Diversity of the lactic acid bacterium and yeast microbiota in the switch from firm- to liquid-sourdough fermentation.

Authors:  Raffaella Di Cagno; Erica Pontonio; Solange Buchin; Maria De Angelis; Anna Lattanzi; Francesca Valerio; Marco Gobbetti; Maria Calasso
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2014-03-14       Impact factor: 4.792

3.  Comparison of lactic acid bacteria diversity during the fermentation of Tarhana produced at home and on a commercial scale.

Authors:  Ömer Şimşek; Serap Özel; Ahmet Hilmi Çon
Journal:  Food Sci Biotechnol       Date:  2017-02-28       Impact factor: 2.391

Review 4.  Microbial Dynamics in Traditional and Modern Sour Beer Production.

Authors:  Anna Dysvik; Sabina Leanti La Rosa; Gert De Rouck; Elling-Olav Rukke; Bjørge Westereng; Trude Wicklund
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2020-07-02       Impact factor: 4.792

5.  Technological Performance and Selection of Lactic Acid Bacteria Isolated from Argentinian Grains as Starters for Wheat Sourdough.

Authors:  Romina Lancetti; Lorena Sciarini; Gabriela T Pérez; Emiliano Salvucci
Journal:  Curr Microbiol       Date:  2020-10-24       Impact factor: 2.188

6.  Different Flour Microbial Communities Drive to Sourdoughs Characterized by Diverse Bacterial Strains and Free Amino Acid Profiles.

Authors:  Giuseppe Celano; Maria De Angelis; Fabio Minervini; Marco Gobbetti
Journal:  Front Microbiol       Date:  2016-11-08       Impact factor: 5.640

7.  Regulatory Mechanisms of L-Lactic Acid and Taste Substances in Chinese Acid Rice Soup (Rice-Acid) Fermented With a Lacticaseibacillus paracasei and Kluyveromyces marxianus.

Authors:  Na Liu; Likang Qin; Song Miao
Journal:  Front Microbiol       Date:  2021-05-21       Impact factor: 5.640

8.  Metagenetic Analysis for Microbial Characterization of Focaccia Doughs Obtained by Using Two Different Starters: Traditional Baker's Yeast and a Selected Leuconostoc citreum Strain.

Authors:  Massimo Ferrara; Angelo Sisto; Giuseppina Mulè; Paola Lavermicocca; Palmira De Bellis
Journal:  Foods       Date:  2021-05-25

9.  Evolution of bacterial consortia in spontaneously started rye sourdoughs during two months of daily propagation.

Authors:  Marianna Bessmeltseva; Ene Viiard; Jaak Simm; Toomas Paalme; Inga Sarand
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-04-18       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  Diversity and Stability of Lactic Acid Bacteria in Rye Sourdoughs of Four Bakeries with Different Propagation Parameters.

Authors:  Ene Viiard; Marianna Bessmeltseva; Jaak Simm; Tiina Talve; Anu Aaspõllu; Toomas Paalme; Inga Sarand
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-02-05       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.