BACKGROUND: Adrenal venous sampling (AVS) is used to distinguish between bilateral idiopathic hyperplasia and a functional adrenal tumor in patients with hyperaldosteronism. Successful sampling from both adrenal veins is necessary for lateralization and may require more than 1 procedure. AVS has traditionally been performed by interventional radiologists; however, our goal was to examine the outcomes when performed by a vascular surgeon. METHODS: All patients with a diagnosis of hyperaldosteronism were referred for AVS regardless of imaging findings. Cortisol and aldosterone levels were measured in blood samples from both adrenal veins. Postoperative analysis of intraoperative laboratory values before and after cosyntropin administration determined successful cannulation and sampling of each vein. RESULTS: Between 2007 and 2012, 53 patients underwent AVS by one vascular surgeon. The average age was 54 and 63% were men. Our success rate increased with experience, because during the earlier years (2007-2010) primary and secondary success rates were 58% and 68%, respectively compared with later years (2011-2012) when primary and secondary success rates were 82% and 95%, respectively (P<0.05). Results of AVS altered localization of disease compared with what had been anticipated based on preoperative imaging and thus influenced surgical decision making in 47% of cases. CONCLUSIONS: AVS is an important procedure in the work up of hyperaldosteronism to help identify and localize metabolically active tumors. It is an additional area in medicine where a vascular surgeon can lend expertise. Success with the procedure improves with experience and should be performed by high volume surgeons.
BACKGROUND: Adrenal venous sampling (AVS) is used to distinguish between bilateral idiopathic hyperplasia and a functional adrenal tumor in patients with hyperaldosteronism. Successful sampling from both adrenal veins is necessary for lateralization and may require more than 1 procedure. AVS has traditionally been performed by interventional radiologists; however, our goal was to examine the outcomes when performed by a vascular surgeon. METHODS: All patients with a diagnosis of hyperaldosteronism were referred for AVS regardless of imaging findings. Cortisol and aldosterone levels were measured in blood samples from both adrenal veins. Postoperative analysis of intraoperative laboratory values before and after cosyntropin administration determined successful cannulation and sampling of each vein. RESULTS: Between 2007 and 2012, 53 patients underwent AVS by one vascular surgeon. The average age was 54 and 63% were men. Our success rate increased with experience, because during the earlier years (2007-2010) primary and secondary success rates were 58% and 68%, respectively compared with later years (2011-2012) when primary and secondary success rates were 82% and 95%, respectively (P<0.05). Results of AVS altered localization of disease compared with what had been anticipated based on preoperative imaging and thus influenced surgical decision making in 47% of cases. CONCLUSIONS: AVS is an important procedure in the work up of hyperaldosteronism to help identify and localize metabolically active tumors. It is an additional area in medicine where a vascular surgeon can lend expertise. Success with the procedure improves with experience and should be performed by high volume surgeons.