| Literature DB >> 24355013 |
Abdolmajid Gholizadeh, Majid Kermani, Mitra Gholami1, Mehdi Farzadkia.
Abstract
The phenolic compounds are known by their carcinogenicity and high toxicity as well as creating unpleasant taste and odor in water resources. The present study develops a cost-effective technology for the treatment of water contaminated with phenolic compounds, including Phenol (Ph), 2-chlorophenol (2-CP), and 4-chlorophenol (4-CP). So, two sorbents, rice bran ash (RBA) and biomass of brown algae, Cystoseiraindica, were used and results were compared with the commercially granular activated carbon (GAC). The phenolic compounds were determined using a high performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) under batch equilibrium conditions. The effects of contact time, pH, initial adsorbate concentration, and adsorbent dosages on the removal efficiency were studied. The adsorption data were simulated by isotherm and kinetic models. Results indicated that RBA and GAC had the lowest efficiency for the removal of 2-CP, while the order of removal efficiency for C. indica biomass was as follows: 2-CP > 4-CP > phenol. The efficiency of GAC was higher than those of other adsorbents for all of the phenolic compounds. Furthermore, the adsorption capacity of RBA was found to be higher than that of C. indica biomass. The optimal initial pH for the removal of phenol, 2-CP and 4-CP was determined to be 5, 7, and 7 for RBA, GAC, and algal biomass, respectively. Kinetic studies suggested that the pseudo-second order best fitted the kinetic data.Entities:
Year: 2013 PMID: 24355013 PMCID: PMC3880076 DOI: 10.1186/2052-336X-11-29
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Environ Health Sci Eng
Figure 1SEM images of (a) biomass (1000×), (b) RBA (250×) and (c) GAC (1000×).
Figure 2Effect of contact time on the removal of phenol, 2-CP and 4-CP by RBA, GAC and algal biomass.
Figure 3Effect of solution pH on the removal of phenol, 2-CP and 4-CP by RBA, GAC and algal biomass.
Comparison of various medium for the adsorption of phenol and its derivatives
| Phenol | 6.3 | 200 | 170 | [ | |
| Phenol | 6 | - | 227 | [ | |
| 2,4,6-TCP | 6 | - | 476 | | |
| phenol | 7 | 240 | 51 | [ | |
| 7 | 240 | 41.5 | | ||
| Phenol | 5 | 120 | 42 | [ | |
| 2-CP | 5 | 120 | 46 | | |
| 4-CP | 5 | 120 | 48 | | |
| phenol | - | 120 | - | | |
| 4-methylphenol | - | 120 | - | [ | |
| 4-methoxyphenol | - | 120 | - | | |
| 4-CP | - | 120 | - | | |
| Phenol | - | 8–10 h | 2 | [ | |
| 2-CP | 6 | 8–10 h | 22 | | |
| 4-CP | 6 | 8–10 h | 24 | | |
| 2,4-DCP | 5 | 1440 | - | [ | |
| Phenol | 6.5 | - | 30.3 | | |
| Phenol | 6.7 | - | 6.6 | [ | |
| 2-CP | 7 | 180 | 0.34 | [ | |
| 3-CP | 8 | 180 | 1.04 | | |
| 4-CP | 8 | 180 | 0.99 | | |
| 2-NP | 8 | 180 | 0.12 | | |
| 2-CP | 1 | - | 281.1 | [ | |
| 4-CP | 1 | - | 287 | | |
| Phenol | 5 | - | 1.7 | [ | |
| Phenol | 5 | 240 | 4.63 | * | |
| 2-CP | 5 | 240 | 3.66 | * | |
| 4-CP | 5 | 240 | 4.30 | * | |
| Phenol | 7 | 120 | 2.14 | * | |
| 2-CP | 7 | 120 | 2.77 | * | |
| 4-CP | 7 | 120 | 2.34 | * | |
| Phenol | 7 | 60 | 4.85 | * | |
| 2-CP | 7 | 60 | 4.28 | * | |
| 4-CP | 7 | 60 | 4.47 | * |
* Current study.
Figure 4Effect of initial phenolic concentration on adsorption/biosorption capacity by RBA, and GAC.
Figure 5Effect of different adsorbent/biosorbent dose on adsorption/biosorption capacity by RBA, and GAC.
Isotherms parameters by linear regression method for the sorption of Ph, 2-CP and 4-CP by RBA, GAC and biomass
| Langmuir | RBA | 5.90 | 0.28 | 0.94 | 13.57 | 2.332 | 51.81 | 0.002 | 0.147 | 176.36 | 160.97 | 27.70 | 0.02 | 0.69 | 9.59 | 4.20 |
| GAC | 10.30 | 0.29 | 0.96 | 1.04 | 1.31 | 12.77 | 0.166 | 0.90 | 3.3 | 3.07 | 20.48 | 0.042 | 0.75 | 11.23 | 8.6 | |
| 3.95 | 0.05 | 0.98 | 1.49 | 1.17 | 9.78 | 0.019 | 0.92 | 4.61 | 2.17 | 18.31 | 0.006 | 0.05 | 2.32 | 1.95 | ||
| models | sorbent type | kF | n | R2 | NSD | ARE | kF | n | R2 | NSD | ARE | kF | n | R2 | NSD | ARE |
| Freundlich | RBA | 3.71 | 10.3 | 0.44 | 7.81 | 0.09 | 0.13 | 1.9 | 0.96 | 4.54 | 0.025 | 0.94 | 1.4 | 0.95 | 6.86 | 0.050 |
| GAC | 1.93 | 5.04 | 0.88 | 2.62 | 2.01 | 3.28 | 2.74 | 0.86 | 4.25 | 3.98 | 1.40 | 1.57 | 0.94 | 1.6 | 1.51 | |
| 0.69 | 2.75 | 0.94 | 1.59 | 439.5 | 0.43 | 1.61 | 0.98 | 2.07 | 1.69 | 0.16 | 1.20 | 0.98 | 1.88 | 1.4 | ||
| models | sorbent type | KT | R2 | NSD | ARE | KT | R2 | NSD | ARE | KT | R2 | NSD | ARE | |||
| Temkin | RBA | 1200 | 0.49 | 0.42 | 8.08 | 0.49 | 0.09 | 4.61 | 0.93 | 7.33 | 1.23 | 0.28 | 4.62 | 0.92 | 11.4 | 0.32 |
| GAC | 0.02 | 0.6 | 0.82 | 9.02 | 8.5 | 0.515 | 0.31 | 0.81 | 6.4 | 5.55 | 274 | 0.195 | 0.88 | 4.11 | 3.7 | |
| 0.91 | 0.46 | 0.93 | 119.3 | 118.5 | 0.17 | 2.22 | 0.96 | 36.4 | 31.1 | 0.103 | 2.53 | 0.97 | 264 | 240 | ||
Kinetic models parameters by linear regression method for the sorption of Ph, 2-CP and 4-CP by RBA, and GAC at 50 mg/L initial Phenols concentration
| Pseudo first order | ||||||||||||||||
| RBA | 1.55 | 0.02 | 0.94 | 79.7 | 74.6 | 1.97 | 0.01 | 0.88 | 66.5 | 60.6 | 0.58 | 0.026 | 0.83 | 105.9 | 99.9 | |
| GAC | 4.28 | 0.04 | 0.94 | 23.2 | 15.7 | 7.25 | 0.02 | 0.93 | 55.3 | 46.4 | 3.3 | 0.03 | 0.89 | 73.5 | 70.9 | |
| 1.24 | 0.003 | 0.37 | 82.3 | 74.7 | 0.59 | 0.0004 | 0.004 | 104.6 | 98.6 | 1.2 | 0.002 | 0.14 | 91.2 | 84.7 | ||
| models | sorbent type | K2 | R2 | NSD | ARE | K2 | R2 | NSD | ARE | K2 | R2 | NSD | ARE | |||
| Pseudo second order | RBA | 4.73 | 0.06 | 0.99 | 4.32 | 0.38 | 3.73 | 0.03 | 0.99 | 10.62 | 3.22 | 4.38 | 0. 20 | 1 | 1.09 | 0.4 |
| GAC | 5.2 | 0.012 | 0.99 | 13.2 | 7.02 | 4.76 | 0.012 | 0.99 | 4.04 | 3.54 | 5.03 | 0.021 | 0.99 | 9.2 | 8.8 | |
| 1.32 | 0.12 | 0.95 | 20.9 | 15.5 | 1.70 | 0.04 | 0.95 | 46.94 | 38.9 | 1.28 | 0.06 | 0.96 | 36.5 | 30.5 | ||
| models | sorbent type | C | R2 | NSD | ARE | C | R2 | NSD | ARE | C | R2 | NSD | ARE | |||
| Intra particle diffusion | RBA | 2.34 | 0.18 | 0.52 | 15.4 | 7.02 | 1.46 | 0.158 | 0.67 | 14.3 | 6.35 | 2.58 | 0.144 | 0.37 | 16.1 | 7.27 |
| GAC | 2.5 | 3.06 | 0.68 | 15.1 | 10.5 | 1.06 | 0.24 | 0.74 | 66.6 | 60.2 | 1.56 | 0.24 | 0.70 | 32.1 | 21.3 | |
| 0.95 | 0.04 | 0.26 | 28.02 | 23.2 | 2.06 | 0.004 | 0.002 | 70.2 | 19.8 | 1.22 | 0.02 | 0.08 | 95.3 | 45.2 | ||