Literature DB >> 24354335

Cervical ripening with Foley catheter for induction of labor after cesarean section: a cohort study.

Marta Jozwiak1, Hilde A van de Lest, Nicole B Burger, Marja G K Dijksterhuis, Jan Willem De Leeuw.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate spontaneous vaginal delivery and complication rates after induction of labor with a transcervical Foley catheter in women with a previous cesarean delivery.
DESIGN: Retrospective cohort study.
SETTING: Secondary teaching hospital in the second largest city of the Netherlands. POPULATION: Women with a history of cesarean delivery (n = 208), undergoing induction of labor with a Foley catheter in a subsequent pregnancy.
MATERIAL AND METHODS: The women who had induction of labor with a transcervical Foley catheter in the Ikazia Hospital, Rotterdam, between January 2003 and January 2012, were identified in a computerized database. Patient's records were checked for accuracy. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Vaginal delivery rate, cesarean section rate, uterine rupture and maternal and neonatal (infectious) morbidity.
RESULTS: Of the women 60% had a spontaneous vaginal delivery and 11% were delivered by vacuum extraction. Uterine rupture occurred in one woman. Postpartum hemorrhage was the most common maternal complication (12%). Maternal intrapartum and postpartum infections occurred in 5% and 1%. Proven neonatal infection was found in 3% of the cases. Two perinatal deaths occurred (1%), of which one was related to uterine rupture.
CONCLUSION: Induction of labor with a transcervical Foley catheter is an effective method to achieve vaginal delivery in women with a previous cesarean delivery. There is a low risk of uterine rupture and maternal and neonatal (infectious) morbidity in this cohort.
© 2013 Nordic Federation of Societies of Obstetrics and Gynecology.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Foley catheter; Vaginal birth after cesarean (VBAC); cesarean section; induction of labor; uterine rupture

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24354335     DOI: 10.1111/aogs.12320

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand        ISSN: 0001-6349            Impact factor:   3.636


  10 in total

1.  Induction of labor by Foley catheter compared with spontaneous onset of labor after previous cesarean section: a cohort study.

Authors:  H Kruit; H Wilkman; A Tekay; L Rahkonen
Journal:  J Perinatol       Date:  2017-04-13       Impact factor: 2.521

2.  Use of Intracervical Foley Catheter for Induction of Labour in Cases of Previous Caesarean Section: Experience of a single tertiary centre in Oman.

Authors:  Hazel Gonsalves; Nihal Al-Riyami; Tamima Al-Dughaishi; Vaidayanathan Gowri; Mohammed Al-Azri; Ayesha Salahuddin
Journal:  Sultan Qaboos Univ Med J       Date:  2016-11-30

3.  Intracervical double-balloon catheter versus dinoprostone for cervical ripening in labor induction in pregnancies with a high risk of uterine hyperstimulation.

Authors:  Javier Vega Cañadas; María Teulón González; Natalia Pagola Limón; María Sanz Alguacil; María García-Luján Prieto; Rocío Canete Riaza; Rosa Montero-Macías
Journal:  Arch Gynecol Obstet       Date:  2021-04-27       Impact factor: 2.344

4.  Outcome of Induction of Labor with Foley's Catheter in Women with Previous One Cesarean Section with Unfavorable Cervix: An Experience From a Tertiary Care Institute in South India.

Authors:  Venkata A RamyaMohana; Gowri Dorairajan
Journal:  J Obstet Gynaecol India       Date:  2021-03-24

5.  Hygroscopic dilators vs balloon catheter ripening of the cervix for induction of labor in nulliparous women at term: Retrospective study.

Authors:  Ryosuke Shindo; Shigeru Aoki; Naohiro Yonemoto; Yuriko Yamamoto; Junko Kasai; Michi Kasai; Etsuko Miyagi
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-12-22       Impact factor: 3.240

6.  Foley catheter for cervical priming in induction of labour at University Obstetrics Unit, Colombo, Sri Lanka: a clinical audit with a patient satisfaction survey.

Authors:  M Patabendige; A Jayawardane
Journal:  BMC Res Notes       Date:  2017-04-12

7.  Double-balloon catheter for induction of labour in women with a previous cesarean section, could it be the best choice?

Authors:  Carlos De Bonrostro Torralba; Eva Lucía Tejero Cabrejas; Sabina Marti Gamboa; María Lapresta Moros; Jose Manuel Campillos Maza; Sergio Castán Mateo
Journal:  Arch Gynecol Obstet       Date:  2017-03-18       Impact factor: 2.344

8.  Balloon catheter for induction of labor in women with one previous cesarean and an unfavorable cervix.

Authors:  Claartje M A Huisman; Mieke L G Ten Eikelder; Kelly Mast; Katrien Oude Rengerink; Marta Jozwiak; Frédérique van Dunné; Johannes J Duvekot; Jim van Eyck; Ingrid Gaugler-Senden; Christianne J M de Groot; Maureen T M Franssen; Nicolette van Gemund; Josje Langenveld; Jan Willem de Leeuw; Eefje J Oude Lohuis; Martijn A Oudijk; Dimitri Papatsonis; Mariëlle van Pampus; Martina Porath; Sabina Rombout-de Weerd; Jos J van Roosmalen; Paulien C M van der Salm; Hubertina C J Scheepers; Marko J Sikkema; Jan Sporken; Rob H Stigter; Wim J van Wijngaarden; Mallory Woiski; Ben Willem J Mol; Kitty W M Bloemenkamp
Journal:  Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand       Date:  2019-03-07       Impact factor: 3.636

9.  MEchanical DIlatation of the Cervix-- in a Scarred uterus (MEDICS): the study protocol of a randomised controlled trial comparing a single cervical catheter balloon and prostaglandin PGE2 for cervical ripening and labour induction following caesarean delivery.

Authors:  Soe-Na Choo; Abhiram Kanneganti; Muhammad Nur Dinie Bin Abdul Aziz; Leta Loh; Carol Hargreaves; Vikneswaran Gopal; Arijit Biswas; Yiong Huak Chan; Ida Suzani Ismail; Claudia Chi; Citra Mattar
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2019-11-06       Impact factor: 2.692

10.  Intrapartum interventions that affect maternal and neonatal outcomes for vaginal birth after cesarean section.

Authors:  Shao-Wen Wu; He Dian; Wei-Yuan Zhang
Journal:  J Int Med Res       Date:  2019-11-03       Impact factor: 1.671

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.