Literature DB >> 24353301

Central auditory neurons display flexible feature recombination functions.

Andrei S Kozlov1, Timothy Q Gentner.   

Abstract

Recognition of natural stimuli requires a combination of selectivity and invariance. Classical neurobiological models achieve selectivity and invariance, respectively, by assigning to each cortical neuron either a computation equivalent to the logical "AND" or a computation equivalent to the logical "OR." One powerful OR-like operation is the MAX function, which computes the maximum over input activities. The MAX function is frequently employed in computer vision to achieve invariance and considered a key operation in visual cortex. Here we explore the computations for selectivity and invariance in the auditory system of a songbird, using natural stimuli. We ask two related questions: does the MAX operation exist in auditory system? Is it implemented by specialized "MAX" neurons, as assumed in vision? By analyzing responses of individual neurons to combinations of stimuli we systematically sample the space of implemented feature recombination functions. Although we frequently observe the MAX function, we show that the same neurons that implement it also readily implement other operations, including the AND-like response. We then show that sensory adaptation, a ubiquitous property of neural circuits, causes transitions between these operations in individual neurons, violating the fixed neuron-to-computation mapping posited in the state-of-the-art object-recognition models. These transitions, however, accord with predictions of neural-circuit models incorporating divisive normalization and variable polynomial nonlinearities at the spike threshold. Because these biophysical properties are not tied to a particular sensory modality but are generic, the flexible neuron-to-computation mapping demonstrated in this study in the auditory system is likely a general property.

Keywords:  MAX function; adaptation; auditory system; object-recognition models

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 24353301      PMCID: PMC3949310          DOI: 10.1152/jn.00637.2013

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Neurophysiol        ISSN: 0022-3077            Impact factor:   2.714


  28 in total

1.  Rapid adaptation in visual cortex to the structure of images.

Authors:  J R Müller; A B Metha; J Krauskopf; P Lennie
Journal:  Science       Date:  1999-08-27       Impact factor: 47.728

2.  Receptive fields, binocular interaction and functional architecture in the cat's visual cortex.

Authors:  D H HUBEL; T N WIESEL
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  1962-01       Impact factor: 5.182

3.  Competitive dynamics in cortical responses to visual stimuli.

Authors:  Samat Moldakarimov; Julianne E Rollenhagen; Carl R Olson; Carson C Chow
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2005-06-08       Impact factor: 2.714

Review 4.  Auditory processing of vocal sounds in birds.

Authors:  Frédéric E Theunissen; Sarita S Shaevitz
Journal:  Curr Opin Neurobiol       Date:  2006-07-13       Impact factor: 6.627

5.  A feedforward architecture accounts for rapid categorization.

Authors:  Thomas Serre; Aude Oliva; Tomaso Poggio
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2007-04-02       Impact factor: 11.205

6.  A canonical neural circuit for cortical nonlinear operations.

Authors:  Minjoon Kouh; Tomaso Poggio
Journal:  Neural Comput       Date:  2008-06       Impact factor: 2.026

7.  Attentional modulation of adaptation in V4.

Authors:  Andrew E Hudson; Nicholas D Schiff; Jonathan D Victor; Keith P Purpura
Journal:  Eur J Neurosci       Date:  2009-06-25       Impact factor: 3.386

Review 8.  Attention in hierarchical models of object recognition.

Authors:  Dirk B Walther; Christof Koch
Journal:  Prog Brain Res       Date:  2007       Impact factor: 2.453

9.  Decrements in auditory responses to a repeated conspecific song are long-lasting and require two periods of protein synthesis in the songbird forebrain.

Authors:  S J Chew; C Mello; F Nottebohm; E Jarvis; D S Vicario
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1995-04-11       Impact factor: 11.205

10.  Nonoverlapping sets of synapses drive on responses and off responses in auditory cortex.

Authors:  Ben Scholl; Xiang Gao; Michael Wehr
Journal:  Neuron       Date:  2010-02-11       Impact factor: 17.173

View more
  7 in total

1.  Central auditory neurons have composite receptive fields.

Authors:  Andrei S Kozlov; Timothy Q Gentner
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2016-01-19       Impact factor: 11.205

2.  Hierarchical emergence of sequence sensitivity in the songbird auditory forebrain.

Authors:  Satoko Ono; Kazuo Okanoya; Yoshimasa Seki
Journal:  J Comp Physiol A Neuroethol Sens Neural Behav Physiol       Date:  2016-02-10       Impact factor: 1.836

3.  Subthreshold membrane responses underlying sparse spiking to natural vocal signals in auditory cortex.

Authors:  Krista E Perks; Timothy Q Gentner
Journal:  Eur J Neurosci       Date:  2015-03       Impact factor: 3.386

4.  Norepinephrine enhances song responsiveness and encoding in the auditory forebrain of male zebra finches.

Authors:  Vanessa Lee; Benjamin A Pawlisch; Matheus Macedo-Lima; Luke Remage-Healey
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2017-10-11       Impact factor: 2.714

5.  Mismatch Responses Evoked by Sound Pattern Violation in the Songbird Forebrain Suggest Common Auditory Processing With Human.

Authors:  Chihiro Mori; Kazuo Okanoya
Journal:  Front Physiol       Date:  2022-03-03       Impact factor: 4.566

6.  Comodulation Enhances Signal Detection via Priming of Auditory Cortical Circuits.

Authors:  Joseph Sollini; Paul Chadderton
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2016-12-07       Impact factor: 6.167

Review 7.  Recent advances in understanding the auditory cortex.

Authors:  Andrew J King; Sundeep Teki; Ben D B Willmore
Journal:  F1000Res       Date:  2018-09-26
  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.