Literature DB >> 24353116

Antibiotic use for irreversible pulpitis.

Zbys Fedorowicz1, Esther J van Zuuren, Allan G Farman, Anirudha Agnihotry, Jassim Hasan Al-Langawi.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Irreversible pulpitis, which is characterised by acute and intense pain, is one of the most frequent reasons that patients attend for emergency dental care. Apart from removal of the tooth, the customary way of relieving the pain of irreversible pulpitis is by drilling into the tooth, removing the inflamed pulp (nerve) and cleaning the root canal. However, a significant number of dentists continue to prescribe antibiotics to stop the pain of irreversible pulpitis.
OBJECTIVES: To assess the effects of systemic antibiotics for irreversible pulpitis. SEARCH
METHODS: We searched the Cochrane Oral Health Group's Trials Register (to 5 September 2013); the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL) (The Cochrane Library 2013, Issue 9); MEDLINE via OVID (1946 to 5 September 2013); EMBASE via OVID (1980 to 5 September 2013) and the US National Institutes of Health Trials Register (http://clinicaltrials.gov). There were no language restrictions in the searches of the electronic databases. SELECTION CRITERIA: Randomised controlled trials which compared pain relief with systemic antibiotics and analgesics, against placebo and analgesics in the acute preoperative phase of irreversible pulpitis. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: Two review authors screened studies and extracted data independently. We assessed the quality of the evidence of included studies using GRADEPro software. Pooling of data was not possible and a descriptive summary is presented. MAIN
RESULTS: One trial assessed at low risk of bias, involving 40 participants was included in this update of the review. The quality of the body of evidence was rated low for the different outcomes. There was a close parallel distribution of the pain ratings in both the intervention and placebo groups over the seven-day study period. There was insufficient evidence to claim or refute a benefit for penicillin for pain intensity. There was no significant difference in the mean total number of ibuprofen tablets over the study period: 9.2 (standard deviation (SD) 6.02) in the penicillin group versus 9.6 (SD 6.34) in the placebo group; mean difference -0.40 (95% confidence interval (CI) -4.23 to 3.43; P value = 0.84). This applied equally for the mean total number of Tylenol tablets: 6.9 (SD 6.87) used in the penicillin group versus 4.45 (SD 4.82) in the placebo group; mean difference 2.45 (95% CI -1.23 to 6.13; P value = 0.19). Our secondary outcome on reporting of adverse events was not addressed in this study. AUTHORS'
CONCLUSIONS: This systematic review which was based on one low powered small sample trial assessed as a low risk of bias, illustrates that there is insufficient evidence to determine whether antibiotics reduce pain or not compared to not having antibiotics. The results of this review confirm the necessity for further larger sample and methodologically sound trials that can provide additional evidence as to whether antibiotics, prescribed in the preoperative phase, can affect treatment outcomes for irreversible pulpitis.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2013        PMID: 24353116     DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD004969.pub3

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev        ISSN: 1361-6137


  9 in total

1.  Antibiotic Prescriptions Associated With Dental-Related Emergency Department Visits.

Authors:  Rebecca M Roberts; Adam L Hersh; Daniel J Shapiro; Katherine E Fleming-Dutra; Lauri A Hicks
Journal:  Ann Emerg Med       Date:  2018-11-02       Impact factor: 5.721

2.  Antibiotic use for irreversible pulpitis.

Authors:  Anirudha Agnihotry; Wendy Thompson; Zbys Fedorowicz; Esther J van Zuuren; Julie Sprakel
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2019-05-30

3.  Antibiotic prescribing by general dentists in the United States, 2013.

Authors:  Rebecca M Roberts; Monina Bartoces; Sydney E Thompson; Lauri A Hicks
Journal:  J Am Dent Assoc       Date:  2017-01-23       Impact factor: 3.634

4.  Dental consultations in UK general practice and antibiotic prescribing rates: a retrospective cohort study.

Authors:  Anwen L Cope; Ivor G Chestnutt; Fiona Wood; Nick A Francis
Journal:  Br J Gen Pract       Date:  2016-03-29       Impact factor: 5.386

5.  Antimicrobial prescribing by dentists in Wales, UK: findings of the first cycle of a clinical audit.

Authors:  A L Cope; E Barnes; E P Howells; A M Rockey; A J Karki; M J Wilson; M A O Lewis; J G Cowpe
Journal:  Br Dent J       Date:  2016-07-08       Impact factor: 1.626

6.  Factors associated with no dental treatment in preschoolers with toothache: a cross-sectional study in outpatient public emergency services.

Authors:  Geovanna C M Machado; Anelise Daher; Luciane R Costa
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2014-08-08       Impact factor: 3.390

7.  Influence of Qualification and Practice Settings of Dental Practitioners on Antimicrobial Prescribing in Delhi and National Capital Region, India.

Authors:  Himika Wasan; Pooja Gupta; Apoorva Mathur; Ekta Mutneja; Vijay Prakash Mathur; Yogendra Kumar Gupta
Journal:  J Nat Sci Biol Med       Date:  2017 Jul-Dec

8.  Comparison of the Views of the General Dental Practitioners and Dental Interns in Asir, Saudi Arabia on Antibiotic Prescription for Endodontic Therapy: A Cross-Sectional Study.

Authors:  Mohammed A Alobaid; Saad Alobaid; Mohammed Alshahrani
Journal:  Infect Drug Resist       Date:  2021-08-08       Impact factor: 4.003

9.  Antibiotic and opioid prescribing for dental-related conditions in emergency departments: United States, 2012 through 2014.

Authors:  Rebecca M Roberts; Michele K Bohm; Monina G Bartoces; Katherine E Fleming-Dutra; Lauri A Hicks; Natalia I Chalmers
Journal:  J Am Dent Assoc       Date:  2020-01-17       Impact factor: 3.454

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.