Literature DB >> 24352956

Variation among sows in response to porcine reproductive and respiratory syndrome.

H Rashidi1, H A Mulder, P Mathur, J A M van Arendonk, E F Knol.   

Abstract

Porcine reproductive and respiratory syndrome (PRRS) is a viral disease with negative impacts on reproduction of sows. Genetic selection to improve the response of sows to PRRS could be an approach to control the disease. Determining sow response to PRRS requires knowing pathogen burden and sow performance. In practice, though, records of pathogen burden are unavailable. We develop a statistical method to distinguish healthy and disease phases and to develop a method to quantify sows' responses to PRRS without having individual pathogen burden. We analyzed 10,910 sows with 57,135 repeated records of reproduction performance. Disease phases were recognized as strong deviation of herd-year-week estimates for reproduction traits using two methods: Method 1 used raw weekly averages of the herd; Method 2 used a linear model with fixed effects for seasonality, parity, and year, and random effects for herd-year-week and sow. The variation of sows in response to PRRS was quantified using 2 models on the traits number of piglets born alive (NBA) and number of piglets born dead (LOSS): 1) bivariate model considering the trait in healthy and disease phases as different traits, and 2) reaction norm model modeling the response of sows as a linear regression of the trait on herd-year-week estimates of NBA. The linear model for NBA had the highest sensitivity (78%) for disease phases. Residual variances of both were more than doubled in the disease phase compared with the healthy phase. Trait correlations between healthy and disease phases deviated from unity (0.57 ± 0.13 - 0.87 ± 0.18). In the bivariate model, repeatabilities were lower in disease phase compared with healthy phase (0.07 ± 0.027 and 0.16 ± 0.005 for NBA; 0.07 ± 0.027 and 0.09 ± 0.004 for LOSS). The reaction norm model fitted the data better than the bivariate model based on Akaike's information criterion, and had also higher predictive ability in disease phase based on cross validation. Our results show that the linear model is a practical method to distinguish between healthy and disease phases in farm data. We showed that there is variation among sows in response to PRRS, implying possibilities for selection, and the reaction norm model is a good model to study the response of animals toward diseases.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 24352956     DOI: 10.2527/jas.2013-6889

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Anim Sci        ISSN: 0021-8812            Impact factor:   3.159


  10 in total

1.  Quantifying the health challenges in an Australian piggery using medication records for the definition of disease resilience1.

Authors:  Sarita Z Y Guy; Li Li; Peter C Thomson; Susanne Hermesch
Journal:  J Anim Sci       Date:  2019-03-01       Impact factor: 3.159

2.  Genomic Selection Improves Response to Selection in Resilience by Exploiting Genotype by Environment Interactions.

Authors:  Han A Mulder
Journal:  Front Genet       Date:  2016-10-13       Impact factor: 4.599

3.  Opportunities to Improve Resilience in Animal Breeding Programs.

Authors:  Tom V L Berghof; Marieke Poppe; Han A Mulder
Journal:  Front Genet       Date:  2019-01-14       Impact factor: 4.599

4.  Genetic analysis of reproductive performance in sows during porcine reproductive and respiratory syndrome (PRRS) and porcine epidemic diarrhea (PED) outbreaks.

Authors:  Cassandra L Scanlan; Austin M Putz; Kent A Gray; Nick V L Serão
Journal:  J Anim Sci Biotechnol       Date:  2019-03-01

Review 5.  Key Gaps in the Knowledge of the Porcine Respiratory Reproductive Syndrome Virus (PRRSV).

Authors:  Sergio Montaner-Tarbes; Hernando A Del Portillo; María Montoya; Lorenzo Fraile
Journal:  Front Vet Sci       Date:  2019-02-20

6.  Genetic analysis of disease resilience of wean-to-finish pigs under a natural disease challenge model using reaction norms.

Authors:  Jian Cheng; KyuSang Lim; Austin M Putz; Anna Wolc; John C S Harding; Michael K Dyck; Frederic Fortin; Graham S Plastow; Jack C M Dekkers
Journal:  Genet Sel Evol       Date:  2022-02-08       Impact factor: 4.297

7.  Revealing new candidate genes for reproductive traits in pigs: combining Bayesian GWAS and functional pathways.

Authors:  Lucas L Verardo; Fabyano F Silva; Marcos S Lopes; Ole Madsen; John W M Bastiaansen; Egbert F Knol; Mathew Kelly; Luis Varona; Paulo S Lopes; Simone E F Guimarães
Journal:  Genet Sel Evol       Date:  2016-02-01       Impact factor: 4.297

8.  The effect of a porcine reproductive and respiratory syndrome outbreak on genetic parameters and reaction norms for reproductive performance in pigs1.

Authors:  Austin M Putz; Clint R Schwab; Alysta D Sewell; Derald J Holtkamp; Jeffery J Zimmerman; Kimberlee Baker; Nick V L Serão; Jack C M Dekkers
Journal:  J Anim Sci       Date:  2019-03-01       Impact factor: 3.159

9.  Using PRRSV-Resilient Sows Improve Performance in Endemic Infected Farms with Recurrent Outbreaks.

Authors:  Gloria Abella; Adela Pagès-Bernaus; Joan Estany; Ramona Natacha Pena; Lorenzo Fraile; Lluis Miquel Plà-Aragonés
Journal:  Animals (Basel)       Date:  2021-03-08       Impact factor: 2.752

Review 10.  Genome Editing Strategies to Protect Livestock from Viral Infections.

Authors:  Jenny-Helena Söllner; Thomas C Mettenleiter; Björn Petersen
Journal:  Viruses       Date:  2021-10-04       Impact factor: 5.048

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.