Literature DB >> 24351181

Predicting glucose sensor behavior in blood using transport modeling: relative impacts of protein biofouling and cellular metabolic effects.

Matthew T Novak1, Fan Yuan, William M Reichert.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Tissue response to indwelling glucose sensors remains a confounding barrier to clinical application. While the effects of fully formed capsular tissue on sensor response have been studied, little has been done to understand how tissue interactions occurring before capsule formation hinder sensor performance. Upon insertion in subcutaneous tissue, the sensor is initially exposed to blood, blood borne constituents, and interstitial fluid. Using human whole blood as a simple ex vivo experimental system, the effects of protein accumulation at the sensor surface (biofouling effects) and cellular consumption of glucose in both the biofouling layer and in the bulk (metabolic effects) on sensor response were assessed.
METHODS: Medtronic MiniMed SofSensor glucose sensors were incubated in whole blood, plasma-diluted whole blood, and cell-free platelet-poor plasma (PPP) to analyze the impact of different blood constituents on sensor function. Experimental conditions were then simulated using MATLAB to predict the relative impacts of biofouling and metabolic effects on the observed sensor responses.
RESULTS: Protein biofouling in PPP in both the experiments and the simulations was found to have no interfering effect upon sensor response. Experimental results obtained with whole and dilute blood showed that the sensor response was markedly affected by blood borne glucose-consuming cells accumulated in the biofouling layer and in the surrounding bulk.
CONCLUSIONS: The physical barrier to glucose transport presented by protein biofouling does not hinder glucose movement to the sensor surface, and the consumption of glucose by inflammatory cells, and not erythrocytes, proximal to the sensor surface has a substantial effect on sensor response and may be the main culprit for anomalous sensor behavior immediately following implantation.
© 2013 Diabetes Technology Society.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2013        PMID: 24351181      PMCID: PMC3876333          DOI: 10.1177/193229681300700615

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Diabetes Sci Technol        ISSN: 1932-2968


  31 in total

Review 1.  Guide to anticoagulant therapy: Heparin : a statement for healthcare professionals from the American Heart Association.

Authors:  J Hirsh; S S Anand; J L Halperin; V Fuster
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  2001-06-19       Impact factor: 29.690

2.  Comparison of platelet, leukocyte, and growth factor levels in point-of-care platelet-enriched plasma, prepared using a modified Curasan kit, with preparations received from a local blood bank.

Authors:  Gernot Weibrich; Wilfried K G Kleis; Gerd Hafner; W E Hitzler; Wilfried Wagner
Journal:  Clin Oral Implants Res       Date:  2003-06       Impact factor: 5.977

Review 3.  Facilitated diffusion of glucose.

Authors:  A Carruthers
Journal:  Physiol Rev       Date:  1990-10       Impact factor: 37.312

4.  Oxygen-dependent microbial killing by phagocytes (first of two parts).

Authors:  B M Babior
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  1978-03-23       Impact factor: 91.245

5.  Metabolic biofouling of glucose sensors in vivo: role of tissue microhemorrhages.

Authors:  Ulrike Klueh; Zenghe Liu; Ben Feldman; Timothy P Henning; Brian Cho; Tianmei Ouyang; Don Kreutzer
Journal:  J Diabetes Sci Technol       Date:  2011-05-01

6.  Engineering the tissue which encapsulates subcutaneous implants. II. Plasma-tissue exchange properties.

Authors:  A A Sharkawy; B Klitzman; G A Truskey; W M Reichert
Journal:  J Biomed Mater Res       Date:  1998-06-15

7.  Decreased analyte transport through implanted membranes: differentiation of biofouling from tissue effects.

Authors:  N Wisniewski; B Klitzman; B Miller; W M Reichert
Journal:  J Biomed Mater Res       Date:  2001-12-15

8.  Modeling the relative impact of capsular tissue effects on implanted glucose sensor time lag and signal attenuation.

Authors:  Matthew T Novak; Fan Yuan; William M Reichert
Journal:  Anal Bioanal Chem       Date:  2010-08-28       Impact factor: 4.142

9.  Haemocompatibility evaluation of DLC- and SiC-coated surfaces.

Authors:  N Nurdin; P François; Y Mugnier; J Krumeich; M Moret; B-O Aronsson; P Descouts
Journal:  Eur Cell Mater       Date:  2003-06-20       Impact factor: 3.942

10.  Effects of macrophage colony-stimulating factor and phorbol myristate acetate on 2-D-deoxyglucose transport and superoxide production in rat peritoneal macrophages.

Authors:  R J Rist; G E Jones; R J Naftalin
Journal:  Biochem J       Date:  1991-08-15       Impact factor: 3.857

View more
  10 in total

1.  Characterization of porous, dexamethasone-releasing polyurethane coatings for glucose sensors.

Authors:  Suzana G Vallejo-Heligon; Bruce Klitzman; William M Reichert
Journal:  Acta Biomater       Date:  2014-07-25       Impact factor: 8.947

Review 2.  In Vivo Chemical Sensors: Role of Biocompatibility on Performance and Utility.

Authors:  Robert J Soto; Jackson R Hall; Micah D Brown; James B Taylor; Mark H Schoenfisch
Journal:  Anal Chem       Date:  2016-11-21       Impact factor: 6.986

3.  Modeling the Physiological Factors Affecting Glucose Sensor Function in Vivo.

Authors:  Matthew T Novak; William M Reichert
Journal:  J Diabetes Sci Technol       Date:  2015-06-30

Review 4.  Semi-Implantable Bioelectronics.

Authors:  Jiaru Fang; Shuang Huang; Fanmao Liu; Gen He; Xiangling Li; Xinshuo Huang; Hui-Jiuan Chen; Xi Xie
Journal:  Nanomicro Lett       Date:  2022-05-28

5.  Cell based metabolic barriers to glucose diffusion: macrophages and continuous glucose monitoring.

Authors:  Ulrike Klueh; Jackman T Frailey; Yi Qiao; Omar Antar; Donald L Kreutzer
Journal:  Biomaterials       Date:  2014-01-22       Impact factor: 12.479

6.  Redundancy in Glucose Sensing: Enhanced Accuracy and Reliability of an Electrochemical Redundant Sensor for Continuous Glucose Monitoring.

Authors:  Amin Sharifi; Andrea Varsavsky; Johanna Ulloa; Jodie C Horsburgh; Sybil A McAuley; Balasubramanian Krishnamurthy; Alicia J Jenkins; Peter G Colman; Glenn M Ward; Richard J MacIsaac; Rajiv Shah; David N O'Neal
Journal:  J Diabetes Sci Technol       Date:  2016-05-03

7.  Macrophage embedded fibrin gels: an in vitro platform for assessing inflammation effects on implantable glucose sensors.

Authors:  Matthew T Novak; Fan Yuan; William M Reichert
Journal:  Biomaterials       Date:  2014-08-28       Impact factor: 12.479

8.  Impact of CCL2 and CCR2 chemokine/receptor deficiencies on macrophage recruitment and continuous glucose monitoring in vivo.

Authors:  Ulrike Klueh; Caroline Czajkowski; Izabela Ludzinska; Yi Qiao; Jackman Frailey; Donald L Kreutzer
Journal:  Biosens Bioelectron       Date:  2016-06-23       Impact factor: 10.618

9.  Fibrotic Encapsulation Is the Dominant Source of Continuous Glucose Monitor Delays.

Authors:  P Mason McClatchey; Ethan S McClain; Ian M Williams; Carlo M Malabanan; Freyja D James; Peter C Lord; Justin M Gregory; David E Cliffel; David H Wasserman
Journal:  Diabetes       Date:  2019-08-09       Impact factor: 9.461

Review 10.  Advanced strategies to thwart foreign body response to implantable devices.

Authors:  Simone Capuani; Gulsah Malgir; Corrine Ying Xuan Chua; Alessandro Grattoni
Journal:  Bioeng Transl Med       Date:  2022-03-02
  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.