| Literature DB >> 24350825 |
Ying-Si Lai, Xiao-Nong Zhou, Jürg Utzinger, Penelope Vounatsou1.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Soil-transmitted helminth infections affect tens of millions of individuals in the People's Republic of China (P.R. China). There is a need for high-resolution estimates of at-risk areas and number of people infected to enhance spatial targeting of control interventions. However, such information is not yet available for P.R. China.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2013 PMID: 24350825 PMCID: PMC3892068 DOI: 10.1186/1756-3305-6-359
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Parasit Vectors ISSN: 1756-3305 Impact factor: 3.876
Remote sensing data sources
| MODIS/Terrab | LSTj | 2001-2012 | 8 days | 1 km |
| MODIS/Terrab | NDVIk | 2001-2012 | 16 days | 1 km |
| MODIS/Terrab | Land cover | 2001-2004 | Yearly | 1 km |
| WorldClimc | Elevation | 2000 | - | 1 km |
| WorldClimc | Precipitation | 1950-2000 | Monthly | 1 km |
| SWBDd | Water bodies | 2000 | - | 30 m |
| Köppen-Geigere | Climate zones | 1976-2000 | - | 50 km |
| ISRICf | Soil types | - | - | 8 km |
| Atlas of the biosphereg | Soil-moisture | 1950-1999 | - | 50 km |
| SEDACh | Population data | 2000; 2010 | - | 5 km |
| SEDACh | HIIl | 1995-2004 | - | 1 km |
| SEDACh | Urban extents | 1990-2000 | - | 1 km |
| China yearbooki | GDP per capita | 2008 | - | County-level |
aLand cover data accessed on June 1, 2011; all other data accessed on April 1, 2013.
bModerate Resolution Imaging Spectroradiometer (MODIS)/Terra; available at: https://lpdaac.usgs.gov/.
cAvailable at: http://www.worldclim.org/current.
dShuttle Radar Topography Mission Water Body Data (SWBD); available at: http://gis.ess.washington.edu/data/vector/worldshore/index.html.
eWorld maps of Köppen-Geiger climate classification; available at: http://koeppen-geiger.vu-wien.ac.at/shifts.htm.
fInternational Soil Reference and Information Center; available at: http://www.isric.org/data/isric-wise-derived-soil-properties-5-5-arc-minutes-global-grid-version-12.
gAvailable at: http://www.sage.wisc.edu/atlas/maps.php?datasetid=23&includerelatedlinks=1&dataset=23.
hSocioeconomic Data and Applications Center;available at: http://sedac.ciesin.org/.
iChina Yearbook full-text database; available at: http://acad.cnki.net/Kns55/brief/result.aspx?dbPrefix=CYFD.
jLand surface temperature (LST) day and night.
kNormalized difference vegetation index.
lHuman influence index.
Overview of the number of soil-transmitted helminth surveys
| Location types | Village/town | 842 (72.8) | 822 (72.2) | 838 (70.6) |
| County | 315 (27.2) | 316 (27.8) | 349 (29.4) | |
| Year of survey | 2000-2004 | 739 (63.9) | 737 (64.8) | 775 (65.3) |
| 2005-2010 | 418 (36.1) | 401 (35.2) | 412 (34.7) | |
| Diagnostic method | Kato-Katz | 1124 (97.2) | 1112 (97.7) | 1151 (97.0) |
| Stool sedimentation | 3 (0.26) | 3 (0.26) | 3 (0.25) | |
| Flotation methoda | 16 (1.4) | 16 (1.4) | 19 (1.6) | |
| Ether-concentrationb | 1 (0.09) | 1 (0.09) | 1 (0.08) | |
| Other diagnostic method | 13 (1.1) | 6 (0.53) | 13 (1.1) | |
| Observed prevalence (%) | <0.1 | 126 (10.9) | 374 (32.9) | 364 (30.7) |
| 0.1-5.0 | 513 (44.3) | 523 (46.0) | 396 (33.4) | |
| 5.1-10.0 | 152 (13.1) | 95 (8.4) | 149 (12.6) | |
| 10.1-20.0 | 158 (13.7) | 71 (6.2) | 134 (11.3) | |
| 20.1-50.0 | 155 (13.4) | 58 (5.1) | 118 (10.0) | |
| >50.0 | 53 (4.6) | 17 (1.5) | 26 (2.2) | |
| Total | 1,157 (100) | 1,138 (100) | 1,187 (100) | |
aStool flotation method or McMaster salt flotation method.
bFormalin ethyl acetate concentration method.
Figure 1Survey locations and observed prevalence across P.R. China. The maps show the survey locations and observed prevalence for (A) A. lumbricoides, (B) T. trichiura and (C) hookworm.
Posterior summaries (median and 95% BCI) of the geostatistical model parameters for
| Year | 0.34 (0.32; 0.36)* |
| GDP per capita (yuan) | |
| ≤12,000 | 1.00 |
| 12,000-24,000 | 0.89 (0.68; 1.18) |
| >24,000 | 0.59 (0.41; 0.86)* |
| Elevation (m) | |
| ≤55 | 1.00 |
| 55-400 | 1.21 (0.89; 1.63) |
| >400 | 1.54 (0.96; 2.46) |
| NDVI | |
| ≤0.45 | 1.00 |
| 0.45-0.55 | 2.41 (2.05; 2.84)* |
| >0.55 | 1.30 (1.03; 1.64)* |
| LST at day (°C) | |
| ≤21 | 1.00 |
| 21-23 | 1.07 (0.83; 1.37) |
| >23 | 1.08 (0.76; 1.54) |
| Climatic zone | |
| Warm | 1.00 |
| Equatorial | 1.73 (0.42; 7.08) |
| Arid | 0.41 (0.18; 0.98)* |
| Snow/polar | 0.41 (0.20; 0.84)* |
| Range (km) | 243.1 (182.8; 321.4) |
| Spatial variance ( | 2.64 (1.97; 3.51) |
| Non-spatial variance ( | 0.91 (0.77; 1.08) |
†Regression coefficients are provided as odds ratios.
*Significant correlation based on 95% Bayesian credible interval (BCI).
Posterior summaries (median and 95% BCI) of the geostatistical model parameters for
| Year | 0.26 (0.24; 0.28)* |
| GDP per capita | 1.02 (0.83; 1.25) |
| Elevation | 1.80 (1.37; 2.37)* |
| NDVI | |
| ≤0.45 | 1.00 |
| 0.45-0.55 | 2.64 (1.99; 3.52)* |
| >0.55 | 1.59 (1.10; 2.32)* |
| LST at day | 0.62 (0.48; 0.81)* |
| LST at night | 3.61 (2.08; 6.32)* |
| Precipitation | 1.23 (0.79; 1.91) |
| pH measured in water | |
| ≤5.95 | 1.00 |
| 5.95-7.00 | 1.39 (1.00; 1.95) |
| >7.00 | 1.49 (0.96; 2.30) |
| Climatic zone | |
| Warm | 1.00 |
| Equatorial | 6.40 (1.25; 31.49)* |
| Arid | 0.10 (0.03; 0.36)* |
| Snow/polar | 0.07 (0.02; 0.22)* |
| Range (km) | 138.8 (104.3; 179.1) |
| Spatial variance ( | 4.19 (3.22; 5.08) |
| Non-spatial variance ( | 1.09 (0.88; 1.37) |
†Regression coefficients are provided as odds ratios.
*Significant correlation based on 95% Bayesian credible interval (BCI).
Posterior summaries (median and 95% BCI) of the geostatistical model parameters for hookworm
| Year | 0.27 (0.25; 0.29)* |
| GDP per capita (yuan) | |
| ≤12,000 | 1.00 |
| 12,000-24,000 | 1.28 (0.89; 1.85) |
| >24,000 | 0.89 (0.53; 1.50) |
| Elevation (m) | |
| ≤55 | 1.00 |
| 55-400 | 1.34 (0.91; 1.98) |
| >400 | 1.32 (0.73; 2.38) |
| NDVI | |
| ≤0.45 | 1.00 |
| 0.45-0.55 | 0.44 (0.36; 0.52)* |
| >0.55 | 0.36 (0.27; 0.47)* |
| LST at day | 0.32 (0.23; 0.45)* |
| LST at night | 7.35 (3.88; 14.12)* |
| Precipitation | 3.17 (1.89; 5.48)* |
| Bulk density (km/dm3) | |
| ≤1.29 | 1.00 |
| 1.29-1.36 | 0.82 (0.52; 1.30) |
| >1.36 | 0.66 (0.37; 1.17) |
| Gypsum content (g/kg) | |
| ≤0 | 1.00 |
| 0-1 | 1.20 (0.88; 1.63) |
| >1 | 1.17 (0.73; 1.87) |
| Organic carbon content (g/kg) | |
| ≤11 | 1.00 |
| 11-12.5 | 0.73 (0.44; 1.20) |
| >12.5 | 0.81 (0.46; 1.43) |
| Climatic zone | |
| Warm | 1.00 |
| Equatorial | 1.87 (0.34; 10.13) |
| Arid | 0.17 (0.03; 0.83)* |
| Snow/polar | 0.05 (0.01; 0.21)* |
| Land cover | |
| Cropland | 1.00 |
| Forest | 0.83 (0.57; 1.22) |
| Shrubland and savanna | 1.07 (0.67; 1.70) |
| Grassland | 0.63 (0.13; 2.58) |
| Urban | 0.35 (0.22; 0.58)* |
| Wet areas | 0.15 (0.07; 0.32)* |
| Range (km) | 186.1 (126.8; 296.5) |
| Spatial variance ( | 5.07 (3.72; 6.63) |
| Non-spatial variance ( | 0.88 (0.69; 1.22) |
†Regression coefficients are provided as odds ratios.
*Significant correlation based on 95% Bayesian credible interval (BCI).
Figure 2The geographical distribution of infection risk in P.R. China. The maps show the situation from 2005 onwards based on the median and standard deviation of the posterior predictive distribution. Estimates of (A) infection prevalence, (B) prediction uncertainty and (C) number of infected individuals.
Figure 3The geographical distribution of infection risk in P.R. China. The maps show the situation from 2005 onwards based on the median and standard deviation of the posterior predictive distribution. Estimates of (A) infection prevalence, (B) prediction uncertainty and (C) number of infected individuals.
Figure 4The geographical distribution of hookworm infection risk in P.R. China. The maps show the situation from 2005 onwards based on the median and standard deviation of the posterior predictive distribution. Estimates of (A) infection prevalence, (B) prediction uncertainty and (C) number of infected individuals.
Figure 5The geographical distribution of soil-transmitted helminth infection risk in P.R. China. The maps show the situation from 2005 onwards based on the median and standard deviation of the posterior predictive distribution. Estimates of (A) infection prevalence, (B) prediction uncertainty and (C) number of infected individuals.
Population-adjusted predicted prevalence (%) and number of individuals (×10 ) infected with soil-transmitted helminths, stratified by province
| Anhui | 54.9 | 4.3 (2.9; 6.8) | 2.4 (1.6; 3.8) | 1.4 (0.77; 2.6) | 0.78 (0.42; 1.4) | 4.6 (2.6; 8.1) | 2.5 (1.5; 4.4) | 10.1 (7.6; 14.2) | 5.5 (4.2; 7.8) |
| Beijing | 17.0 | 0.68 (0.40; 1.3) | 0.12 (0.07; 0.22) | 0.05 (0.02; 0.23) | 0.01 (0.00; 0.04) | 0.02 (0.01; 0.06) | 0.00# (0.00; 0.01) | 0.77 (0.47; 1.4) | 0.13 (0.08; 0.24) |
| Chongqing | 26.7 | 10.2 (7.9; 12.4) | 2.7 (2.1; 3.3) | 1.2 (0.78; 1.7) | 0.31 (0.21; 0.47) | 10.3 (7.6; 13.5) | 2.8 (2.0; 3.6) | 20.6 (17.1; 24.0) | 5.5 (4.6; 6.4) |
| Fujian | 32.8 | 1.9 (1.5; 2.7) | 0.63 (0.48; 0.89) | 2.0 (1.4; 3.2) | 0.67 (0.44; 1.0) | 8.6 (6.4; 11.6) | 2.8 (2.1; 3.8) | 12.3 (10.1; 15.3) | 4.0 (3.3; 5.0) |
| Gansu | 25.6 | 6.6 (3.8; 11.5) | 1.7 (0.97; 2.9) | 0.30 (0.10; 1.3) | 0.08 (0.02; 0.34) | 0.02 (0.00; 0.16) | 0.00# (0.00; 0.04) | 7.0 (4.1; 11.9) | 1.8 (1.0; 3.0) |
| Guangdong | 91.1 | 3.0 (2.1; 4.4) | 2.7 (1.9; 4.0) | 2.3 (1.4; 3.5) | 2.1 (1.3; 3.2) | 4.3 (2.6; 7.1) | 3.9 (2.4; 6.5) | 9.0 (7.1; 12.4) | 8.2 (6.4; 11.3) |
| Guangxi | 37.6 | 6.9 (5.1; 9.4) | 2.6 (1.9; 3.5) | 3.6 (2.3; 5.7) | 1.4 (0.86; 2.1) | 7.8 (5.4; 11.8) | 2.9 (2.0; 4.4) | 17.4 (14.0; 21.8) | 6.5 (5.3; 8.2) |
| Guizhou | 31.4 | 27.9* (19.5; 37.6) | 8.7 (6.1; 11.8) | 5.2 (2.8; 9.6) | 1.6 (0.87; 3.0) | 4.1 (2.1; 7.7) | 1.3 (0.65; 2.4) | 34.6 (25.9; 43.3) | 10.9 (8.1; 13.6) |
| Hainan | 6.7 | 7.5 (5.0; 10.5) | 0.50 (0.33; 0.70) | 18.3* (11.9; 25.9) | 1.2 (0.80; 1.7) | 22.1* (16.0; 29.7) | 1.5 (1.1; 2.0) | 40.8* (33.6; 48.6) | 2.7 (2.2; 3.3) |
| Hebei | 75.5 | 1.3 (0.77; 2.1) | 0.95 (0.58; 1.6) | 0.09 (0.04; 0.20) | 0.07 (0.03; 0.15) | 0.12 (0.06; 0.31) | 0.09 (0.04; 0.23) | 1.5 (0.97; 2.4) | 1.1 (0.73; 1.8) |
| Heilongjiang | 42.3 | 2.1 (0.99; 4.7) | 0.90 (0.42; 2.0) | 0.02 (0.01; 0.07) | 0.01 (0.00; 0.03) | 0.04 (0.01; 0.26) | 0.02 (0.00; 0.11) | 2.2 (1.1; 4.8) | 0.93 (0.44; 2.0) |
| Henan | 84.3 | 2.2 (1.5; 3.2) | 1.8 (1.2; 2.7) | 0.62 (0.34; 1.2) | 0.52 (0.29; 1.1) | 1.5 (0.83; 2.7) | 1.2 (0.70; 2.3) | 4.3 (3.2; 5.9) | 3.6 (2.7; 4.9) |
| Hubei | 58.2 | 18.3 (14.4; 22.7) | 10.6 (8.4; 13.2) | 3.2 (1.7; 6.7) | 1.9 (0.98; 3.9) | 5.9 (4.0; 8.9) | 3.4 (2.3; 5.2) | 24.9 (20.7; 30.1) | 14.5 (12.0; 17.5) |
| Hunan | 55.1 | 17.7 (12.5; 24.9) | 9.7 (6.9; 13.7) | 1.8 (0.9; 3.6) | 0.99 (0.50; 2.0) | 3.5 (2.0; 6.6) | 1.9 (1.1; 3.7) | 22.1 (16.6; 29.5) | 12.2 (9.2; 16.3) |
| Jiangsu | 74.3 | 1.2 (0.88; 1.8) | 0.91 (0.65; 1.3) | 0.72 (0.45; 1.5) | 0.54 (0.34; 1.1) | 2.2 (1.5; 3.5) | 1.6 (1.1; 2.6) | 4.1 (3.2; 5.7) | 3.1 (2.4; 4.3) |
| Jiangxi | 36.3 | 11.3 (8.1; 15.7) | 4.1 (2.9; 5.7) | 3.3 (2.0; 5.8) | 1.2 (0.73; 2.1) | 5.0 (3.1; 7.7) | 1.8 (1.1; 2.8) | 18.6 (14.8; 23.6) | 6.8 (5.4; 8.6) |
| Jilin | 29.2 | 7.2 (4.3; 11.8) | 2.1 (1.2; 3.5) | 0.02 (0.00; 0.09) | 0.01 (0.00; 0.03) | 0.04 (0.01; 0.28) | 0.01 (0.00; 0.08) | 7.3 (4.3; 11.9) | 2.1 (1.3; 3.5) |
| Liaoning | 43.1 | 3.5 (1.4; 9.1) | 1.5 (0.61; 3.9) | 0.02 (0.00; 0.08) | 0.01 (0.00; 0.03) | 0.03 (0.00; 0.21) | 0.01 (0.00; 0.09) | 3.5 (1.5; 9.2) | 1.5 (0.64; 5.0) |
| Nei Mongol | 29.7 | 2.2 (1.0; 5.2) | 0.65 (0.30; 1.6) | 0.01# (0.01; 0.06) | 0.00# (0.00; 0.02) | 0.01 (0.00; 0.04) | 0.00# (0.00; 0.01) | 2.2 (1.0; 5.2) | 0.66 (0.31; 1.6) |
| Ningxia Hui | 6.3 | 3.8 (2.5; 5.4) | 0.24 (0.16; 0.34) | 0.07 (0.03; 0.26) | 0.00# (0.00; 0.02) | 0.00# (0.00; 0.03) | 0.00# (0.00; 0.00) | 3.9 (2.6; 5.5) | 0.25 (0.16; 0.34) |
| Qinghai | 5.0 | 5.7 (3.4; 9.5) | 0.28 (0.17; 0.47) | 0.05 (0.01; 0.20) | 0.00# (0.00; 0.01) | 0.00# (0.00; 0.03) | 0.00# (0.00; 0.00) | 5.8 (3.5; 9.6) | 0.29 (0.17; 0.48) |
| Shaanxi | 34.2 | 5.8 (2.6; 12.5) | 2.0 (0.89; 4.3) | 0.84 (0.30; 2.3) | 0.29 (0.10; 0.78) | 0.39 (0.09; 1.9) | 0.14 (0.03; 0.66) | 7.0 (3.7; 13.4) | 2.4 (1.3; 4.6) |
| Shandong | 93.4 | 5.2 (3.7; 7.3) | 4.9 (3.4; 6.9) | 2.1 (1.4; 3.3) | 2.0 (1.3; 3.1) | 0.78 (0.44; 1.6) | 0.73 (0.41; 1.5) | 7.9 (6.2; 10.4) | 7.4 (5.8; 9.7) |
| Shanghai | 15.0 | 0.32# (0.21; 0.54) | 0.05# (0.03; 0.08) | 0.46 (0.27; 0.81) | 0.07 (0.04; 0.12) | 0.02 (0.01; 0.05) | 0.00# (0.00; 0.01) | 0.82 (0.58; 1.2) | 0.12 (0.09; 0.18) |
| Shanxi | 35.5 | 1.7 (0.88; 3.9) | 0.59 (0.31; 1.4) | 0.14 (0.04; 0.41) | 0.05 (0.01; 0.15) | 0.07 (0.02; 0.27) | 0.02 (0.01; 0.10) | 1.9 (1.1; 4.1) | 0.68 (0.37; 1.4) |
| Sichuan | 94.6 | 14.8 (11.5; 19.3) | 14.0* (10.9; 18.2) | 3.9 (2.4; 6.9) | 3.7* (2.2; 6.5) | 15.1 (10.9; 21.4) | 14.3* (10.3; 20.3) | 30.6 (26.0; 36.2) | 29.0* (24.6; 34.2) |
| Tianjin | 9.8 | 0.66 (0.32; 1.3) | 0.06 (0.03; 0.13) | 0.01# (0.00; 0.05) | 0.00# (0.00; 0.00) | 0.03 (0.01; 0.13) | 0.00# (0.00; 0.01) | 0.70# (0.36; 1.3) | 0.07# (0.04; 0.13) |
| Xinjiang Uygur | 25.0 | 2.4 (1.1; 7.1) | 0.60 (0.26; 1.8) | 0.05 (0.02; 0.15) | 0.01 (0.00; 0.04) | 0.01 (0.00; 0.09) | 0.00# (0.00; 0.02) | 2.5 (1.1; 7.2) | 0.62 (0.28; 1.8) |
| Tibet | 2.7 | 3.3 (1.5; 7.7) | 0.09 (0.04; 0.21) | 0.47 (0.15; 1.4) | 0.01 (0.00; 0.04) | 0.03 (0.01; 0.17) | 0.00# (0.00; 0.00) | 3.9 (1.9; 8.1) | 0.10 (0.05; 0.22) |
| Yunnan | 39.5 | 13.6 (9.0; 19.4) | 5.4 (3.5; 7.7) | 3.5 (2.0; 6.5) | 1.4 (0.77; 2.6) | 2.7 (1.6; 5.0) | 1.1 (0.62; 2.0) | 19.0 (13.89; 25.1) | 7.5 (5.5; 9.9) |
| Zhejiang | 45.4 | 0.80 (0.58; 1.2) | 0.36 (0.26; 0.54) | 0.64 (0.38; 1.1) | 0.29 (0.17; 0.50) | 3.0 (1.9; 4.9) | 1.4 (0.88; 2.2) | 4.4 (3.3; 6.4) | 2.0 (1.5; 2.9) |
†Estimates based on Gridded population of 2010; calculations based on the median and 95% BIC of the posterior distribution of the predicted risk from 2005 onwards.
*Highest prevalence/largest number of infected individuals among provinces; #lowest prevalence/smallest number of infected individuals among provinces.