Literature DB >> 24350489

Treatment of domestic wastewater using conventional and baffled septic tanks.

Fayza Aly Nasr1, Basem Mikhaeil1.   

Abstract

The main theme of the study was a comparative study of domestic wastewater treatment using conventional and baffled septic tanks. The septic tanks were fed continuously with domestic wastewater at three different hydraulic retention times (HRTs). The HRTs chosen were 24, 48 and 72 h with corresponding organic loads of 0.321, 0.436 and 0.885 kg chemical oxygen demand (COD) per m3 per day, respectively. The performance of the septic tanks at the three HRTs gave satisfactory results. For the conventional septic tank, COD removal was 53.4%, 56% and 65.3%, at an HRT of 24, 48 and 72 h, respectively, with residual COD of 412, 380 and 334mg/l, respectively. At HRTs of 72, 48 and 24 h, the following percentages removals were realized for: biochemical oxygen demand (BOD), 68.4%, 57, 53.5%; total suspended solid (TSS), 65.3%, 58.3, 55%; phosphorus, 29.3%, 26.9, 25.6%; total Kjeldahl nitrogen 26.8%, 20.8, 17.7%, respectively. On the contrary, ammonia concentrations increased by 7.1%, 5.2 and 4.2% under the same conditions. Consequently, the results showed that the removal of fecal coliform at all HRTs was less than one log. The two baffled septic tanks exhibited superior results at HRTs of 72, 48 and 24 h. Comparing the treated domestic wastewater quality produced by the two types of septic tanks in terms of physico-chemical and biological characteristics, better results were obtained using the two baffles type.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2013        PMID: 24350489     DOI: 10.1080/09593330.2013.767285

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Environ Technol        ISSN: 0959-3330            Impact factor:   3.247


  4 in total

1.  Microbiome taxonomic and functional profiles of two domestic sewage treatment systems.

Authors:  K J Hidalgo; T Saito; R S Silva; Tiago P Delforno; Iolanda C S Duarte; V M de Oliveira; Dagoberto Y Okada
Journal:  Biodegradation       Date:  2020-11-23       Impact factor: 3.909

2.  Review of Dry and Wet Decentralized Sanitation Technologies for Rural Areas: Applicability, Challenges and Opportunities.

Authors:  N Lourenço; L M Nunes
Journal:  Environ Manage       Date:  2020-03-02       Impact factor: 3.266

3.  Public health performance of sanitation technologies in Tamil Nadu, India: Initial perspectives based on E. coli release.

Authors:  Musa Manga; Pete Kolsky; Jan Willem Rosenboom; Sudha Ramalingam; Lavanya Sriramajayam; Jamie Bartram; Jill Stewart
Journal:  Int J Hyg Environ Health       Date:  2022-05-25       Impact factor: 7.401

4.  Appropriate solid waste management system in Quelimane (Mozambique): study and design of a small-scale center for plastic sorting with wastewater treatment.

Authors:  Francesca Villa; Giovanni Vinti; Mentore Vaccari
Journal:  Waste Dispos Sustain Energy       Date:  2022-02-21
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.