| Literature DB >> 24349957 |
Luana Mattos de Oliveira Cruz1, Ronaldo Stefanutti2, Bruno Coraucci Filho1, Adriano Luiz Tonetti3.
Abstract
In rural areas of developing countries, there is a lack of sanitation services and the installation of such infrastructure is hampered by the high investment costs for initial implementation and by the limited availability of qualified personnel. An alternative to traditional sanitation services include an anaerobic filter, but the high cost of appropriate filling material can be an obstacle to its wide-spread implementation. To decrease this construction cost, the objective of this work was to study the use of coconut shells as filling material for anaerobic filters. Anaerobic filters were built and filled with the studied material and operated with up flow and hydraulic retention time of 9 hours. The reactors provided a removal of 79 ± 16% in BOD terms, indicating that the coconut shell filling had efficiency consistent with the literature data. In addition, the husks were found to retain their tensile strength following use in the reactors. Coconut husks have more empty bed volume than other low cost materials, such as crushed stone, nearing properties of traditional materials. The results of this study indicate that coconut husks may prove to be a low cost alternative to traditional fillers for anaerobic treatment in rural communities.Entities:
Keywords: Anaerobic filter; Anaerobic treatment; Coconut; Decentralized sanitation; On site sewage treatment; Sewage
Year: 2013 PMID: 24349957 PMCID: PMC3863397 DOI: 10.1186/2193-1801-2-655
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Springerplus ISSN: 2193-1801
Figure 1Scheme of the up flow anaerobic filter (Tonetti et al. 2012 ).
Figure 2Coconut shells of the species.
Figure 3Average COD of the raw sewage and effluent from anaerobic filters.
Figure 4Average BOD of the raw sewage and effluent from anaerobic filters.
Mean values of the tensile test
| Parameter | Before using in anaerobic filter | After using in anaerobic filter |
|---|---|---|
| Diameter range of ten fibers taken from coconut husks (mm) | 8.2 ± 1.8 | 8.0 ± 1.1 |
| Area (mm2) | 54.2 ± 26.1 | 52.0 ± 15.1 |
| Force (N) | 96.7 ± 5.1 | 95.7 ± 3.0 |
| Tension (MPa) | 2.1 ± 0.7 | 2.0 ± 0.5 |
Different lower case letters in each line indicate significant difference (p < 0.05).
Density, empty bed volume and surface area
| Parameter | Coconut shells | Bamboo rings | Crushed stone | Rasching rings (2 in)* | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Before using in anaerobic filters | After using in anaerobic filters | ||||
| Density (kg.m-3) | 915.9 ± 46.4 | 306.3 ± 66.8 | n.a.** | n.a.** | n.a.** |
| Empty bed volume (%) | 62.5 ± 2.4 | 81.3 ± 2.7 | 75 | 55 | 92 |
| Specific surface area (m2.m-3) | 89.6 ± 13.5 | 100.3 ± 14.8 | 91.8 | 60.1 | 103.0 |
*Henley and Seader (2005). **n.a.: not found in the literature. Different lower case letters in each line indicate significant difference (p < 0.05).