| Literature DB >> 24349956 |
Jonathan D Hughes1, Philip W Fink2, David F Graham3, David S Rowlands4.
Abstract
We previously reported increased running economy and joint range of motion (ROM) during subsequent exercise performed 48-h following strenuous exercise while wearing garments containing micro-titanium particles generated from high-pressure aqueous processing of titanium (AQUA TITAN(TM)). Here we utilised an isolated plantarflexion triceps surae model and AQUA TITAN-treated flexible tape to determine if dermal application of the micro-titanium could account for meaningful changes in functional properties of the musculotendinous unit. In a randomised double-blind crossover, 20 trained men day 1, baseline measures, AQUA TITAN or placebo tape covering the triceps surae, intermittent high-intensity treadmill running; day 2, rest; day 3, post-stress post-treatment outcome measures. Outcomes comprised: plantarflexion ROM via isokinetic dynamometry; short latency reflex from electromyography; Achilles tendon stiffness from isometric dynamometry, ultrasonography (Achilles-medial-gastrocnemius junction), motion analysis, and force-length modelling. High-intensity exercise with placebo tape reduced tendon stiffness (-16.5%; 95% confidence limits ±8.1%; small effect size), relative to non-taped baseline, but this effect was negligible (-5.9%; ±9.2%) with AQUA TITAN (AQUA TITAN-placebo difference -11.3%; ±11.6%). Change in latency relative to baseline was trivial with placebo (1.6%; ±3.8%) but large with AQUA TITAN (-11.3%; ±3.3%). The effects on ROM with AQUA TITAN (1.6%; ±2.0%) and placebo were trivial (-1.6% ±1.9%), but the small difference (3.1%; ±2.7%) possibly greater with AQUA TITAN. AQUA TITAN tape accelerated the reflex response and attenuated reduced Achilles tendon stiffness following fatiguing exercise. Altered neuromuscular control of tendon stiffness via dermal application of micro-titanium treated materials may facilitate restoration of musculotendinous contractile performance following prior strenuous exercise.Entities:
Keywords: Dynamometry; Recovery; Stretch reflex; Tendon compliance; Tendon tap
Year: 2013 PMID: 24349956 PMCID: PMC3863395 DOI: 10.1186/2193-1801-2-653
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Springerplus ISSN: 2193-1801
Figure 1Experimental design. Shown is (A) pre-testing, familiarisation measures, and the two crossover blocks, followed by (B, inset) detail of one of the two 3-d experimental blocks.
Figure 2Experimental set-up to determine the effect of AQUA TITAN tape on triceps surae contractile function. Shown is (a) positioning of the experimental tape covering the entire region of the posterior lower limb (triceps surae), (b) the contrasting marker (motion analysis) and ultrasound probe positioning and LED synchronization marker, and (c) the ultrasound image of medial gastrocnemius (MG)–Achilles junction (MTJ).
Figure 3Example of a typical force-length relationship in the Achilles tendon resulting from a maximal isometric contraction in neutral anatomical position. The figure illustrates the appropriateness of the exponential curve fit aligned to the raw data.
Figure 4Effect of 48-h AQUA TITAN tape application following high-intensity intermittent treadmill running on tendon-tap stretch reflex response time and joint range of motion. Data are (a) short latency reflex; (b) voluntary plantarflexion ROM. Data are raw means. Variability bars are the between-subject SD.
Figure 5Effect of AQUA TITAN tape on overall average Achilles tendon stiffness measured during maximal isometric contraction pre and post high-intensity intermittent treadmill run. Data are the back log-transformed average mean stiffness of all angles measure at maximal force. Variability bars are the between-subject SD.
Statistical summary of the effect of AQUATITAN tape applied during recovery from intermittent high-intensity running on Achilles tendon stiffness, ankle joint range of motion during plantarflexion, and the short latency reflex, relative to the pre-run baseline, and the post-treatment comparisons for peak torque during maximal isokinetic contractions of the Triceps Surae
| Outcome1 | Mean effect; ±95%CL(%)2 | Standardised difference; ±95%CL | P-value | Magnitude-based inference3 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Achilles tendon stiffness | ||||
| Placebo | -16.5; ±8.1 | -0.40; ±0.21 | 32E-5 | Small very likely |
| AQUA TITAN | -5.9; ±9.2 | -0.14; ±0.23 | 0.23 | Trivial possible |
| AQUA TITAN- Placebo | -11.3; ±11.6 | -0.28; ±0.31 | 0.09 | Small possible |
| Plantarflexion range of motion | ||||
| Placebo | -1.6; ±1.9 | -0.12; ±0.15 | 0.12 | Trivial likely |
| AQUA TITAN | 1.6; ±2.0 | 0.12; ±0.15 | 0.11 | Trivial likely |
| AQUA TITAN- Placebo | -3.1; ±2.7 | -0.24; ±0.21 | 0.03 | Small possible |
| Short latency reflex time | ||||
| Placebo | 1.6; ±3.8 | 0.20; ±0.48 | 0.42 | Small possible |
| AQUA TITAN | -11.3; ±3.3 | -1.4; ±0.47 | 8E-9 | Large almost certain |
| AQUA TITAN- Placebo | 14.6; ±6.2 | 1.8; ±0.7 | 26E-7 | Large almost certain |
| Peak torque during maximal isokinetic contraction | ||||
| 30º∙s-1 AQUA TITAN- Placebo | 4.2; ±14.2 | 0.06; ±0.19 | 0.57 | Likely trivial |
| 60º∙s-1 AQUA TITAN- Placebo | 11.1; ±10.9 | 0.12; ±0.12 | 0.03 | Likely trivial |
| 90º∙s-1 AQUA TITAN- Placebo | -7.3; ±8.2 | -0.08; ±0.09 | 0.09 | Very likely trivial |
| 120º∙s-1 AQUA TITAN- Placebo | -6.2; ±13.8 | -0.07; ±0.15 | 0.41 | Likely trivial |
| Overall AQUA TITAN- Placebo | 0.08; ±7.7 | 0.001; ±0.08 | 0.98 | Almost certainly trivial |
1Data are the difference in the post intermittent high-intensity run measure minus the pre run measure. For peak torque during maximal isokinetic contraction, only the post-pre difference in the AQUA TITAN minus Placebo contrasts is shown.
2Add or subtract this value by the mean to obtain the upper and lower confidence limits.
3Magnitude-based inferences about the true value for outcomes were qualified using a modification of the Cohen effect size classification system (trivial = 0.0–0.2, small = 0.2–0.6, moderate = 0.6–1.2, large = 1.2–2.0, very large = 2.0–4.0, and extremely large >4.0). The threshold standardised difference considered substantial is small. The thresholds for assigning qualitative terms to probability of a substantial effect were: <0.5%, almost certainly not; <5%, very unlikely; <25%, unlikely; <75%, possible; >75%, likely; >95%, very likely; >99.5%, almost certain (Hopkins et al. 2009).