Literature DB >> 24349625

Hormonal replacement treatment improves clinical pregnancy in frozen-thawed embryos transfer cycles: a retrospective cohort study.

Yu Zheng1, Zhou Li1, Min Xiong1, Ting Luo1, Xiyuan Dong1, Bo Huang1, Hanwang Zhang1, Jihui Ai1.   

Abstract

This study aimed to assess frozen-thawed embryo transfer (FET) outcomes in natural, hormone replacement treatment (HRT) and semi-HRT cycles. This was a retrospective cohort study of 5414 cycles of patients in an academic hospital. Patients were grouped as 2216 natural cycles, 1180 semi-HRT cycles, and 2018 HRT cycles. Primary outcome measures were implantation rate, clinical pregnancy rate and live birth rate. Other parameters, such as peak endometria-thickness, were also analyzed. Patients undergoing FET with HRT obtained higher implantation rate and clinical pregnancy rate than patients with natural or semi-HR cycles (29.3% vs. 21.5% vs. 25.6%, P=0.01, and 48.7% vs. 42.7% vs. 36.1%, P=0.01, respectively). This finding was not changed in patients with thin endometrium (≤8 mm). A Subanalysis in patients with HRT showed that the implantation and clinical pregnancy rate was higher in patients without ovulation than ovulatory patients (29.8% vs. 16.9%, P<0.01, and 49.5% vs. 26.3%, P<0.01, respectively). This study suggests that HRT increases the possibility of pregnancy. Further, our data showed that ovulation in HRT cycle has a detrimental effect on pregnancy. Therefore, we recommend that HRT should be used in FET cycles, and ovulation of patients should be evaluated during the treatment.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Frozen-thawed embryo transfer; clinical pregnancy rate; hormone replacement treatment; implantation rate; natural cycle

Year:  2013        PMID: 24349625      PMCID: PMC3853428     

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Transl Res        ISSN: 1943-8141            Impact factor:   4.060


  24 in total

1.  Estrogen is a critical determinant that specifies the duration of the window of uterine receptivity for implantation.

Authors:  Wen-ge Ma; Haengseok Song; Sanjoy K Das; Bibhash C Paria; Sudhansu K Dey
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2003-02-24       Impact factor: 11.205

2.  Cryopreservation of embryos and pregnancy rates after IVF.

Authors:  B A Lieberman; S A Troup; P L Matson
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  1992-07-11       Impact factor: 79.321

3.  Transfer of cryopreserved-thawed pre-embryos in a cycle using exogenous steroids without prior gonadotrophin-releasing hormone agonist suppression yields favourable pregnancy results.

Authors:  J T Queenan; J W Ramey; H J Seltman; L Eure; L L Veeck; S J Muasher
Journal:  Hum Reprod       Date:  1997-06       Impact factor: 6.918

4.  Assisted reproductive technology in Europe, 2006: results generated from European registers by ESHRE.

Authors:  J de Mouzon; V Goossens; S Bhattacharya; J A Castilla; A P Ferraretti; V Korsak; M Kupka; K G Nygren; A Nyboe Andersen
Journal:  Hum Reprod       Date:  2010-06-22       Impact factor: 6.918

Review 5.  Update on the role of leukemia inhibitory factor in assisted reproduction.

Authors:  Lusine Aghajanova
Journal:  Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2010-06       Impact factor: 1.927

6.  Cryopreserved-thawed embryo transfer in natural or down-regulated hormonally controlled cycles: a retrospective study.

Authors:  Tarek A Gelbaya; Luciano G Nardo; Helen R Hunter; Cheryl T Fitzgerald; Greg Horne; Elizabeth E H Pease; Daniel R Brison; Brian A Lieberman
Journal:  Fertil Steril       Date:  2006-03       Impact factor: 7.329

7.  Blastocyst culture and transfer: analysis of results and parameters affecting outcome in two in vitro fertilization programs.

Authors:  W B Schoolcraft; D K Gardner; M Lane; T Schlenker; F Hamilton; D R Meldrum
Journal:  Fertil Steril       Date:  1999-10       Impact factor: 7.329

8.  Replacement of frozen-thawed embryos in artificial and natural cycles: a prospective semi-randomized study.

Authors:  M Sathanandan; M C Macnamee; P Rainsbury; K Wick; P Brinsden; R G Edwards
Journal:  Hum Reprod       Date:  1991-05       Impact factor: 6.918

Review 9.  Mouse models of implantation.

Authors:  Kevin Y Lee; Jae-Wook Jeong; Sophia Y Tsai; John P Lydon; Francesco J DeMayo
Journal:  Trends Endocrinol Metab       Date:  2007-06-27       Impact factor: 12.015

10.  Transfer of cryopreserved-thawed pre-embryos in a natural cycle or a programmed cycle with exogenous hormonal replacement yields similar pregnancy results.

Authors:  J T Queenan; L L Veeck; H J Seltman; S J Muasher
Journal:  Fertil Steril       Date:  1994-09       Impact factor: 7.329

View more
  11 in total

1.  Impact of method of endometrial preparation for frozen blastocyst transfer on pregnancy outcome: a retrospective cohort study.

Authors:  Snigdha Alur-Gupta; Margaret Hopeman; Dara S Berger; Clarisa Gracia; Kurt T Barnhart; Christos Coutifaris; Suneeta Senapati
Journal:  Fertil Steril       Date:  2018-09       Impact factor: 7.329

2.  Increased incidence of post-term delivery and Cesarean section after frozen-thawed embryo transfer during a hormone replacement cycle.

Authors:  Kazuki Saito; Kenji Miyado; Kenji Yamatoya; Akira Kuwahara; Eisuke Inoue; Mami Miyado; Maki Fukami; Tomonori Ishikawa; Takakazu Saito; Toshiro Kubota; Hidekazu Saito
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2017-01-20       Impact factor: 3.412

3.  Replacing single frozen-thawed euploid embryos in a natural cycle in ovulatory women may increase live birth rates compared to medicated cycles in anovulatory women.

Authors:  Alexis P Melnick; Robert Setton; Logan D Stone; Nigel Pereira; Kangpu Xu; Zev Rosenwaks; Steven D Spandorfer
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2017-06-24       Impact factor: 3.412

4.  Frozen blastocyst embryo transfer using a supplemented natural cycle protocol has a similar live birth rate compared to a programmed cycle protocol.

Authors:  Ruth B Lathi; Yueh-Yun Chi; Jing Liu; Briana Saravanabavanandhan; Aparna Hegde; Valerie L Baker
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2015-05-28       Impact factor: 3.412

5.  Analysis of endometrial thickness patterns and pregnancy outcomes considering 12,991 fresh IVF cycles.

Authors:  ShuJie Liao; Renjie Wang; Cheng Hu; Wulin Pan; Wei Pan; Dongyang Yu; Lei Jin
Journal:  BMC Med Inform Decis Mak       Date:  2021-06-03       Impact factor: 2.796

6.  Natural cycle versus artificial cycle in frozen-thawed embryo transfer: A randomized prospective trial.

Authors:  Marzieh Agha-Hosseini; Leila Hashemi; Ashraf Aleyasin; Marzieh Ghasemi; Fatemeh Sarvi; Maryam Shabani Nashtaei; Mahshad Khodarahmian
Journal:  Turk J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2018-03-29

7.  Comparison of recombinant and urinary follicle-stimulating hormones over 2000 gonadotropin-releasing hormone antagonist cycles: a retrospective study.

Authors:  Wei Pan; Haiting Tu; Lei Jin; Cheng Hu; Jianwu Xiong; Wulin Pan; Dongyang Yu; Renjie Wang; Yuehan Li; Weiming Huang; ShuJie Liao
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2019-03-29       Impact factor: 4.379

8.  The effect of fresh IVF cycle characteristics on frozen embryo transfer (FET) outcomes.

Authors:  Nayla J Bushaqer; Noor N Alkhudhairy; Ziyad M Alturaigi; Rowaida M Alhamad; Wadha A Mohawesh; Fatema E Alraka; Hisham A Ayyoub; M Dayou Nawal
Journal:  JBRA Assist Reprod       Date:  2020-05-01

9.  Hormone Replacement Versus Natural Cycle Protocols of Endometrial Preparation for Frozen Embryo Transfer.

Authors:  Ye Pan; Bo Li; Ze Wang; Ying Wang; Xiaoshu Gong; Wenqing Zhou; Yuhua Shi
Journal:  Front Endocrinol (Lausanne)       Date:  2020-09-30       Impact factor: 5.555

10.  A comparison of pregnancy rate between natural cycle and hormone replacement cycle in patients who underwent frozen embryo transfer using 2 consecutive hormone replacement regiments: A STROBE-compliant retrospective study.

Authors:  Conghui Pang; Lin Guo; Yanyan Bi; Kehua Wang; Fang Lian; Zhijuan Wu; Xiaoyan Xu; Zhengao Sun
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2020-09-11       Impact factor: 1.817

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.