Véronique Michel1, Guanjun Shen2, Chuan-Chou Shen3, Chung-Che Wu3, Chrystèle Vérati4, Sylvain Gallet4, Marie-Hélène Moncel5, Jean Combier6, Samir Khatib7, Michel Manetti8. 1. Université Nice Sophia Antipolis, Campus Saint-Jean-d'Angély, SJA3 - CEPAM- UMR 7264 CNRS, Nice Cedex 4, France ; Géoazur, UMR7329, UNS-CNRS-IRD-OCA, Valbonne, France. 2. College of Geographical Sciences, Nanjing Normal University, Nanjing, China. 3. High-precision Mass Spectrometry and Environment Change Laboratory (HISPEC), Department of Geoscience, National Taiwan University N°1, Taipei, Taiwan ROC. 4. Géoazur, UMR7329, UNS-CNRS-IRD-OCA, Valbonne, France. 5. Département de Préhistoire, UMR 7194, MNHN, IPH, Paris, France. 6. CNRS, Macon, France. 7. Laboratoire Départemental de Préhistoire du Lazaret, Nice, France. 8. Université Nice Sophia Antipolis, Département Terre-Environnement-Espace, Parc Valrose, Nice Cedex 2, France.
Abstract
Refined radio-isotopic dating techniques have been applied to Orgnac 3, a Late Acheulean and Early Middle Palaeolithic site in France. Evidence of Levallois core technology appeared in level 4b in the middle of the sequence, became predominant in the upper horizons, and was best represented in uppermost level 1, making the site one of the oldest examples of Levallois technology. In our dating study, fourteen speleothem samples from levels 7, 6 and 5b, were U/Th-dated. Four pure calcite samples from the speleothem PL1 (levels 5b, 6) yield ages between 265 ± 4 (PL1-3) and 312 ± 15 (PL1-6) thousand years ago (ka). Three samples from the top of a second stalagmite, PL2, yield dates ranging from 288 ± 10 ka (PL2-1) to 298 ± 17 ka (PL2-3). Three samples from the base of PL2 (level 7) yield much younger U/Th dates between 267 and 283 ka. These dates show that the speleothems PL1 and PL2 are contemporaneous and formed during marine isotope stage (MIS) 9 and MIS 8. Volcanic minerals in level 2, the upper sequence, were dated by the (40)Ar/(39)Ar method, giving a weighted mean of 302.9 ± 2.5 ka (2σ) and an inverse isochron age of 302.9 ± 5.9 ka (2σ). Both (40)Ar/(39)Ar dating of volcanic sanidines and U/Th dating of relatively pure and dense cave calcites are known to be well established. The first parallel application of the two geochronometers to Orgnac 3 yields generally consistent results, which point to the reliability of the two methods. The difference between their age results is discussed.
Refined radio-isotopic dating techniques have been applied to Orgnac 3, a Late Acheulean and Early Middle Palaeolithic site in France. Evidence of Levallois core technology appeared in level 4b in the middle of the sequence, became predominant in the upper horizons, and was best represented in uppermost level 1, making the site one of the oldest examples of Levallois technology. In our dating study, fourteen speleothem samples from levels 7, 6 and 5b, were U/Th-dated. Four pure calcite samples from the speleothem PL1 (levels 5b, 6) yield ages between 265 ± 4 (PL1-3) and 312 ± 15 (PL1-6) thousand years ago (ka). Three samples from the top of a second stalagmite, PL2, yield dates ranging from 288 ± 10 ka (PL2-1) to 298 ± 17 ka (PL2-3). Three samples from the base of PL2 (level 7) yield much younger U/Th dates between 267 and 283 ka. These dates show that the speleothems PL1 and PL2 are contemporaneous and formed during marine isotope stage (MIS) 9 and MIS 8. Volcanic minerals in level 2, the upper sequence, were dated by the (40)Ar/(39)Ar method, giving a weighted mean of 302.9 ± 2.5 ka (2σ) and an inverse isochron age of 302.9 ± 5.9 ka (2σ). Both (40)Ar/(39)Ar dating of volcanicsanidines and U/Th dating of relatively pure and dense cave calcites are known to be well established. The first parallel application of the two geochronometers to Orgnac 3 yields generally consistent results, which point to the reliability of the two methods. The difference between their age results is discussed.
The Orgnac 3 site is located at a place called Mattecarlinque, at an altitude of 320 m, on the southwest fringe of an Urgonian karstic plateau (lower Cretaceous), in southern Ardèche, central France [1-4] (Figure ). The site was initially a cave with human settlement, later changed into a rock shelter, and finally became an open-air site [5] (Figure ). The depositional sequence is 11m thick. The lower archaeological levels (8 to 4a) were deposited in a cave context while the upper levels 2-1 were accumulated in an open-air environment. Seven hominin teeth, in levels 6, 5b and 5a, assigned to Homo heidelbergensis [6], about 50,000 stone artefacts and abundant mammal fossils have been discovered [1]. Bone assemblages indicate the predominance of carnivores in lower levels (8 and 7), cervids in levels 6-5a, bovids in levels 4b-3 and equids in upper levels 2 and 1. According to biostratigraphical correlation, the lower levels (8 to 3) are attributed to the Middle Pleistocene (MIS 9) and the upper levels 2 and 1 to the late Middle Pleistocene (MIS 8). Levallois debitage, marking the beginning of the Middle Palaeolithic, appears in the middle strata and becomes predominant at the top of the sequence, producing changes in tool kits, raw material procurement and subsistence strategies [1,5]. A reliable chronology for this site is thus particularly important for understanding human cultural evolution and the onset of Neandertal culture. The aim of this study is to refine the age intervals using high-precision U/Th dating on intercalated speleothems and the 40Ar/39Ar method on well-preserved volcanic minerals in the upper strata. Note that both of these methods are considered as reliable for establishing a temporal frame for human evolution.
Figure 1
Localization of Orgnac 3 in France and an overview of the site.
Stratigraphy, biostratigraphy and lithic industry
The depositional sequence can be divided into four major stratigraphic units (I, II, III, IV) and 12 sedimentary levels (Ia to Ie, IIa and IIb, IIIa to IIIc, IVa and IVb) [7], with 10 archaeological (1, 2, 3, 4a, 4b, 5a, 5b, 6, 7 and 8) and 3 hominin fossil-bearing (6, 5b, 5a) levels [2,5,8] (see table in [9]).The lowermost unit I includes five levels (Ia - Ie) composed of bedded-sandy-clay with angular gravels [7,9]. This unit, containing mainly carnivore and reindeer remains (archaeological levels 8, 7), including small sized Canis lupus, Crocuta crocuta spelaea, Ursus thibetanus, Vulpes vulpes, Panthera (Leo) spelaea, Ursus deningeri, Ursus arctos, appears to have been deposited under a generally cold climate [1,4] (Figure ). Unit II, divided into three archaeological levels (6, 5b and 5a) with a preponderance of Cervus elaphus, Dama clactoniana, Capreolus sussenbornensis and Sus scrofa fossils, is composed of silty deposits with eroded gravels, large fallen blocks and speleothem formations [7], corresponding to a humid and temperate climate (MIS9, [1]) (Figure ). Further up, unit III is composed of three sedimentary levels (IIIa to IIIc) of clayey sand with angular gravels and blocks, with abundant Bovidae fossils, corresponding to a cool and humid climate. Three archaeological horizons (4b, 4a, 3) can be identified (Figure ). The uppermost unit IV, including two archaeological levels (1 and 2), is composed of clayey deposits with some gravels [7]. This unit marks the last human occupation of the site, and contains predominantly Equus steinheimensis remains, corresponding to a cooler climate and an open landscape [1] (Figure ).
Figure 2
Archaeological levels, stratigraphic levels of Orgnac 3, dominant faunal composition, paleoclimate and biostratigraphy.
Evidence of the emergence of Middle Palaeolithic-type behavior can be observed throughout the depositional sequence with the development of long and complex flaking reduction sequences. In the lower levels (7 to 5a), debitage is mainly represented by centripetal cores. In the middle levels (4b and 4a), the first evidence of Levallois cores can be observed. In the top levels (3 to 1), Levallois cores on flakes are dominant. Two groups of levels may be distinguished by observing the flake-tool kit; levels 8-3 (with a broader diversity of flake-tools) and levels 2-1 (containing a majority of scrapers with thinner retouch). The shaping reduction sequences are limited throughout the whole sequence (bifaces and pebble tools). In levels 2 and 1, the frequency of bifaces is very low (less than 1%), and these are mainly bifacial tools with few removals. Various criteria related to technical behavior and subsistence strategy patterns indicate gradual changes over time towards Middle Palaeolithic-type behavior from the bottom to the top of the sequence.
Previous chronological studies
The first dating of Orgnac 3 was carried out in 1985 [10]. Four speleothem samples from archaeological levels 7 and 6, and between levels 6 and 5b were dated with the alpha spectrometric U/Th method (Figure ). Based on the results obtained, the author proposed that the mean age of four age results ka, should be taken as the best age estimate for the speleothem formations. One of the four calcite samples was also analyzed by the electron spin resonance (ESR) method, yielding an age of 309 ± 34 ka [11]. At about the same time, Debard and Pastre [8] described and analyzed fallout volcanic ashes in the upper archaeological level 2, which is composed of lightly brown silty sand [7]. The volcanic ashes there are yellowish inclusions several tens of centimeters in diameter (an example of such an inclusion is given in Figure , marked as ORG-C1). The authors [8] extracted well- preserved angular green pyroxenes, which are characteristic of one of the last eruptions of the Puy de Sancy volcano (Mont-Dore, Massif Central, France) [12]. They proposed an age of about 300 ka for the upper level 2. With the fission track (FT) technique, Khatib [7] analyzed 22 zircons from volcanic ashes from the same level, obtaining an age of 298 ± 55 ka (Figure ). Masaoudi [13] presented the results of U/Th and ESR dating of bones and teeth and ESR dating of calcite and quartz samples from different levels (Figure ). The measured dates are overdispersed, and do not conform well to the stratigraphy. Recently 40,Ar/39Ar dating was carried out on 16 sets of sanidine grains [9]. Four of them yield ages too old to be acceptable because of contamination by inherited K feldspar grains, while the remaining 12 ages are between 276 and 326 ka with a weighted mean of 308.2 ± 6.8 ka. Roger et al. [14] considered that the tephra layers at the Praclaux and du Bouchet maars (French Massif Central) and at Orgnac 3 all came from the eruption of the Sancy volcano centre. Based on the weighted mean of 40Ar/39Ar dates on a series of sanidines from the Praclaux and Bouchet lakes, they assigned an age of 275 ± 5 ka to the Sancy eruption. Recently, Nomade et al. [12] recalculated the age according to ACR-2 at 1.193 Ma and obtained an age of 279 ± 5 ka. Roger et al. [14] also determined a step-heating plateau age of 300 ± 2 ka from sanidine grain populations (Figure ). For their experiments, the neutron fluence (J) was monitored with a biotite Bern B4B with an age of 17.25 Ma and a sanidine Draz with an age of 24.99 Ma [14], recently recalibrated to 25.42 Ma [15].
Figure 3
Summary of previously obtained ages and ages obtained in this work.
Figure 4
Position of level 2 and of levels 7 and 6 at Orgnac 3.
(A) of volcanic inclusion ORG-C1 in the upper unit level 2 and (B) of calcite samples number PL2-1 to PL2-5 (levels 7 and 6).
Position of level 2 and of levels 7 and 6 at Orgnac 3.
(A) of volcanic inclusion ORG-C1 in the upper unit level 2 and (B) of calcite samples number PL2-1 to PL2-5 (levels 7 and 6).
Results
U/Th dating
Isotopic measurements of the fourteen speleothem samples are presented in Table and in Figures ,
. The uranium content ranges from 66 ppb to 148 ppb, and thorium from 250 to 32,495 ppt. Samples are mostly free from detrital contamination as indicated by 230Th/232Th activity ratios higher than 20. Only three samples PL1-1, PL1-2 and PL1-2a have low [230Th/232Th] activity ratios (10.0, 10.9 and 17.6 respectively) indicating contamination by detrital materials (Table , Figure ). Note that PL1-2 and PL1-2a are taken from exactly the same position. But compared with PL1-2a (with a [230Th/232Th] activity ratio of 17.6), the more contaminated PL1-2 (10.9) gives a significantly younger age result (218 ka << 275 ka, Table ). For this, we tend to consider that the samples with a low [230Th/232Th] activity ratio may have undergone metamorphism leading to underestimated age results. Therefore these three (ICP-MS) U/Th ages were excluded (Table , Figure ). The precision of ICP-MS isotopic ratio measurements is much better in comparison with the previous alpha measurements, as shown in Figure . For the base of the upper part of the first speleothem PL1, U/Th dates range from 265 ± 4 ka (PL1-3) and 295 ± 8 ka (PL1-4a) (levels 5b-6) (Figure . The top of the lower part of this speleothem yielded a date of 312 ± 15 ka (PL1-6) (Figure ). For the second stalagmite PL2 (Figure ), U/Th dates range from 281 ± 8 ka (PL2-4a) to 298 ± 17 ka (PL2-3), except for the date of 267 ± 6 ka for sample PL2-4. This youngest date is significantly different from the date, 281 ± 8 ka, of the coeval sample PL2-4a and the mean date of 289 ± 16 ka for the other 5 dates of this speleothem. This abnormally young date is probably biased by post-depositional diagenesis and is thus excluded from this study. U/Th ages indicate that both speleothems from levels 7-6-5b range from 265 ka (marine isotope stage 8, MIS 8) to 312 ka (MIS 9).
Table 1
Uranium and thorium isotopic compositions and U/Th ages of Orgnac 3 samples by ICP-MS, Thermo Electron Neptune and Element II at NTU.
Sample
Levels
238U
232Th
δ234U
[234U/238U]
[230Th/238U]
[230Th/232Th]
Age (ka)
Age (ka)
δ 234Uinitial
N°
(ppb) a
(ppt)
measured a
Activity
activity c
activity d
uncorrected
corrected c,e
correctedb
PL1-1 *
5b, 6
111.80
± 0.12
31,003
± 193
13.9
± 1.4
1.0139
± 0.0014
0.906
± 0.010
9.99
± 0.13
241.030
± 10.194
n.d.
PL1-2 *
5b, 6
131.86
± 0.17
32,495
± 186
15.0
± 1.7
1.0150
± 0.0017
0.881
± 0.010
10.93
± 0.14
218.171
± 8.051
n.d.
PL1-2a *
5b, 6
118.19
± 0.11
19,260
± 80
12.9
± 1.2
1.0129
± 0.0012
0.9356
± 0.0073
17.56
± 0.15
275.609
± 9.928
n.d.
PL1-3 *
5b, 6
65.967
± 0.066
866.3
± 3.6
9.4
± 1.3
1.0094
± 0.0013
0.9236
± 0.0031
214.9
± 1.1
265.701
± 4.224
265.360
± 4.225
19.8
± 2.7
PL1-4 *
5b, 6
68.555
± 0.073
761.9
± 3.3
10.2
± 1.3
1.0102
± 0.0013
0.9357
± 0.0030
257.3
± 1.3
280.218
± 4.657
279.930
± 4.653
22.4
± 2.9
PL1-4a *
5b, 6
77.193
± 0.078
3448
± 8.2
10.3
± 1.3
1.0103
± 0.0013
0.9465
± 0.0047
64.76
± 0.35
296.260
± 8.054
295.099
± 8.053
23.7
± 3.0
PL1-5 **
5b, 6
67.12
± 0.15
249.6
± 2.3
19.0
± 4.5
1.0190
± 0.0045
0.9411
± 0.0078
773.7
± 9.4
273.354
± 12.165
273.260
± 12.154
41.2
± 9.9
PL1-6 **
5b, 6
81.14
± 0.19
3038.8
± 9.4
12.6
± 3.7
1.0126
± 0.0037
0.9588
± 0.0065
78.24
± 0.55
312.521
± 14.863
311.556
± 14.734
30.4
± 9.1
PL2-1 *
6, 7
104.94
± 0.12
7239
± 26
4.8
± 1.6
1.0048
± 0.0016
0.9358
± 0.0060
41.64
± 0.30
290.039
± 9.786
288.218
± 9.795
10.7
± 3.6
PL2-2 *
6, 7
109.88
± 0.18
4985
± 21
4.5
± 2.0
1.0045
± 0.0020
0.9403
± 0.0066
63.36
± 0.51
297.817
± 11.744
296.623
± 11.676
10.3
± 4.6
PL2-3 *
6, 7
123.98
± 0.31
8365
± 31
4.4
± 6.2
1.0044
± 0.0062
0.9417
± 0.0064
42.65
± 0.31
300.149
± 16.959
298.368
± 16.759
10
± 14
PL2-4 *
6, 7
125.70
± 0.16
5360
± 14
11.3
± 1.3
1.0113
± 0.0013
0.9283
± 0.0044
66.54
± 0.35
268.755
± 5.839
267.648
± 5.885
24.0
± 2.9
PL2-4a *
6, 7
147.96
± 0.16
7667
± 24
12.9
± 1.2
1.0129
± 0.0012
0.9404
± 0.0052
55.46
± 0.34
282.307
± 7.564
280.965
± 7.592
28.4
± 2.7
PL2-5 *
6, 7
137.96
± 0.18
15,698
± 87
15.6
± 1.5
1.1056
± 0.0015
0.9460
± 0.0090
25.41
± 0.28
285.678
± 13.303
282.729
± 13.289
34.5
± 3.5
ICP-MS model:* MC-ICP-MS [16]; ** SF-ICP-MS [17]. Analytical errors are 2σ of the mean. [238U] = [235U] x 137.818 (±0.65‰) [18]; δ234U = ([234U/238U]activity - 1) x 1000. δ 234Uinitial corrected was calculated based on 230Th age (T), i.e., δ 234Uinitial = δ234Umeasured
X eλ234*T, and T is corrected age. [230Th/238U]activity = 1 - e-λ230T + (δ234Umeasured/1000)[λ230/(λ230 - λ234)](1 - e-(λ230 - λ234) T), where T is the age. Decay constants are 9.1705 x 10-6 yr
1 for 230Th, 2.8221 x 10-6 yr
1 for 234U [19], and 1.55125 x 10-10 yr
1 for 238U [20]. The degree of detrital 230Th contamination is indicated by the [230Th/232Th] activity ratio. Age corrections for samples were calculated using an estimated activity 230Th/232Th ratio of 0.74 (± 100%). Those are the values for a material at secular equilibrium, with the crustal 232Th/238U value of 3.8 with 100% uncertainty. n.d. = not determined: these samples are excluded because they have [230Th/232Th] activity ratio < 20.
Figure 5
Position of speleothem samples number PL1-1 to PL1-6 (levels 6 and 5b).
Figure 6
U/Th diagram obtained from Isoplot program [21] with quotation of previous alpha spectrometer data at 2σ level.
ICP-MS model:* MC-ICP-MS [16]; ** SF-ICP-MS [17]. Analytical errors are 2σ of the mean. [238U] = [235U] x 137.818 (±0.65‰) [18]; δ234U = ([234U/238U]activity - 1) x 1000. δ 234Uinitial corrected was calculated based on 230Th age (T), i.e., δ 234Uinitial = δ234Umeasured
X eλ234*T, and T is corrected age. [230Th/238U]activity = 1 - e-λ230T + (δ234Umeasured/1000)[λ230/(λ230 - λ234)](1 - e-(λ230 - λ234) T), where T is the age. Decay constants are 9.1705 x 10-6 yr
1 for 230Th, 2.8221 x 10-6 yr
1 for 234U [19], and 1.55125 x 10-10 yr
1 for 238U [20]. The degree of detrital 230Th contamination is indicated by the [230Th/232Th] activity ratio. Age corrections for samples were calculated using an estimated activity 230Th/232Th ratio of 0.74 (± 100%). Those are the values for a material at secular equilibrium, with the crustal 232Th/238U value of 3.8 with 100% uncertainty. n.d. = not determined: these samples are excluded because they have [230Th/232Th] activity ratio < 20.
40Ar/39Ar dating
Fifty-seven sanidine grain populations were analyzed with the total-fusion method (Figure ). In order to obtain precise data, 50-150 sanidine grains were analyzed for each measurement 40Ar/39Ar ages with counting errors at 2σ are shown in Tables ,
,
. Ten samples with determined ages older than 550 ka are most likely contaminated by inherited K feldspar grains. These samples, representing 17.5% of the results, were not taken into account (Tables ,
,
). The abnormally old age results may be explained by the presence of old minerals, such as plagioclases or sanidines, extracted from the base rock during the Sancy volcano eruption.
Figure 7
Sanidine minerals at Orgnac 3.
(A) About 150 grains (200-300 μm) for a total fusion analysis. (B) Orgnac sanidine (SEM). The minerals are sharp-edged and unweathered.
Table 2
Analytical 40Ar/39Ar data summary of samples from Orgnac 3 (level 2) (Lab. # K346-2 to K346-25) (see footnotes in Table 4).
Sample
Lab N°
40Ar (moles)
40Ar (V)
± 1σ
39Ar (V)
± 1σ
38Ar (V)
± 1σ
37Ar (V)
± 1σ
36Ar (V)
± 1σ
40Ar*/ 39Ark
± 1σ
%40Ar*
Age (ka)
± 2σ
Blank
B346-1
0.002313
0.000035
0.000015
0.000007
0.000005
0.000004
0.000027
0.000010
0.000020
0.000008
Sanidine
K346-2
2.115E-15
0.108072
0.000216
0.141057
0.000136
0.001791
0.000006
0.000588
0.000008
0.000071
0.000004
0.632142
0.02091
84.5
284.5
± 18.8
Sanidine
K346-3
2.173E-15
0.110942
0.000229
0.140594
0.000286
0.001775
0.000014
0.000544
0.000013
0.000075
0.000003
0.647114
0.02040
83.9
291.3
± 18.4
Blank
B346-2
0.002252
0.000018
0.000087
0.000011
0.000024
0.000004
0.000100
0.000008
0.000020
0.000002
Sanidine
K346-4
2.945E-15
0.149503
0.000302
0.194349
0.000535
0.002434
0.000018
0.000841
0.000008
0.000075
0.000005
0.662450
0.01189
87.6
298.2
± 10.7
Sanidine
K346-5
1.494E-15
0.076928
0.000127
0.096335
0.000231
0.001209
0.000003
0.000396
0.000010
0.000057
0.000004
0.650727
0.01581
84.0
292.9
± 14.2
Blank
B346-3
0.002355
0.000032
0.000025
0.000006
0.000015
0.000003
0.000080
0.000006
0.000024
0.000005
Sanidine
K346-6
2.292E-15
0.116975
0.000269
0.138666
0.000386
0.001734
0.000017
0.000610
0.000011
0.000093
0.000006
0.675911
0.01892
81.5
304.2
± 17.0
Sanidine
K346-7
2.895E-15
0.147108
0.000353
0.187460
0.000480
0.002333
0.000018
0.000801
0.000014
0.000088
0.000006
0.665610
0.01500
85.9
299.6
± 13.5
Sanidine
K346-8
2.747E-15
0.139715
0.000270
0.173531
0.000453
0.002168
0.000020
0.000715
0.000014
0.000078
0.000011
0.695159
0.02180
87.5
312.9
± 19.6
Blank
B346-4
0.002738
0.000036
0.000118
0.000012
0.000015
0.000005
0.000083
0.000006
0.000032
0.000006
Sanidine
K346-9
1.877E-15
0.096595
0.000231
0.122468
0.000704
0.001550
0.000012
0.000532
0.000011
0.000055
0.000004
0.705738
0.01904
91.7
317.6
± 17.1
Sanidine
K346-10
7.795E-15
0.392509
0.000757
0.146539
0.000310
0.001824
0.000014
0.000561
0.000016
0.000067
0.000007
2.592475
0.03262
97.0
* 1166.5
± 29.3
Sanidine
K346-11
1.779E-15
0.091699
0.000254
0.113530
0.000501
0.001420
0.000011
0.000498
0.000009
0.000042
0.000011
0.752419
0.03250
95.6
338.6
± 29.3
Blank
B346-5
0.002653
0.000042
0.000066
0.000009
0.000034
0.000006
0.000073
0.000007
0.000023
0.000005
Sanidine
K346-13
5.045E-15
0.254926
0.000566
0.122390
0.000286
0.001519
0.000019
0.000513
0.000013
0.000038
0.000004
2.025957
0.02596
97.9
* 911.7
± 23.4
Sanidine
K346-14
2.521E-15
0.128700
0.000210
0.167022
0.000624
0.002135
0.000023
0.000689
0.000009
0.000076
0.000005
0.656814
0.01464
86.7
295.6
± 13.2
Blank
B346-6
0.002735
0.000057
0.000121
0.000015
0.000004
0.000004
0.000083
0.000007
0.000023
0.000006
Sanidine
K346-15
1.808E-15
0.093128
0.000139
0.117389
0.000291
0.001483
0.000011
0.000506
0.000009
0.000060
0.000005
0.672288
0.02119
86.9
302.6
± 19.1
Sanidine
K346-16
4.945E-15
0.249972
0.000430
0.150912
0.000306
0.001929
0.000023
0.000669
0.000010
0.000083
0.000005
1.520405
0.02179
92.4
* 684.2
± 19.6
Blank
B346-7
0.002167
0.000037
0.000007
0.000005
0.000006
0.000007
0.000002
0.000013
0.000008
0.000007
Sanidine
K346-17
2.823E-15
0.143316
0.000319
0.188726
0.001019
0.002437
0.000030
0.000718
0.000020
0.000054
0.000006
0.675740
0.01605
89.6
304.1
± 14.4
Sanidine
K346-18
2.977E-15
0.150993
0.000352
0.185636
0.000486
0.002305
0.000023
0.000689
0.000006
0.000125
0.000007
0.617218
0.01747
76.3
277.8
± 15.7
Sanidine
K346-19
2.081E-15
0.106218
0.000369
0.137491
0.000368
0.001733
0.000016
0.000489
0.000010
0.000055
0.000005
0.656114
0.01964
85.9
295.3
± 17.7
Blank
B348-8
0.002223
0.000070
0.000085
0.000006
0.000006
0.000002
0.000019
0.000010
0.000028
0.000004
Sanidine
K346-20
9.422E-16
0.049331
0.000268
0.059375
0.000406
0.000737
0.000015
0.000219
0.000016
0.000033
0.000006
0.764799
0.03956
95.4
344.2
± 35.6
Sanidine
K346-21
1.448E-15
0.074611
0.000405
0.098834
0.000584
0.001271
0.000019
0.000381
0.000014
0.000019
0.000006
0.756301
0.02333
100.0
340.4
± 21.0
Sanidine
K346-22
1.307E-15
0.067582
0.000219
0.081598
0.000374
0.001018
0.000022
0.000365
0.000027
0.000049
0.000008
0.723949
0.03254
89.5
325.8
± 29.3
Blank
B348-9
0.002367
0.000045
0.000103
0.000014
0.000001
0.000005
0.000008
0.000008
0.000022
0.000005
Sanidine
K346-23
1.748E-15
0.089756
0.000521
0.121182
0.000521
0.001544
0.000012
0.000503
0.000026
0.000044
0.000004
0.666709
0.01799
91.6
300.1
± 16.2
Sanidine
K346-24
3.376E-15
0.171187
0.000866
0.222005
0.001938
0.002736
0.000041
0.000851
0.000034
0.000064
0.000014
0.704840
0.02199
91.8
317.2
± 19.8
Sanidine
K346-25
2.165E-15
0.110596
0.000539
0.147713
0.001002
0.001817
0.000018
0.000551
0.000019
0.000057
0.000008
0.662120
0.02052
89.5
298.0
± 18.5
Table 3
Analytical 40Ar/39Ar data summary of samples from Orgnac 3 (level 2) (Lab. # K346-26 to K346-46) (see footnotes in Table 4).
Sample
Lab N°
40Ar (moles)
40Ar (V)
± 1σ
39Ar (V)
± 1σ
38Ar (V)
± 1σ
37Ar (V)
± 1σ
36Ar (V)
± 1σ
40Ar*/ 39Ark
± 1σ
%40Ar*
Age (ka)
± 2σ
Blank
B346-10
0.002361
0.000047
0.000028
0.000029
0.000011
0.000009
0.000067
0.000009
0.000024
0.000003
Sanidine
K346-26
3.198E-15
0.162277
0.000387
0.214743
0.000511
0.002706
0.000024
0.000806
0.000026
0.000068
0.000005
0.680414
0.01141
90.9
306.2
± 10.3
Sanidine
K346-27
2.179E-15
0.111330
0.000756
0.137578
0.001254
0.001714
0.000014
0.000539
0.000025
0.000066
0.000003
0.698425
0.01474
87.7
314.3
± 13.3
Sanidine
K346-28
2.470E-15
0.125845
0.000414
0.161947
0.000626
0.002039
0.000017
0.000579
0.000003
0.000065
0.000006
0.684112
0.01430
89.3
307.9
± 12.9
Blank
B346-11
0.002483
0.000049
0.000113
0.000018
0.000016
0.000001
0.000050
0.000005
0.000033
0.000004
Sanidine
K346-29
2.707E-15
0.137846
0.000338
0.178340
0.000334
0.002251
0.000010
0.000671
0.000011
0.000073
0.000005
0.688158
0.01327
90.2
309.7
± 11.9
Sanidine
K346-30
3.475E-15
0.176218
0.000635
0.113913
0.000442
0.001428
0.000017
0.000434
0.000012
0.000062
0.000007
1.448867
0.02793
94.5
* 652.0
± 25.1
Sanidine
K346-31
1.663E-15
0.085623
0.000132
0.113371
0.000335
0.001434
0.000012
0.000417
0.000009
0.000046
0.000003
0.694006
0.01579
94.1
312.4
± 14.2
Blank
B346-12
0.002367
0.000028
0.000074
0.000009
0.000006
0.000006
0.000099
0.000007
0.000026
0.000004
Sanidine
K346-32
1.387E-15
0.071727
0.000131
0.090758
0.000218
0.001152
0.000012
0.000376
0.000006
0.000059
0.000007
0.653553
0.02616
85.0
294.2
± 23.5
Sanidine
K346-33
2.194E-15
0.112063
0.000576
0.149094
0.000488
0.001838
0.000012
0.000526
0.000021
0.000050
0.000003
0.684570
0.01209
92.6
308.1
± 10.9
Sanidine
K346-34
9.348E-15
0.469763
0.000905
0.152557
0.000362
0.001854
0.000017
0.000527
0.000019
0.000016
0.000008
3.091944
0.03611
100.0
* 1391.2
± 32.5
Sanidine
K346-35
1.760E-15
0.090375
0.000178
0.112439
0.000315
0.001427
0.000011
0.000437
0.000011
0.000074
0.000008
0.653960
0.02400
83.1
294.3
± 21.6
Blank
B351-1
0.002154
0.000027
0.000041
0.000012
0.000016
0.000005
0.000093
0.000006
0.000034
0.000004
Sanidine
K346-36
3.477E-15
0.175985
0.000298
0.200637
0.000339
0.002552
0.000016
0.000628
0.000010
0.000115
0.000004
0.741072
0.01250
85.3
333.5
± 11.3
Blank
B352-2
0.001857
0.000025
0.000017
0.000009
0.000006
0.000003
0.000042
0.000009
0.000017
0.000005
Sanidine
K346-37
3.217E-14
1.610252
0.001652
0.255068
0.000265
0.003020
0.000028
0.000619
0.000019
0.000073
0.000011
6.429203
0.06657
100.0
* 2891.6
± 59.8
Blank
B352-4
0.002173
0.000034
0.000056
0.000009
0.000003
0.000001
0.000059
0.000016
0.000024
0.000007
Sanidine
K346-38
3.771E-15
0.190742
0.000559
0.238406
0.000913
0.003049
0.000020
0.000840
0.000020
0.000138
0.000011
0.645660
0.01841
81.3
290.6
± 16.6
Sanidine
K346-39
2.099E-15
0.107113
0.000214
0.138810
0.000293
0.001706
0.000016
0.000526
0.000013
0.000060
0.000006
0.673945
0.02059
88.7
303.3
± 18.5
Sanidine
K346-40
4.508E-15
0.227598
0.000490
0.280507
0.000910
0.003477
0.000026
0.000927
0.000006
0.000136
0.000011
0.680678
0.01578
84.3
306.4
± 14.2
Blank
B352-5
0.002127
0.000044
0.000013
0.000007
0.000005
0.000003
0.000026
0.000010
0.000017
0.000004
Sanidine
K346-41
6.205E-15
0.312391
0.000748
0.163983
0.000531
0.002034
0.000022
0.000587
0.000012
0.000043
0.000007
1.847349
0.02435
97.1
* 831.3
± 21.9
Sanidine
K346-42
3.830E-15
0.193622
0.000438
0.243991
0.000709
0.003072
0.000025
0.000766
0.000009
0.000143
0.000003
0.628780
0.01091
79.7
283.0
± 9.8
Sanidine
K346-43
6.402E-15
0.322223
0.000847
0.246832
0.000603
0.003049
0.000029
0.000808
0.000022
0.000074
0.000007
1.227794
0.01672
94.1
* 552.6
± 15.0
Sanidine
K346-44
9.969E-15
0.500560
0.001361
0.288374
0.000738
0.003560
0.000024
0.000855
0.000006
0.000047
0.000007
1.698798
0.01990
97.7
* 764.5
± 17.9
Blank
B352-6
0.002406
0.000082
0.000190
0.000013
0.000014
0.000003
0.000080
0.000007
0.000020
0.000003
Sanidine
K346-45
2.750E-15
0.139888
0.000310
0.182741
0.000483
0.002297
0.000010
0.000599
0.000020
0.000065
0.000008
0.677190
0.01613
89.4
304.8
± 14.5
Sanidine
K346-46
4.457E-15
0.225240
0.000492
0.292985
0.000816
0.003653
0.000026
0.000967
0.000018
0.000110
0.000008
0.667034
0.01170
87.2
300.2
± 10.5
Table 4
Analytical 40Ar/39Ar data summary of samples from Orgnac 3 (level 2) (Lab. # K346-47 to K346-59).
Sample
Lab N°
40Ar (moles)
40Ar (V)
± 1σ
39Ar (V)
± 1σ
38Ar (V)
± 1σ
37Ar (V)
± 1σ
36Ar (V)
± 1σ
40Ar*/ 39Ark
± 1σ
%40Ar*
Age (ka)
± 2σ
Blank
B352-7
0.002193
0.000045
0.000109
0.000014
0.000008
0.000004
0.000047
0.000005
0.000018
0.000006
Sanidine
K346-47
4.373E-15
0.220828
0.000595
0.290423
0.000865
0.003608
0.000028
0.000928
0.000005
0.000097
0.000006
0.669352
0.01130
88.4
301.3
± 10.2
Sanidine
K346-48
4.525E-15
0.228425
0.000507
0.289917
0.000966
0.003643
0.000019
0.000951
0.000014
0.000112
0.000007
0.682064
0.01231
86.9
307.0
± 11.1
Sanidine
K346-49
6.081E-15
0.306248
0.000477
0.392298
0.000710
0.004864
0.000028
0.001224
0.000015
0.000127
0.000013
0.690350
0.01339
88.5
310.7
± 12.1
Blank
B352-8
0.002708
0.000090
0.000321
0.000044
0.000009
0.000005
0.000048
0.000008
0.000030
0.000004
Sanidine
K346-50
1.151E-14
0.578434
0.002794
0.234564
0.000506
0.002873
0.000043
0.000724
0.000012
0.000028
0.000012
2.465336
0.03239
99.7
* 1109.3
± 29.1
Sanidine
K346-51
7.706E-15
0.388023
0.000485
0.434919
0.000896
0.005444
0.000038
0.001339
0.000013
0.000226
0.000007
0.750915
0.01092
84.2
338.0
± 9.8
Blank
B352-9
0.001994
0.000024
0.000010
0.000002
0.000007
0.000002
0.000044
0.000010
0.000023
0.000003
Sanidine
K346-52
3.339E-15
0.168946
0.000396
0.218876
0.000589
0.002741
0.000025
0.000659
0.000013
0.000065
0.000009
0.703869
0.01471
91.5
316.8
± 13.2
Sanidine
K346-53
5.034E-15
0.253687
0.000565
0.330173
0.000809
0.004142
0.000029
0.000999
0.000012
0.000122
0.000008
0.672855
0.01101
87.5
302.8
± 9.9
Sanidine
K346-54
4.783E-15
0.241125
0.000506
0.314938
0.000699
0.003949
0.000028
0.000874
0.000013
0.000122
0.000006
0.665573
0.01000
86.9
299.6
± 9.0
Blank
B346-10
0.002195
0.000032
0.000190
0.000025
0.000022
0.000004
0.000052
0.000009
0.000016
0.000006
Sanidine
K346-55
2.157E-15
0.110050
0.000317
0.145868
0.000478
0.001833
0.000017
0.000465
0.000016
0.000053
0.000008
0.664665
0.02223
89.0
299.2
± 20.0
Sanidine
K346-56
3.659E-15
0.185140
0.000488
0.233405
0.000886
0.002934
0.000018
0.000694
0.000014
0.000135
0.000008
0.634325
0.01605
80.2
285.5
± 14.4
Sanidine
K346-57
3.618E-15
0.183086
0.000384
0.234072
0.000553
0.002915
0.000026
0.000678
0.000016
0.000113
0.000008
0.650638
0.01518
83.4
292.8
± 13.7
Blank
B352-11
0.002521
0.000022
0.000103
0.000012
0.000008
0.000004
0.000053
0.000004
0.000030
0.000002
Sanidine
K346-58
2.756E-15
0.140314
0.000411
0.177705
0.000617
0.002234
0.000022
0.000543
0.000013
0.000098
0.000007
0.662433
0.01411
84.7
298.1
± 12.7
Sanidine
K346-59
2.124E-15
0.108721
0.000217
0.139853
0.000317
0.001745
0.000018
0.000438
0.000011
0.000064
0.000008
0.687444
0.01959
89.7
309.4
± 17.6
* 10 analyses are excluded because these samples are presumed to be contaminated by older feldspar. Each analysis is the total laser fusion of about 50-150 sanidine grains of 200-300 μmn (~ 1.3 mg). Samples were irradiated for 40 min, with Cd shielding in 5C position at McMaster Nuclear Reactor. Heating = 120s. J factor is 0.0002495 ± 0.0000012 for the Alder Creek sanidine (1.194 ± 0.004 Ma, [22]), used as flux monitor. The spectrometer sensitivity is average 2.0 E-14 moles/V. Data are presented following [23] recommendations and calculations are determined by using the ArArCALC-software [24]. Mass discrimination, monitored by analyses of air pipette volume was 0.9979 per aum for lab # k346-2 to k346-5, 1.0037 for lab # k346-6 to k346-16, 1.0088 for lab # k346-17 to k346-25, 1.0047 for lab # k346-26 to k346-35, 1.0026 for lab # k346-36, 1.0044 for lab # k346-37 to k346-40, 1.0056 for lab # k346-41 to k346-51, 1.0082 for lab # k346-52 to k346-59. The (Ar/36Ar) atmospheric argon ratio used is 298.56 ± 0.31 [30]. Interfering isotope production ratios: (Ar/39Ar)k=0.0085 ± 0.0002 ; (Ar/39Ar)k=0.0120 ± 0.0002 ; (Ar/37Ar)Ca = 0.00073± 0.00003 ; (Ar/37Ar)Ca=0.006 ± 0.005 ; (Ar/37Ar)Ca=0.000282 ± 0.000003 36;Cl/38Cl = 316 ± 3.
Sanidine minerals at Orgnac 3.
(A) About 150 grains (200-300 μm) for a total fusion analysis. (B) Orgnac sanidine (SEM). The minerals are sharp-edged and unweathered.* 10 analyses are excluded because these samples are presumed to be contaminated by older feldspar. Each analysis is the total laser fusion of about 50-150 sanidine grains of 200-300 μmn (~ 1.3 mg). Samples were irradiated for 40 min, with Cd shielding in 5C position at McMaster Nuclear Reactor. Heating = 120s. J factor is 0.0002495 ± 0.0000012 for the Alder Creek sanidine (1.194 ± 0.004 Ma, [22]), used as flux monitor. The spectrometer sensitivity is average 2.0 E-14 moles/V. Data are presented following [23] recommendations and calculations are determined by using the ArArCALC-software [24]. Mass discrimination, monitored by analyses of air pipette volume was 0.9979 per aum for lab # k346-2 to k346-5, 1.0037 for lab # k346-6 to k346-16, 1.0088 for lab # k346-17 to k346-25, 1.0047 for lab # k346-26 to k346-35, 1.0026 for lab # k346-36, 1.0044 for lab # k346-37 to k346-40, 1.0056 for lab # k346-41 to k346-51, 1.0082 for lab # k346-52 to k346-59. The (Ar/36Ar) atmospheric argon ratio used is 298.56 ± 0.31 [30]. Interfering isotope production ratios: (Ar/39Ar)k=0.0085 ± 0.0002 ; (Ar/39Ar)k=0.0120 ± 0.0002 ; (Ar/37Ar)Ca = 0.00073± 0.00003 ; (Ar/37Ar)Ca=0.006 ± 0.005 ; (Ar/37Ar)Ca=0.000282 ± 0.000003 36;Cl/38Cl = 316 ± 3.Note that if 10 out of 57 samples are heavily contaminated, unless only one “inherited K feldspar” grain is enough to cause an abnormally old result, we should consider the possibility that the rest may be more or less contaminated.Forty-six dates, ranging from 283 to 344 ka, are associated with low atmospheric contamination (featuring over 79.7% of radiogenic argon, % 40Ar*). Another sample, K346-18 suffers from high atmospheric contamination (> 23.7% i.e. % 40Ar*<76.3, Tables ,
,
), yielding a young age (277.8 ka). Forty of the 47 dates yield an age distribution displayed by a probability density distribution (using Isoplot software, Figure ). The dominant mode of the distribution is centered at 302.9 ± 2.9 ka (2σ, n=40/47, MSDW=1.2, P=0.16) (Figure ). This age distribution is better than previous results [9]. In consequence, the weighted mean age of level 2 at Orgnac 3 is 302.9 ± 2.9 ka, corresponding to the transition from MIS 9 to MIS 8.
Figure 8
40Ar/39Ar ages distribution of Orgnac samples.
The 40Ar/39Ar Orgnac ages are quoted at 2σ level with an age distribution (n=40/47) reported by a probability density distribution using Isoplot [21] (7 open circles are rejected). The weighted mean of 302.9 ± 2.5 ka (2σ, n=40/47, MSDW=1.2, P=0.16).
40Ar/39Ar ages distribution of Orgnac samples.
The 40Ar/39Ar Orgnac ages are quoted at 2σ level with an age distribution (n=40/47) reported by a probability density distribution using Isoplot [21] (7 open circles are rejected). The weighted mean of 302.9 ± 2.5 ka (2σ, n=40/47, MSDW=1.2, P=0.16).The measurement of 36Ar in 40Ar/39Ar dating allows for the plotting of the inverse isochron graph. The results are a series of data points ranging from pure atmospheric argon to pure radiogenic argon. A regression line through these data points forms an inverse isochron and the point at which the isochron intercepts with the x-axis yields the 39Ar/40Ar* of the samples and therefore the age. In Figure , a regression line was plotted using 36Ar/40Ar and 39Ar/40Ar ratios (n=43/57), excluding 14 samples. Ten contaminated samples, K346-20 and K346-11 with high 39Ar/36Ar ratios, K346-21 with a negative 36Ar/40Ar ratio and K346-51 were eliminated in order to attain the atmospheric ratio (298.56; [25]) (Figure ). In these conditions, the atmospheric ratio obtained (40Ar/36Ar)0 is 299.0 ± 41.8 (2σ) and the intercept inverse isochron age is 302.9 ± 5.9 ka (2σ) (MSWD=2.57). This is in agreement with the weighted mean of 302.9 ± 2.9 ka (2σ) (Figure ).
Figure 9
36Ar/40Ar vs 39Ar/40Ar inverse isochron diagram
for all the data (n=57) with ellipse error at 2σ excluding 14 samples (blue squares): 1) *samples too old (quoted with * in Table 2) (n=10); 2) K346-20, K346-11 with a too high 39Ar/36Ar ratio and K346-21 with a negative 36Ar/40Ar ratio because 36Ar was underestimated; 3) K346-51 was eliminated otherwise the MSWD is 3.2 and the atmospheric ratio is not reached.
36Ar/40Ar vs 39Ar/40Ar inverse isochron diagram
for all the data (n=57) with ellipse error at 2σ excluding 14 samples (blue squares): 1) *samples too old (quoted with * in Table 2) (n=10); 2) K346-20, K346-11 with a too high 39Ar/36Ar ratio and K346-21 with a negative 36Ar/40Ar ratio because 36Ar was underestimated; 3) K346-51 was eliminated otherwise the MSWD is 3.2 and the atmospheric ratio is not reached.
Discussion
U/Th and 40Ar/39Ar dating comparison
The 40Ar/39Ar weighted mean age of 302.9 ± 2.9 ka and the inverse isochron age of 302.9 ± 5.9 ka are older than the upper limit of the measured U/Th age interval 265 to 312 ka (Figure ). The 40Ar/39Ar apparent ages determined in the higher level 2, should be younger than the U/Th apparent ages obtained in the median levels. This small difference in age (about 30 ka, which is not a major difference but is nonetheless statistically significant), could be explained by a slight contamination of sanidine grains or by a minor excess of 40Ar. Another hypothesis which may explain the age difference between the two methods may be that the volcanic minerals were transported to the site tens of thousand years after the Sancy eruption. In order to improve our 40Ar/39Ar dating results, we have tentatively used the step-heating method to highlight a possible 40Ar excess. In spite of the presence of excess 40Ar incorporated in minerals during crystallization [26], Renne et al. [27] have demonstrated in other studies with this method that a sanidine sample less than 2000 years old can be dated with 5% precision. However, for Orgnac 3, this step-heating method, using a VG 3600 mass spectrometer with a Daly detector, required a significant amount of material (up to 1,000 grains, 200 μm) which considerably increased the proportion of inherited K feldspar grains and thus increased the probability of an unreliable apparent age.
Figure 10
Stratigraphic positions of speleothem samples and volcanic minerals at Orgnac 3 with corresponding U/Th and 40Ar/39Ar dates.
In conclusion, taking into account our total fusion multigrain analyses, U/Th dates and errors, it seems reasonable to conclude that the Orgnac infilling is contemporaneous with MIS 9 and 8 (Figure ). The U-series date of 265 ka may mark a minimum age for the level 5b, when the Levallois flaking technique began to appear at the site (Figures ,
and
). This date is concordant with the biostratigraphical pattern which attributes levels 2 and 1 to MIS8 [1].
Figure 11
MIS and Orgnac infilling after U/Th and 40Ar/39Ar dating.
Stacked δ18O record of benthic foraminifera from [28] after [29] with modifications. The shaded vertical envelope (± 2σ) shows the occurrence of the Orgnac infilling after U/Th and 40Ar/39Ar dating, close to the transition between MIS 8 and MIS 9.
MIS and Orgnac infilling after U/Th and 40Ar/39Ar dating.
Stacked δ18O record of benthic foraminifera from [28] after [29] with modifications. The shaded vertical envelope (± 2σ) shows the occurrence of the Orgnac infilling after U/Th and 40Ar/39Ar dating, close to the transition between MIS 8 and MIS 9.Thus, according to our U/Th ages, preliminary 40Ar/39Ar and the comparison between the two dating methods, Orgnac 3 is one of the oldest sites with the systematic use of Levallois knapping. As evidenced in [5,1], this temporal framework indicates the emergence of new technological behavior in southern France and Europe during MIS 8. Standardized core technology such as Levallois knapping can be observed in a few well-dated European sites close to the limit between MIS 9 and MIS 8, such as La Micoque (L2/3) (France), Gran Dolina (TD11/10), Bolomor (Spain) and la Baume Bonne (France) attributed to MIS 8 [1].
Conclusion
For the first time, U/Th and 40Ar/39Ar dating methods have been applied together with greater precision than in previous studies for dating a Middle Pleistocene site. The 40Ar/39Ar dating gives a weighted mean age of 302.9 ± 2.9 ka (2σ) for upper level 2 of the Orgnac infilling while the U/Th method yields an age range of 265-312 ka for middle levels 7-6-5b. The age results from the two dating methods are generally consistent, which underlines their reliability. On the other hand, the difference between them is statistically significant taking into account the stratigraphical location of the samples. There are two possible explanations for an older 40Ar/39Ar age of 302.9 ± 2.9 ka (2σ). The first is that the volcanic minerals were transported to the site tens of thousand years after the Sancy eruption. The other possibility is that the analyzed sanidine grain populations have been systematically contaminated by inherited K feldspar grains. To check for the second hypothesis, it is necessary to carry out 40Ar/39Ar dating on single grains. We will soon carry out such research in order to add to the results reported in this paper. For this reason, here we only emphasize the U-series age of 265 ± 4 ka for level 5b, which attributes a minimal timeframe to the appearance of Levallois flaking at the site. Moreover, all our new U/Th ages suggest that the Orgnac 3 site lies within the 320-260 ka time range for the deposit of levels 7, 6 and 5b, supporting the claim that the Early Middle Palaeolithic emerged in Europe about 300,000 years ago.
Materials and Methods
At Orgnac 3, two speleothems of well-crystallized calcite were collected from levels 7, 6 and 5b (Figure ). The first speleothem, in levels 6 and 5b, is composed of two pieces of flowstones, each about 10 cm thick (Figure ). The samples PL1-1 and PL1-2, PL1-2a were taken from the upper part and PL1-3, PL1-4, PL1-4a and PL1-5 from the lower part of the upper piece. One sample PL1-6 was taken from the upper part of the lower piece (Figure ). Six more samples, PL2-1, PL2-2, PL2-3, PL2-4, PL2-4a and PL2-5 were taken from the top, the middle and the bottom, respectively, of a 46 cm-long stalagmite from levels 7 and 6 (Figure ).The selected bulk subsamples were physically cleaned with ultrasonic methods [30]. U/Th chemistry was conducted in a class-10,000 metal-free clean room with class-100 benches at the High-precision Mass Spectrometry and Environment Change Laboratory (HISPEC), Department of Geosciences, National Taiwan University [30,31]. U-Th isotopic compositions and concentrations were determined on a sector-field inductively coupled plasma mass spectrometer (SF-ICP-MS), Thermo Fisher ELEMENT II [17] or a multi-collector ICP-MS (MC-ICPMS), Thermo Fisher NEPTUNE, with a dry introduction system, Cetac ARIDUS [16]. Uncertainties in all ICP-MS U/Th isotopic data were calculated at 2σ level and include corrections for procedure blanks, multiplier dark noise, abundance sensitivity, mass discrimination, and the occurrence of isotopes of interest in spike solution. Age was off-line calculated [17] with decay constants of 9.1705 × 10-6 yr -1 for 230Th and 2.8221 × 10-6 yr -1 for 234U [19], and 1.55125 × 10-10 yr -1 for 238U [20].Volcanic sediment samples were collected from level 2, about 1m below the top of the depositional sequence (Figure ). As sanidine is a proven chronometer [32], the largest possible and well-preserved sanidine grains (200-300 µm) were extracted using standard heavy liquid methods and then hand picked under a binocular microscope (Figure ). The obtained sanidine grains are angular and quite well preserved. Their chemical composition was estimated using scanning electron microscopy (Figure ) with Energy Dispersive X-ray Spectroscopy (EDS) in order to check the homogeneous presence of potassium (Ecole des Mines, Sophia Antipolis, Valbonne, France). The samples were irradiated for 40 minutes with Cd shielding in 5C position at McMaster University Reactor (Hamilton, Canada) and stored for one month at the Geoazur Laboratory (Nice, France). The sanidine grains were subsequently loaded onto a copper plate by sets of about 50-150 grains per hole for multigrain aliquot analyses (Figure ). Gas was extracted with an infrared continuous laser and purified in stainless and glass extraction line using two Al-Zr getters and a N2 cold trap. System blanks were run for every two or three analyzed samples. The mass spectrometer is a VG 3600 with a Daly detector. Mass discrimination was monitored by regularly analyzing one air pipette volume. The ultimate accuracy of the 40Ar/39Ar method depends on well-dated homogeneous standards [15,23]. J values were calculated using an age of 1.194 Ma [22] for ACS and the total decay constant of [33]. Recent revisions of decay and monitor constants suggest values about 0.6% ([15]; 1.201 Ma for ACS) and 1.0% ([34]; 1.206 Ma for ACS) older than those used here [35]. The implied difference in age is negligible for our samples (about 3 ka), therefore we use the conventional value of 1.194 Ma for ACS for all the ages.
Authors: Chuan-Chou Shen; Hai Cheng; R Lawrence Edwards; S Bradley Moran; Henrietta N Edmonds; John A Hoff; Rebecca B Thomas Journal: Anal Chem Date: 2003-03-01 Impact factor: 6.986
Authors: Martina Demuro; Lee J Arnold; Josep M Parés; Alfredo Pérez-González; Ana I Ortega; Juan L Arsuaga; José M Bermúdez de Castro; Eudald Carbonell Journal: PLoS One Date: 2014-10-22 Impact factor: 3.240