| Literature DB >> 24349201 |
Chong Wu1, Han Yan1, Jingzhi Sun2, Fan Yang1, Chun Song1, Feng Jiang3, Yang Li1, Jie Dong1, Gu-Yan Zheng1, Xiao-Li Tian1, Huiqing Cao1.
Abstract
Coronary artery disease (CAD) is the leading cause of death and disability in the world. Genome-wide association studies have implicated the importance of the genetic contribution of vascular smooth muscle cells (VSMCs) function in CAD susceptibility. The aberrant phenotypic modulation of VSMC is responsible for the pathological vascular intima hyperplasia that is the hallmark for atherosclerotic morphology. NEXN is a muscle-specific F-actin binding protein and is regulated by inflammatory cytokines in VSMCs. Whether NEXN contributes to human vascular disorders is still unknown. In this study, we genotyped 5 SNPs, tagging all of the 17 common SNPs within 54 kilobases (kb) covering NEXN gene and its flanking region, in 1883 patients with CAD and 1973 healthy individuals from Han Chinese, and identified one SNP, rs1780050, which was strongly associated with CAD trait. The Bonferroni corrected P-value was 7.65×10(-5). The odds ratio (95% confidence interval) was 1.23 (1.12-1.36) with statistical power of 0.994. Functional analysis showed that NEXN promotes VSMC to a contractile phenotype in vitro and inhibits balloon-injury induced neointima formation in vivo. Further eQTL analysis demonstrated that the risk allele T of rs1780050 is associated with decreased expression of NEXN, thus contributing to a higher risk of CAD susceptibility in the population. This is, to our knowledge, the first study to identify NEXN as a novel CAD susceptibility gene with both genetic and functional evidence.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2013 PMID: 24349201 PMCID: PMC3859596 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0082135
Source DB: PubMed Journal: PLoS One ISSN: 1932-6203 Impact factor: 3.240
Characteristics of populations in this study.
| Population 1 | Population 2 | Population 3 | |||||||
| case | control | P | case | control | P | case | control | P | |
| (n = 450) | (n = 450) | (n = 656) | (n = 740) | (n = 777) | (n = 783) | ||||
|
| 307(68.2%) | 309(68.7%) | 0.840 | 511(77.9%) | 557(75.3%) | 0.248 | 553(71.1%) | 511(65.2%) | 0.012 |
|
| 55.8±0.4 | 57.2±0.5 | 0.050 | 60.5±0.4 | 62.1±0.4 | 0.009 | 53.6±0.3 | 53.9±0.3 | 0.497 |
|
| 26.3±0.2 | 25.7±0.2 | 0.005 | 25.6±0.1 | 24.9±0.1 | <0.001 | 25.6±0.1 | 24.3±0.1 | <0.001 |
|
| 293(65.1%) | 186(41.3%) | <0.001 | 424(64.6%) | 321(43.4%) | <0.001 | 486(62.5%) | 321(25.9%) | <0.001 |
|
| 172(38.2%) | 139(30.9%) | 0.021 | 218(33.2%) | 120(16.2%) | <0.001 | 192(24.7%) | 51(6.5%) | <0.001 |
|
| 235(52.2%) | 173(38.4%) | <0.001 | 276(42.1%) | 358(48.4%) | 0.018 | 489(62.9%) | 387(49.4%) | <0.001 |
|
| 249(55.3%) | 213(47.3%) | <0.001 | 351(53.5%) | 336(45.4%) | <0.001 | 371(47.7%) | 266(34.0%) | <0.001 |
± SEM (standard error of the mean). P values for age and BMI are calculated using Student's t-test. P values for hypertension, diabetes, hyperlipidemia and smoking are calculated by Chi-square test. BMI: body mass index; HT: hypertension; DM: diabetes mellitus; HLP: hyperlipidemia. The data for age and BMI are presented as mean
Allelic association of 5 SNPs in Population 1 of discovery stage.
| SNP | Position | Allele (major/minor) | MAF (case/control) | HWE P | P | OR (95% CI) |
| rs1166706 | 78131617 | C/T | 0.104/0.137 | 0.574 | 0.036 | 0.72(0.53–0.98) |
| rs1780045 | 78146989 | C/T | 0.097/0.083 | 0.589 | 0.514 | 1.12(0.80–1.58) |
| rs1166698 | 78165034 | A/G | 0.467/0.447 | 0.734 | 0.380 | 1.09(0.90–1.33) |
| rs1780050 | 78173128 | G/T | 0.511/0.459 | 0.169 | 0.016 | 1.27(1.04–1.55) |
| rs17101082 | 78173795 | T/C | 0.107/0.114 | 0.678 | 0.600 | 0.92(0.67–1.26) |
% CI): odds ratio with 95% confidence interval. SNP position was based on NCBI B36 assembly, dbSNP b126. MAF: minor allele frequency; HWE P: P value from Chi-square for Hardy-Weinberg Equilibrium test; P: P value from logistic regression after adjustment for gender, age, BMI, hypertension, diabetes, hyperlipidemia and smoking; OR (95
Allelic association of rs1166706 and rs1780050 with CAD in Population 2 and 3 of replication stage.
| SNP | Population 2 | Population 3 | Three Populations Combined | |||||||||
| MAF (case/control) | HWE P | P | OR (95% CI) | MAF (case/control) | HWE P | P | OR (95% CI) | MAF (case/control) | P/power | OR (95% CI) | bP | |
| rs1166706 | 0.097/0.101 | 0.839 | 0.937 | 0.99(0.76–1.29) | 0.115/0.113 | 0.475 | 0.930 | 0.99(0.77–1.27) | 0.106/0.114 | 0.247/N.D | 0.91(0.79–1.06) | N.D |
| rs1780050 | 0.502/0.449 | 0.405 | 0.008 | 1.24(1.06–1.45) | 0.515/0.469 | 0.132 | 0.034 | 1.18(1.01–1.39) | 0.510/0.459 | 1.53×10–5/0.994 | 1.23(1.12–1.36) | 7.65×10−5 |
% CI): odds ratio with 95% confidence interval; power: statistic power when alpha is set as 0.05; bP: corrected P by Bonferroni method; N.D: not determined. MAF: minor allele frequency; HWE P: P value from Chi-square for Hardy-Weinberg Equilibrium test; P: P value from logistic regression after adjustment for gender, age, BMI, hypertension, diabetes, hyperlipidemia and smoking; OR (95
Genotypic association analysis of rs1166706 and rs1780050 with CAD in three populations combined.
| Model | P | OR(95% CI) | |
| rs1166706 | Dom | 0.424 | 0.94(0.79–1.10) |
| Rec | 0.052 | 0.48(0.23–1.01) | |
| Add | 0.239 | 0.91(0.78–1.06) | |
| rs1780050 | Dom | 1.81×10−5 | 1.40(1.20–1.63) |
| Rec | 0.006 | 1.25(1.07–1.47) | |
| Add | 1.37×10−5 | 1.24(1.12–1.36) |
% CI): odds ratio with 95% confidence interval. Dom: dominant model; Rec: recessive model; Add: additive model; P: P-value from logistic regression, adjusted by gender, age, BMI, hypertension, diabetes, hyperlipidemia and smoking; OR (95
Subgroup analysis of rs1780050 in combined populations.
| Subgroup | Case | Control | P | OR(95% CI) | |
| Gender | |||||
| Male | 1371 | 1377 | 0.003 | 1.18(1.06–1.32) | |
| Female | 512 | 596 | 0.001 | 1.38(1.15–1.65) | |
| Age | |||||
| <55 | 766 | 940 | 0.002 | 1.26(1.09–1.47) | |
| ≥55 | 1117 | 1033 | 0.002 | 1.23(1.08–1.39) | |
| Obesity | |||||
| BMI ≤30 | 1708 | 1853 | 9.93×10−5 | 1.22(1.10–1.34) | |
| BMI >30 | 175 | 120 | 0.015 | 1.56(1.09–2.23) | |
| Hypertension | |||||
| Yes | 1203 | 710 | 0.136 | 1.11(0.97–1.27) | |
| No | 680 | 1263 | 1.49×10−5 | 1.35(1.18–1.55) | |
| Diabetes | |||||
| Yes | 549 | 343 | 2.23×10−5 | 1.53(1.26–1.87) | |
| No | 1334 | 1630 | 0.008 | 1.16(1.04–1.29) | |
| Hyperlipidemia | |||||
| Yes | 938 | 980 | 0.001 | 1.24(1.09–1.41) | |
| No | 945 | 993 | 0.003 | 1.22(1.07–1.38) | |
| Smoking | |||||
| Yes | 971 | 815 | 0.005 | 1.22(1.06–1.40) | |
| No | 912 | 1158 | 0.001 | 1.25(1.09–1.42) | |
% CI): odds ratio with 95% confidence interval. Obesity was defined as BMI >30. BMI: body mass index; P: P-value from logistic regression; OR (95
Figure 1Nexn overexpression promotes the contractile phenotype of VSMCs and inhibits balloon injury-induced neointima formation.
(A) VSMCs infected with Adv-Nexn with GFP reporter gene (green) showed a contractile phenotype with enhanced F-actin bundling (red) compared with Adv-GFP control (×200). Nuclei were stained in blue by DAPI. (B) Expression of contractile markers was induced in VSMCs infected with Adv-Nexn by RT-PCR, 18 s as loading control. (C) VSMCs was infected with Adv-Nexn, expression of Nexn was detected by western-blot (C1), and cell growth was arrested by Nexn with MTT assay. Data presented are mean ± SD from at least 3 independent experiments. *P<0.05 by Student's t-test. (D) Balloon injury was performed in the right common carotid artery with adenovirus containing Ad-GFP or Ad-Nexn infused into the injured arteries. 2 weeks after balloon injury, control uninjured and balloon-injured arteries were isolated, sectioned, stained with H & E (D1), and I/M ratios (intima/media) were calculated (D2). *P<0.05 by Student's t-test (n = 6 rats).
Figure 2Risk allele T of rs1780050 correlates with reduced expression of NEXN.
121 healthy individuals were randomly recruited and genotyped by direct sequencing. The individuals were divided into GG and GT+TT group. The expression level of NEXN was quantified by real-time PCR and presented as normalized Ct, which was inversely correlated with the true amount of NEXN transcripts. The average normalized Ct is compared between GG group and GT+TT group by Student's t-test.