| Literature DB >> 24349151 |
Fantahun Biadglegne1, Weghata Tesfaye2, Ulrich Sack3, Arne C Rodloff4.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: The actual burden and causative agent of tuberculous lymphadenitis (TBLN) cases is not well known due to lack of strong surveillance system and diagnostic facilities in Ethiopia. This study was conducted to determine the prevalence of TBLN, its causative agent and risk factors for acquiring this infection.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2013 PMID: 24349151 PMCID: PMC3857213 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0081918
Source DB: PubMed Journal: PLoS One ISSN: 1932-6203 Impact factor: 3.240
Lymph node regions of TBLN patients (n= 226), by sex, age, residence and clinical feature northern Ethiopia.
| Infected sites | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Variables | Cervical N (%) | Axilla N (%) | Inguinal N (%) | Other N (%) | Total N (%) |
|
| |||||
|
| 71(31.4) | 16(7.1) | 5(2.2) | 4(1.8) | 96(42.5) |
|
| 100(44.3) | 17(7.5) | 10(4.4) | 3(1.3) | 130(57.5) |
|
| |||||
|
| 20(8.9) | 4(1.8) | 1(0.4) | 1(0.4) | 26(11.5) |
|
| 48(21.2) | 10(4.4) | 5(2.2) | 1(0.4) | 64(28.2) |
|
| 62(27.4) | 14(6.2) | 4(1.8) | 0(0) | 80(35.4) |
|
| 21(9.4) | 1(0.4) | 3(1.3) | 2(0.9) | 27(12.0) |
|
| 11(4.9) | 1(0.4) | 0(0) | 2(0.9) | 14(6.2) |
|
| 7(3.2) | 2(0.9) | 1(0.4) | 0(0) | 10(4.4) |
|
| 2(0.9) | 1(0.4) | 1(0.4) | 1(0.4) | 5(2.2) |
|
| |||||
|
| 52(23.0) | 8(3.5) | 4(1.8) | 2(0.9) | 66(29.2) |
|
| 119(52.7) | 24(10.6) | 12(5.3) | 5(2.2) | 160(70.8) |
|
| |||||
|
| 129(57.0) | 26(11.5) | 12(5.3) | 6(2.7) | 173(76.5) |
|
| 41(18.1) | 6(2.7) | 2(0.9) | 1(0.4) | 50(22.1) |
|
| 1(0.4) | 1(0.4) | 1(0.4) | 0(0) | 3(1.3) |
N, number
Detection of M. tuberculosis complex from lymph node aspirates using culture methods and Xpert MTB/RIF assay, northern Ethiopia.
| No. with indicated results by | ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
| |||||||
| Result |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 226(51.7) | 124(28.4) | 96(21.9) | 135(30.9) | 226(51.7) | - | - | - |
|
| 200(45.8) | 310(70.9) | 337(77.1) | 298(68.2) | 200(45.8) | 61(30.5) | 132(66.0) | 7(3.5) |
|
| 11(2.5) | 3(0.6) | 4(0.9) | 4(0.9) | 11(2.5) | - | - | - |
|
| 437 | 437 | 437 | 437 | 437 | 61 | 132 | 7 |
*Significant differences (P< 0.0001): BacT/Alert3D vs. L-J medium, BacT/Alert3D vs. Gottsacker medium , BacT/Alert 3D vs. L-J plus Gottsacker media, L-J medium vs. Gottsacker medium, L-J vs. L-J plus Gottsacker media, Gottsacker medium vs. L-J plus Gottsacker media, a at least one positive, b all negative, c at least one contaminated, B, BacT/AlerT 3D system , L-J, Lowenstein Jensen, G, Gottsacker, Pos, positive, Neg, negative, Inv,invalid, N= number,
Figure 1Dot line graph that shows the number of isolates using different culture media at different periods of time, northern Ethiopia.
Presenting systemic symptoms in 226 patients with tuberculous lymphadenitis.
| Clinical presentation | Observation |
|---|---|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
F, Fever, C, Cough, W, Weight loss, N, Night sweating
Lymph node involvement and identification of M.tb complex species by DNA hybridization technology in FNAs from culture positive (n=226) TBLN patients.
| Infected sites | Total cases (n=437) | Smear positive (n=11) | P value | Culture positive (n=226) | P value∆ |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
| 321 | 10 (90.9) | 0.302 | 171(75.7) | 0.601 |
|
| 64 | 1 (9.1) | 1.000 | 33(14.6) | 0.988 |
|
| 35 | 0(0) | 1.000 | 15(6.6) | 0.631 |
|
| 17 | 0(0) | 1.000 | 7(3.1) | 0.765 |
* Fisher’s exact test,∆ Chi-square test
Risk factors associated with the occurrence of TBLN, northern Ethiopia.
| Incidence of TBLN in the cases who has contact with TB patients | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Variables |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 0.492 | ||||
|
| 49(51) | 47(49) | 1.216(0.717-2.063) | 1.230(0.682 -2.218) | |
|
| 60(46.2) | 70(53.8) | 1.00 | 1.00 | |
|
| 0.032 | ||||
|
| 17(65.4) | 9(34.6) | 2.217(0.944-5.211) | 2.774(1.091-7.050) | |
|
| 92(46) | 108(54) | 1.00 | 1.00 | |
|
| 0.615 | ||||
|
| 30(45.5) | 36(54.5) | 0.854(0.481-1.519) | 0.851(.455-1.593) | |
|
| 79(49.4) | 81(50.6) | 1.00 | 1.00 | |
|
| 0.253 | ||||
|
| 77(45.8) | 91(54.2) | 0.687(0.337-1.253) | 0.685(.359-1.309) | |
|
| 32(55.2) | 26(44.8) | 1.00 | 1.00 | |
|
| 0.528 | ||||
|
| 28(45.2) | 34(54.8) | 0.834(0.464-1.499) | 0.801(0.401-1.598) | |
|
| 81(49.7) | 82(50.3) | 1.00 | 1.00 | |
|
| 0.628 | ||||
|
| 92(48.4) | 98(51.6) | 1.049(0.514-2.142) | 0.804(0.332-1.945) | |
|
| 17(47.2) | 19(52.8) | 1.00 | 1.00 | |
|
| 0.188 | ||||
|
| 98(50.5) | 96(49.5) | 1.494(0.892-4.259) | 1.827(0.745-.479) | |
|
| 11(34.4) | 21(65.6) | 1.00 | 1.00 | |
|
| 0.222 | ||||
|
| 99(50.5) | 97(49.5) | 1.745(0.789-3.860) | 1.807(0.700- 4.669) | |
|
| 11(36.7) | 19(63.3) | 1.00 | 1.00 | |
|
| 0.025 | ||||
|
| 43(59.7) | 29(40.3) | 1.977(1.119-3.492) | 2.017(1.094-3.722) | |
|
| 66(42.9) | 88(57.1) | 1.00 | 1.00 | |
* average= 5 persons/ room in a house