| Literature DB >> 24349104 |
Idris Abd Ghani1, Hamady Dieng2, Zainal Abidin Abu Hassan1, Norazsida Ramli3, Nadia Kermani1, Tomomitsu Satho4, Hamdan Ahmad2, Fatimah Bt Abang5, Yuki Fukumitsu4, Abu Hassan Ahmad2.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Due to problems with chemical control, there is increasing interest in the use of microsporidia for control of lepidopteran pests. However, there have been few studies to evaluate the susceptibility of exotic species to microsporidia from indigenous Lepidoptera. METHODOLOGY/PRINCIPALEntities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2013 PMID: 24349104 PMCID: PMC3859509 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0081642
Source DB: PubMed Journal: PLoS One ISSN: 1932-6203 Impact factor: 3.240
The SSUrRNA sequences of microsporidia used for phylogenetic analysis.
| Accession NO. | Microsporidia | Host | ||
| Genus and species | Order | Family | ||
| – | m-PX |
| Lepidoptera | Plutellidae |
| – | m-SL |
| Lepidoptera | Noctuidae |
| AB125666 |
|
| Lepidoptera | Bombycidae |
| AB093008 |
|
| Lepidoptera | Bombycidae |
| L39111 |
|
| Lepidoptera | Bombycidae |
| AB125664 |
|
| Lepidoptera | Bombycidae |
| AY259631 |
|
| Lepidoptera | Noctuidae |
| AB036052 |
|
| Lepidoptera | Saturniidae |
| DQ919077 |
|
| Lepidoptera | Pieridae |
| AF240352 |
|
| Lepidoptera | Choreutidae |
| AY211392 |
|
| Lepidoptera | Noctuidae |
| AY747307 |
|
| Lepidoptera | Noctuidae |
| DQ073396 |
|
| Lepidoptera | Saturniidae |
| AY960987 |
|
| Lepidoptera | Plutellidae |
| AJ012606 |
|
| Lepidoptera | Arctiidae |
| U09282 |
|
| Lepidoptera | Noctuidae |
| AY958071 |
|
| Lepidoptera | Crambidae |
| AF327408 |
|
| Decapoda | Parastacidae |
| AJ0118331 |
|
| Amphipoda | Gammaridae |
| U26532 |
|
| Lepidoptera | Pyralidae |
| AF124331 |
|
| Lepidoptera | Plutellidae |
| AJ131646 |
|
| Lepidoptera | Plutellidae |
| AF240355 |
|
| Lepidoptera | Bombycidae |
| AY741104 |
|
| Hymenoptera | Apidae |
Sizes of m-PX and m-SL from different studies.
| Microsporidia(Referred name) | Size (µm) | Reference |
| m-PX( | 5.381±0.207×2.742±0.115 µm(fresh) 5.029±0.071×3.814±0.120 µm (stained) | Presentstudy |
| m-PX( | 4.20±0.1×2.0±0.1 µm (fresh)3.50±0.13×2.1±0.06 µm (stained) |
|
| m-PX( | 3.96±0.21×1.88±0.10 µm |
|
| m-SL( | 5.034±0.101 µm×4.929±0.111 µm (fresh)4.938±0.298 µm×2.508±0.159 µm (stained) | Currentstudy |
| SL ( | 4.46×1.64 µm |
|
| SL( | 4.00±0.17×1.90±0.12 µm |
|
Figure 1Agarose gel electrophoresis of PCR products.
Amplification with the primer set 18f/1537r. Lane 1∶1 kb DNA ladder (Invitrogen). Lane 2: SSUrRNA of m-PX; Lane 3: SSUrRNA of m-SL; and Lane 4: Negative control (without template).
Figure 2Phylogenetic relationships among microsporidia isolated from various hosts based on SSUrRNA.
The tree was generated by the neighbor-joining method using Kimura two-parameter distances.
Figure 3m-PX (arrow) spores in the epithelial cells of the intestine of SE (A) and SL tissue with perforation of the entire wall of the intestine and breakdown of the mucosal barrier.
The arrow indicates an m-PX spore in an epithelial cell of the SL intestine (B).
Figure 4Amounts of P. xylostella spores found in S. exigua (A) and S. litura (B) larval samples collected at different time points following feeding on mustard leaves contaminated with different doses of the parasite spores.
Physiologically similar larvae of each species maintained on the same diet but without spores served as controls.
Figure 5Mortality patterns of S. exigua (A) and S. litura (B) larval samples taken at different time points after feeding on mustard leaves contaminated with different doses of the parasite spores.
Physiologically similar larvae of each species maintained on the same diet but without spores served as controls.