| Literature DB >> 24349092 |
Hao Xue1, Jianli Wang2, Jinhong Hou2, Hang Zhu1, Jingsheng Gao2, Shuohua Chen2, Yutang Wang1, Yundai Chen1, Shouling Wu2.
Abstract
UNLABELLED: Increased levels of the inflammatory biomarker high-sensitivity C-reactive protein (hs-CRP) are associated with increased risk of cardiovascular disease. However, ideal cardiovascular health indicates lower risk of cardiovascular disease. This study aimed to investigate the effect of ideal cardiovascular health behaviors and health factors on hs-CRP levels among a hypertensive population. From 2006 to 2007, a cross-sectional study was conducted to survey 41,476 hypertensive subjects among the employees of Kailuan Corporation. Data from unified questionnaires and blood biochemical examinations were collected. The effects of ideal cardiovascular health behaviors and health factors on hs-CRP levels were evaluated through multivariate logistic regression analysis. A negative correlation was observed between hs-CRP levels and the number of ideal cardiovascular health metrics. The mean hs-CRP levels of subjects with zero to one, two, three, and four to six ideal cardiovascular health metrics were 1.11, 0.96, 0.90, and 0.80 mg/L, respectively (P<0.01). Multivariate logistic regression analysis revealed that after adjustment for sex, age, triglyceride, low-density lipoprotein cholesterol, high-density lipoprotein cholesterol, and other risk factors, the risks for subjects with two, three, and four to six ideal health metrics with serum hs-CRP >3 mg/L were lower than those with zero to one ideal health metrics, with corresponding odd ratios of 0.86 (95%CI: 0.79-0.93, P<0.01), 0.76 (95%CI: 0.69-0.83, P<0.01), and 0.68 (95%CI: 0.64-0.75, P<0.01), respectively. This finding suggests that ideal cardiovascular health behaviors and health factors were related to decreased hs-CRP levels in a hypertensive population. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION: UNIQUE IDENTIFIER: ChiCTR-TNC-11001489.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2013 PMID: 24349092 PMCID: PMC3862853 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0081597
Source DB: PubMed Journal: PLoS One ISSN: 1932-6203 Impact factor: 3.240
The baseline Characteristics of the hypertensive population.
| hs-CRP≤3 mg/L | hs-CRP>3 mg/L |
|
| |
| Gender Female (%) | 4634 (13.8) | 1508 (19.3) | 151.41 | <0.01 |
| Age (Year) | 54.7±11.3 | 58.6±11.1 | −27.04 | <0.01 |
| Non-smoking n (%) | 19794 (59.0) | 13767 (41.0) | 53.25 | <0.01 |
| Ideal BMI n (%) | 10027 (29.8) | 1994 (25.5) | 58.12 | <0.01 |
| Ideal diet n (%) | 3109 (9.3) | 593 (8.4) | 7.55 | <0.01 |
| Ideal physical activity n (%) | 6372 (19) | 1242 (17.6) | 7.20 | <0.01 |
| Ideal TC n (%) | 17566 (52.2) | 3626 (46.3) | 88.69 | <0.01 |
| Ideal blood glucose n (%) | 26028 (77.4) | 5253 (67.1) | 262.20 | <0.01 |
| LDL-C (mmol/L) | 2.50±0.84 | 2.20±1.32 | 19.37 | <0.01 |
| HDL-C (mmol/L) | 1.57±0.41 | 1.56±0.43 | 1.57 | >0.1 |
| TG (mmol/L) | 1.87±1.49 | 1.93±1.48 | −3.25 | <0.01 |
| SBP (mmHg) | 147.8±17.7 | 149.4±18.4 | −6.76 | <0.01 |
| DBP (mmHg) | 92.7±10.3 | 92.1±10.8 | 4.56 | >0.1 |
| Lipid-lowering drugs n (%) | 518 (1.5) | 166 (2.1) | 24.07 | <0.01 |
| Drinking n (%) | 19715 (58.7) | 4582 (64.4) | 78.88 | <0.01 |
Note: Continuous variables were presented as mean ± standard deviation (SD), and dichotomous variables as numbers and percentages. BMI: Body Mass Index; FBG: Fasting Blood Glucose; TC: Total Cholesterol; TG: Triacylglycerols; HDL-C: High Density Lipoprotein Cholesterol; LDL-C: Low Density Lipoprotein Cholesterol; SBP: Systolic blood pressure; DBP: Diastolic blood pressure.
Figure 1Serum hs-CRP indifferent groups of Ideal Cardiovascular Health Metrics in the hypertensive population, different genders hypertensive population.
The hs-CRP levels are presented as box (median, 25th percentile, 75th percentile) and whisker (2.5th and 97.5th percentiles) plots.
Impact of Ideal Cardiovascular Health Behaviors and Health Factors on hsCPR Levels.
| No. of Metrics | Model 1 | Model 2 | Model 3 | ||||||
| OR | 95%CI | P | OR | 95%CI | P | OR | 95%CI | P | |
| 0–1 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 1.00 | ||||||
| 2 | 0.69 | 0.64–0.74 | 0.001 | 0.62 | 0.58–0.67 | 0.001 | 0.86 | 0.79–0.93 | 0.001 |
| 3 | 0.66 | 0.61–0.71 | 0.001 | 0.63 | 0.58–0.68 | 0.001 | 0.76 | 0.69–0.83 | 0.001 |
| 4–6 | 0.64 | 0.60–0.68 | 0.001 | 0.59 | 0.56–0.63 | 0.001 | 0.68 | 0.64–0.75 | 0.001 |
Model 1: Single-factor analysis; Model 2: Adjustment for gender and age; Model 3: Further adjustment for TG, LDL-C, HDL-C, and administration history of lipid-lowering drugs based on Model 2.