| Literature DB >> 24348991 |
Xin Hao1, Kangcheng Wang1, Wenfu Li1, Wenjing Yang1, Dongtao Wei1, Jiang Qiu1, Qinglin Zhang1.
Abstract
Cognitive styles can be characterized as individual differences in the way people perceive, think, solve problems, learn, and relate to others. Field dependence/independence (FDI) is an important and widely studied dimension of cognitive styles. Although functional imaging studies have investigated the brain activation of FDI cognitive styles, the combined structural and functional correlates with individual differences in a large sample have never been investigated. In the present study, we investigated the neural correlates of individual differences in FDI cognitive styles by analyzing the correlations between Embedded Figures Test (EFT) score and structural neuroimaging data [regional gray matter volume (rGMV) was assessed using voxel-based morphometry (VBM)]/functional neuroimaging data [resting-brain functions were measured by amplitude of low-frequency fluctuation (ALFF)] throughout the whole brain. Results showed that the increased rGMV in the left inferior parietal lobule (IPL) was associated with the EFT score, which might be the structural basis of effective local processing. Additionally, a significant positive correlation between ALFF and EFT score was found in the fronto-parietal network, including the left inferior parietal lobule (IPL) and the medial prefrontal cortex (mPFC). We speculated that the left IPL might be associated with superior feature identification, and mPFC might be related to cognitive inhibition of global processing bias. These results suggested that the underlying neuroanatomical and functional bases were linked to the individual differences in FDI cognitive styles and emphasized the important contribution of superior local processing ability and cognitive inhibition to field-independent style.Entities:
Mesh:
Year: 2013 PMID: 24348991 PMCID: PMC3862473 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0078089
Source DB: PubMed Journal: PLoS One ISSN: 1932-6203 Impact factor: 3.240
Demographic and behavioral data.
| Items | Total subjects |
|---|---|
|
| |
| Number of subjects | 286 |
| Females / males | 140 / 146 |
| Age (years) | 20.01 ± 1.33 (18-26) |
| CRT score | 65.90 ± 3.45 (49-72) |
| EFT score | 13.66 ± 3.03 (6-20) |
|
| |
| Number of subjects | 261 |
| Females / males | 132 / 129 |
| Age (years) | 20.03 ± 1.36 (18-26) |
| CRT score | 65.89 ± 3.42 (49-72) |
| EFT score | 13.63 ± 3.07 (6-20) |
A total of 286 subjects were included in the VBM analysis. From that sample, 261 subjects were included in the ALFF analysis.
Abbreviations: VBM, voxe-based morphometry; ALFF, amplitude of low-frequency fluctuation; EFT, embedded figures test.
Figure 1Regions of correlation between rGMV and EFT score
(.
(A) The left IPL in which variability in rGMV exhibited significant positive correlation with EFT score (n=286) is superimposed on a standard T1-weighted template brain in MNI stereotactic space. (B) A scatterplot between left IPL volume and EFT score adjusted for age, gender, and total gray matter volume is shown for illustration purpose only.
Brain regions with significant positive correlations between rGMV/ALFF values and EFT score.
| analysis | Brian regions | BA | Peak coordinates | Cluster size (voxels) |
| ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
|
| |||||
| VBM | Left IPL | 40 | -65 | -32 | 30 | 661 | 5.34 |
| ALFF | Left IPL | 40 | -48 | -39 | 45 | 97 | 4.74 |
| mPFC | 10 | 0 | 48 | -6 | 63 | 4.15 | |
No regions showed significant negative correlations between rGMV/ALFF and EFT score.
Abbreviations: rGMV, regional gray matter volume; ALFF, amplitude of low-frequency fluctuation; EFT, embedded figures test; BA, Brodmann areas; IPL, inferior parietal lobule; mPFC, medial prefrontal cortex.
Figure 2ALFF was positively correlated with individual EFT score.
In the left panel, results are shown with p < 0.0005 uncorrected for visualization purposes. (A) Coronal view. Regions of significant correlation are shown in the left IPL; (B) Sagittal view. Regions of significant correlation are shown in the mPFC. The right panel shows corresponding scatterplots of the relationship between the EFT score and ALFF values of the significant cluster in the region of the left panel. The scatterplots adjusted for age, gender, CRT score are shown for illustration purpose only.