| Literature DB >> 24348790 |
Yunqin Xu1, Qiang Li1, Peihua Su1, Tugang Shen1, Yazhong Zhu1.
Abstract
The aim of this study was to evaluate the clinical value of multidetector-row computed tomography (MDCT) and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) in the diagnosis and treatment of complex fractures of the tibial plateau. A total of 71 patients with complex fractures of the tibial plateau (estimated Schatzker classifications III, V and VI) were included in this study. The X-ray, MDCT and MRI data obtained from the patients were analyzed. MDCT was the most sensitive method in the diagnosis of tibial articular surface collapse, cruciate ligament tibial avulsion fracture, degree of fracture comminution and degree of fracture displacement (P<0.01). MRI was the most sensitive method in the diagnosis of injuries of the cruciate and collateral ligaments, menisci and cartilage peeling of the articular surfaces (P<0.01). MDCT and MRI were demonstrated to be more sensitive than X-rays for the diagnosis of insidious damage around the knee.Entities:
Keywords: X-ray computed tomography; diagnosis; magnetic resonance imaging; tibial fractures
Year: 2013 PMID: 24348790 PMCID: PMC3861471 DOI: 10.3892/etm.2013.1380
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Exp Ther Med ISSN: 1792-0981 Impact factor: 2.447
Comparison of the satisfaction scores from X-ray, MDCT and MRI for the diagnosis of fractures of the tibial plateau.
| Variable | Case (n) | Fracture sites | Severity of bone comminution | Fracture displacement | Bone defects |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| X-ray | 71 | 1.04±0.20 | 0.81±0.51 | 1.23±0.48 | 0.36±0.51 |
| MDCT | 71 | 1.82±0.38 | 1.92±0.26 | 1.92±0.26 | 1.55±0.79 |
| MRI | 71 | 1.12±0.33 | 0.83±0.60 | 0.46±0.58 | 0.26±0.53 |
| F | - | 131.06 | 119.99 | 173.05 | 91.46 |
| P-value | - | <0.01 | <0.01 | <0.01 | <0.01 |
Scores are presented as the mean ± standard deviation.
P<0.01 compared with X-ray film;
P<0.01 compared with multidetector-row computed tomography (MDCT).
MRI, magnetic resonance imaging.
Comparison of examination results from X-ray, MDCT and MRI for the diagnosis of knee injuries.
| Variable | Case (n) | Joint surface collapse | Other (cruciate ligament+meniscus+collateral ligament injury) |
|---|---|---|---|
| X-ray | 71 | 16 | 4(3+0+1) |
| MDCT | 71 | 61 | 11 |
| MRI | 71 | 12 | 31 |
| χ2 | - | 85.7327 | 32.6626 |
| P-value | - | <0.01 | <0.01 |
P<0.01 compared with X-ray;
P<0.01 compared with multidetector-row computed tomography (MDCT).
MRI, magnetic resonance imaging.
Figure 1Female, 38 years old, with collapse fractures of the right tibial platform. (A) Preoperative X-ray. (B) Preoperative computed tomography (CT) scan showing the lateral central collapse of the right tibial platform of ~2 cm. (C) Preoperative magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) scan showing the lateral tibial plateau fracture and the complete disruption of the medial collateral ligment. (D) Postoperative X-ray images showing the anatomical reduction of the right lateral tibial plateau fracture and the flat joint surface.
Figure 3Male, 39 years old, with a tibial plateau fracture of the right tibial platform and a comminuted fracture of the small head of the fibula. (A) Preoperative X-ray. (B) Preoperative computed tomography (CT) and 3D reconstruction showing the comminuted fracture of the right tibial plateau, the collapse site in the lateral and posterior plateau and the comminuted fracture of the small head of the fibula. (C) Preoperative magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) showing the comminuted fracture of the right tibial plateau. The interior and posterior plateau collapses were serious. (D) One year following surgery, the X-ray showed that the right tibial plateau fracture fixation was good and that the joint surface was flat.