| Literature DB >> 24348588 |
Koo Hui Chin1, Daniel Robert Sathyasurya1, Hazizi Abu Saad2, Hamid Jan B Jan Mohamed1.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: The Malaysian Health and morbidity Survey (2006) reported the highest prevalence of type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) among the Indian population compared to the Malay and Chinese populations. Many studies have supported the important role of adiponectin in insulin-sensitizing, which is associated with T2DM. These studies have raised a research question whether the variation in prevalence is related to the adiponectin concentrations or the lifestyle factors.Entities:
Keywords: Adiponectin; Chinese; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Diet Records; Indian; Malaysia; Motor Activity
Year: 2013 PMID: 24348588 PMCID: PMC3860115 DOI: 10.5812/ijem.8298
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Int J Endocrinol Metab ISSN: 1726-913X
Demographic Characteristics of the Study Variables (n = 210; 70 Malay, 70 Chinese and 70 Indians)
| Characteristic | Malay | Chinese | Indian | Total | P value |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
| 56.70 ± 10.21 | 59.77 ± 10.01 | 53.07 ± 8.28 | 56.37 ± 10.23 | < 0.001
[ |
|
| 0.873
[ | ||||
| Male | 29 (13.8) | 31 (14.8) | 32 (15.2) | 92 (43.8) | |
| Female | 41 (19.5) | 39 (18.6) | 38 (18.1) | 118 (56.2) | |
|
| 0.543
[ | ||||
| Single | 3 (1.4) | 1 (0.5) | 2 (1.0) | 6 (2.9) | |
| Married | 66 (31.3) | 69 (32.9) | 66 (31.4) | 201 (95.6) | |
| Widow/ widower | 1 (0.5) | 0 (0.0) | 2 (1.0) | 3 (1.5) | |
|
| 0.021
[ | ||||
| Housewife | 33 (15.7) | 38 (18.1) | 34 (16.2) | 105 (50.0) | |
| Retired | 15 (7.1) | 17 (8.1) | 8 (3.8) | 40 (19.0) | |
| Self-employed | 2 (1.0) | 3 (1.4) | 4 (1.9) | 9 (4.3) | |
| Civil servant | 11 (5.2) | 2 (1.0) | 4 (1.9) | 17 (8.1) | |
|
| 0.048
[ | ||||
| Non-educated | 11 (5.2) | 24 (11.4) | 13 (6.2) | 48 (22.8) | |
| Primary | 29 (13.8) | 17 (8.1) | 27 (12.9) | 73 (34.8) | |
| Secondary | 26 (12.4) | 28 (13.3) | 29 (13.8) | 83 (39.5) | |
| Tertiary | 4 (1.9) | 1 (0.5) | 1 (0.5) | 6 (2.9) |
aSD: Standard deviation
bOne way Analysis of Variance
cBonferroni test; 2 Chi-square test
Descriptive Statistics of the Study Variables (n = 210; 70 Malay, 70 Chinese and 70 Indians)
| Variables | Total, Mean ± SD
[ | Malay, Mean ± SD | Chinese, Mean ± SD | Indian, Mean ± SD | F ratio | P value
[ |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
| ||||||
| BMI
| 27.50 ± 5.03 | 28.17 ± 5.51 | 26.54 ± 4.03 | 27.78 ± 5.34 | 2.02 | 0.135 |
| Body fat status, % | 32.23 ± 7.10 | 32.30 ± 7.24 | 31.17 ± 6.31 | 33.21 ± 7.64 | 1.46 | 0.234 |
| WC
| 93.56 ± 11.49 | 94.17 ± 12.69 | 91.90 ± 9.01 | 94.61 ± 12.38 | 1.13 | 0.326 |
| Waist hip ratio | 0.91 ± 0.07 | 0.91 ± 0.08 | 0.90 ± 0.06 | 0.92 ± 0.06 | 0.58 | 0.561 |
| Visceral fat level | 13.29 ± 5.92 | 14.10 ± 6.42 | 12.06 ± 4.81 | 13.70 ± 6.27 | 2.37 | 0.096 |
|
| ||||||
| Adiponectin, μg/ml | 6.01 ± 3.71 | 6.85 ± 4.66 a | 6.21 ± 3.62 | 4.98 ± 2.22 b | 3.54 | 0.010 |
| FBS
| 10.29 ± 5.81 | 10.48 ± 3.97 | 9.25 ± 3.48 | 11.15 ± 8.51 | 2.13 | 0.122 |
| HbA1c, % | 8.52 ± 1.73 | 8.53 ± 1.69 | 8.10 ± 1.65 c | 8.93 ± 1.78 d | 4.15 | 0.017 |
| TC
| 5.06 ± 1.15 | 5.20 ± 1.13 | 5.06 ± 1.11 | 4.94 ± 1.20 | 0.91 | 0.403 |
| LDL
| 3.29 ± 0.90 | 3.33 ± 0.96 | 3.25 ± 0.90 | 3.28 ±0.84 | 0.14 | 0.868 |
| HDL
| 1.00 ± 0.35 | 1.05 ± 0.50 e | 1.03 ± 0.29 | 0.91 ± 0.16 f | 4.43 | 0.013 |
| TG
| 1.89 ± 1.20 | 2.06 ± 1.30 | 1.84 ± 1.09 | 1.78 ± 1.20 | 1.10 | 0.334 |
|
| ||||||
| Calorie, kcal | 1647 ± 564.44 | 1583 ± 477.40 | 1714 ± 582.30 | 1643 ± 623.93 | 0.95 | 0.389 |
| Protein, g | 67.40 ± 22.93 | 63.24 ± 18.70 g | 75.37 ± 26.37 h | 63.58 ± 21.22 j | 6.69 | 0.002 |
| CHO
| 240.73 ± 92.63 | 236.97 ± 83.59 | 238.36 ± 87.21 | 246.87 ± 106.49 | 0.43 | 0.654 |
| Fat, g | 46.92 ± 23.41 | 44.83 ± 20.60 | 50.56 ± 26.83 | 45.38 ± 22.28 | 1.28 | 0.281 |
| Fiber, g | 7.51 ± 0.35 | 6.40 ± 0.51 k | 9.33 ± 0.71 m | 6.78 ± 0.51 n | 7.46 | 0.001 |
|
| ||||||
| MET score | 3352.53 ± 4251.35 | 3609.78 ± 4354.71 | 2595.67 ± 2801.41 | 3789.90 ± 5200.00 | 1.57 | 0.201 |
aAbbreviations: SD, Standard deviation; BMI, Body mass index; WC, Waist circumference; FBS, Fasting blood sugar; TC, Total cholesterol; LDL, Low density lipoprotein; HDL, High density lipoprotein; TG, triglyceride; CHO, Carbohydrate
bAnalysis of Variance, Bonferroni test was applied. Test shows: a vs b, P < 0.05; c vs d, P < 0.05; e vs f, P < 0.05. g vs h, P < 0.01; h vs j, P < 0.01; k vs m, P = 0.001; m vs n, P < 0.01
Pearson’s Correlation Coefficients Between Plasma Adiponectin Concentrationwith Anthropometric Measurements, Biochemical Results, Dietary Intake and Physical Activity (n = 210)
| Variables | Adiponectin Concentration | |
|---|---|---|
| R | P value | |
|
| ||
| Body mass index, kg/m 2 | -0.02 | 0.810 |
| Percentage of fat, % | 0.07 | 0.349 |
| Waist circumference, cm | -0.06 | 0.367 |
| Waist hip ratio | -0.08 | 0.267 |
| Visceral fat, level | 0.09 | 0.217 |
|
| ||
| Fasting blood sugar, mmol/L | 0.04 | 0.569 |
| HbA1c, % | -0.06 | 0.427 |
| Total cholesterol, mmol/L | 0.08 | 0.229 |
| Low density lipoprotein, mmol/L | -0.003 | 0.961 |
| High density lipoprotein, mmol/L | 0.21 | 0.002
[ |
| Triglyceride, mmol/L | -0.03 | 0.703 |
|
| ||
| Calorie, mjoule | -0.14 | 0.054 |
| Adjusted dietary carbohydrate, g | -0.12 | 0.056 |
| Adjusted dietary protein, g | -0.05 | 0.458 |
| Adjusted dietary fat, g | -0.11 | 0.102 |
| Adjusted dietary fiber, g | -0.03 | 0.671 |
|
| ||
| MET score | -0.18 | 0.007
[ |
ais significant at the 0.01 level
bis significant at the 0.05 level
Relationship Between Plasma Adiponectin Concentration with Ethnicity, Dietary Intake and Physical Activity for Type 2 Diabetes Patients Among Different Ethnic Groups (n = 210)
| Variables | Simple Linear Regression | General Linear Regression | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
b | P value |
b | P value | |
|
| 0.238 (0.649, 3.077) | 0.003 | 0.171 (0.311, 2.375) | 0.011 |
|
| -0.184 (0.000, 0.000) | 0.007 | -0.203 (0.000, 0.000) | 0.003 |
|
| -0.132 (-0.012, 0.000) | 0.056 | -0.150 (-0.013, -0.001) | 0.026 |
aCrude regression coefficient
bAdjusted regression coefficient for medical history, age, sex, total cholesterol and visceral fat Stepwise multiple linear regression method applied. Model assumptions are fulfilled. There were no interactions among independent variables. No multicollinearity detected. Coefficient of determination (R²) = 0.153
Comparison of Adiponectin Concentration between Ethnicity with Relation to Their Dietary Intake and Physical Activity for Type 2 Diabetes Patients (n = 210)
| Adiponectin | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Groups | Adj. Mean
[ | F-ratio
[ | P value
[ |
|
| 9.32 | 0.003 | |
|
Malay | 7.202 (6.298, 8.106) | ||
| Chinese | 6.687 (5.799, 7.575) | ||
|
Indian | 5.597 (4.651, 6.544) | ||
aTotal MET score, fat, protein, carbohydrate and fiber adjusted;
bTest shows: Malay vs. Indian P < 0.05;