| Literature DB >> 24348192 |
Benfu Zhao1, Jianhua Xu1, Zhongsheng Chen2, Ling Bai1, Peng Li1.
Abstract
The temperature data from 3 meteorological stations (Kashi, Ruoqiang, and Hotan) in the South of Tarim River Basin (STRB) during 1964-2011 were analyzed by Mann-Kendall test and correlation analysis. The results from Mann-Kendall test show that the surface temperature (ST), 850 hPa temperature (T850), and 700 hPa temperature (T700) exhibited upward trends, while 300 hPa temperature (T300) revealed a downward trend. On the whole, the change rate of ST, T850, T700, and T300 was 0.26~0.46°C/10a, 0.15~0.40°C/10a, 0.03~0.10°C/10a, and -0.38~-0.13°C/10a, respectively. For the periods, ST and T850 declined during 1964-1997 and then rose during 1998-2011. T700 declined during 1964-2005 and then rose during 2006-2011, while T300 rose from 1964 to 1970s and then declined. The results from correlation analysis show that T850 and T700 positively correlated with ST (P<0.01) at the all three stations and there was a negative correlation between T300 and ST at Hotan (P<0.1), while the correlation is not significant at Kashi and Ruoqiang. The results indicate that there were gradient differences in the response of upper-air temperature (UT) to ST change.Entities:
Mesh:
Year: 2013 PMID: 24348192 PMCID: PMC3853308 DOI: 10.1155/2013/894851
Source DB: PubMed Journal: ScientificWorldJournal ISSN: 1537-744X
Figure 1The sketch map of study area in Xinjiang, China.
The stations of the Southern Tarim River Basin.
| Station name | Landscapes | Longitude (/°E) | Latitude (/°N) | Elevation (/m) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Kashi | Plain | 75.98 | 39.47 | 1,291 |
| Hotan | Plain | 79.93 | 37.13 | 1,375 |
| Ruoqiang | Basin | 88.17 | 39.03 | 889 |
Figure 2The temperature change of three stations.
The test results of change trends and abrupt changes of the three stations.
| Temperature | Trend test | Abrupt change points | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Trend rate (°C/10a) |
| Significance level | ||
| Kashi station | ||||
| ST | 0.34 | 4.03 | 0.05 | 1999 |
| T850 | 0.15 | 1.7954 | — | 1997 |
| T700 | 0.025 | 0.32 | — | 2007 |
| T300 | −0.21 | −2.8975 | 0.05 | 1975 |
|
| ||||
| Ruoqiang station | ||||
| ST | 0.27 | 4.817 | 0.05 | 1990 |
| T850 | 0.18 | 2.7553 | 0.05 | 1997 |
| T700 | 0.07 | 1.2443 | — | 2005 |
| T300 | −0.12 | −1.3332 | — | 1971 |
|
| ||||
| Hotan station | ||||
| ST | 0.46 | 5.39 | 0.05 | 1997 |
| T850 | 0.37 | 2.7197 | 0.05 | 1998 |
| T700 | 0.10 | 1.3154 | — | 2004 |
| T300 | −0.38 | −3.2708 | 0.05 | 1979 |
Figure 3Abrupt change point analysis of three stations.
Figure 4The difference in mean temperature of abrupt change before and after.
Correlation analysis of ST and UT.
| Pearson correlation | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Stations | Kashi | Ruoqiang | Hotan |
| ST and T850 | 0.812** | 0.752** | 0.480** |
| ST and T700 | 0.602** | 0.532** | 0.529** |
| ST and T300 | −0.142 | −0.025 | −0.268* |
Note: **correlation is significant at the 0.01 level (2-tailed); *correlation is significant at the 0.1 level (2-tailed).
Correlation analysis of ST and UT.
| Regression equation | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Station | Kashi |
| Ruoqiang | R2 | Hotan | R2 |
| ST & T850 |
| 0.66 |
| 0.57 |
| 0.23 |
| ST & T700 |
| 0.37 |
| 0.29 |
| 0.28 |
| ST & T300 |
| 0.02 |
| 0.00 |
| 0.07 |
Note: x-ST, y 1-T850, y 2-T700, y 3-T300; acorrelation is significant at the 0.01 level; bcorrelation is significant at the 0.1 level.