| Literature DB >> 24348140 |
Nelly Molina Frechero1, Leonor Sánchez Pérez1, Enrique Castañeda Castaneira1, Anastasio Oropeza Oropeza1, Enrique Gaona1, José Salas Pacheco2, Ronell Bologna Molina3.
Abstract
Fluoride is ingested primarily through consuming drinking water. When drinking water contains fluoride concentrations>0.7 parts per million (ppm), consuming such water can be toxic to the human body; this toxicity is called "fluorosis." Therefore, it is critical to determine the fluoride concentrations in drinking water. The objective of this study was to determine the fluoride concentration in the drinking water of the city of Durango. The wells that supply the drinking water distribution system for the city of Durango were studied. One hundred eighty-nine (189) water samples were analyzed, and the fluoride concentration in each sample was quantified as established by the law NMX-AA-077-SCFI-2001. The fluoride concentrations in such samples varied between 2.22 and 7.23 ppm with a 4.313±1.318 ppm mean concentration. The highest values were observed in the northern area of the city, with a 5.001±2.669 ppm mean value. The samples produced values that exceeded the national standard for fluoride in drinking water. Chronic exposure to fluoride at such concentrations produces harmful health effects, the first sign of which is dental fluorosis. Therefore, it is essential that the government authorities implement water defluoridation programs and take preventative measures to reduce the ingestion of this toxic halogen.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2013 PMID: 24348140 PMCID: PMC3856142 DOI: 10.1155/2013/186392
Source DB: PubMed Journal: ScientificWorldJournal ISSN: 1537-744X
Figure 1Map depicting the Durango city and state locations in the Mexican Republic.
Figure 2Location of wells in the city, which are distributed by geographic region (north, south, and central).
Figure 3Fluoride concentration distribution in the city of Durango by region.
Mean fluoride concentrations by region in the city of Durango. The three geographic regions yielded significantly different values using ANOVA (P < 0.00).
| Geographic region | Mean fluoride concentration (ppm) | Number of wells | Standard error | Confidence interval (95%) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Central region | 2.551 | 7 | 0.137 | [2.820, 2.283] |
| Northern region | 5.300 | 31 | 0.170 | [5.633, 4.968] |
| Southern region | 3.582 | 25 | 0.157 | [3.890, 3.274] |
Figure 4Fluoride concentration distribution in the city of Durango.
Figure 5Fluoride concentration frequency distribution in the three regions of the city of Durango.