Literature DB >> 24347441

Divergent coverage, frequency and costs of organised and opportunistic Pap testing in Finland.

Heini Salo1, Pekka Nieminen, Terhi Kilpi, Kari Auranen, Tuija Leino, Simopekka Vänskä, Petri Tiihonen, Matti Lehtinen, Ahti Anttila.   

Abstract

We evaluated the overall coverage, frequency and costs of Pap testing by screening modality and health care provider in Finland. Information about Pap testing in the Finnish female population of 2.7 million was obtained from nationwide population-based registry data. Among women aged 25-69 years, 87% had had a Pap test taken within or outside the organised programme at least once during the last 5 years and half of those screened in the organised programme had also had at least one Pap test taken outside the programme. Of the annual average of 530,000 Pap tests taken, 84% were taken for screening purposes and 16% as follow-up. Forty percent of the 446,000 annual screening tests were taken in the organised programme, 55% as opportunistic tests in public primary or student health care or by private providers and 5% in public secondary health care. One-fifth of all opportunistic screening Pap tests were taken from women aged <25. The voluminous opportunistic Pap testing in public primary health care was concentrated in young women aged 25-29 whereas the bulk of opportunistic testing in private health occurred in age groups eligible for organised screening. The total cost of all screening Pap tests was €22.4 million, of which 71% incurred in opportunistic screening. Of the 84,000 annual follow-up Pap tests and their €8.3 million total costs, ∼60% incurred in organised screening or in secondary health care.
© 2013 UICC.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Pap test; cervical cancer screening; costs; opportunistic screening; organised programme; screening coverage

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 24347441     DOI: 10.1002/ijc.28646

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Cancer        ISSN: 0020-7136            Impact factor:   7.396


  12 in total

Review 1.  HPV-FASTER: broadening the scope for prevention of HPV-related cancer.

Authors:  F Xavier Bosch; Claudia Robles; Mireia Díaz; Marc Arbyn; Iacopo Baussano; Christine Clavel; Guglielmo Ronco; Joakim Dillner; Matti Lehtinen; Karl-Ulrich Petry; Mario Poljak; Susanne K Kjaer; Chris J L M Meijer; Suzanne M Garland; Jorge Salmerón; Xavier Castellsagué; Laia Bruni; Silvia de Sanjosé; Jack Cuzick
Journal:  Nat Rev Clin Oncol       Date:  2015-09-01       Impact factor: 66.675

2.  High lifetime probability of screen-detected cervical abnormalities.

Authors:  Maiju Pankakoski; Sirpa Heinävaara; Tytti Sarkeala; Ahti Anttila
Journal:  J Med Screen       Date:  2017-01-10       Impact factor: 2.136

3.  Nationwide cervical cancer screening in Korea: data from the National Health Insurance Service Cancer Screening Program and National Cancer Screening Program, 2009-2014.

Authors:  Seung Hyuk Shim; Hyeongsu Kim; In Sook Sohn; Han Sung Hwang; Han Sung Kwon; Sun Joo Lee; Ji Young Lee; Soo Nyung Kim; Kunsei Lee; Sounghoon Chang
Journal:  J Gynecol Oncol       Date:  2017-05-26       Impact factor: 4.401

4.  Moving towards an organized cervical cancer screening: costs and impact.

Authors:  Mireia Diaz; David Moriña; Vanesa Rodríguez-Salés; Raquel Ibáñez; Josep Alfons Espinás; Silvia de Sanjosé
Journal:  Eur J Public Health       Date:  2018-12-01       Impact factor: 3.367

5.  Effectiveness of cervical cancer screening at age 65 - A register-based cohort study.

Authors:  Maiju Pankakoski; Ahti Anttila; Tytti Sarkeala; Sirpa Heinävaara
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2019-03-26       Impact factor: 3.240

6.  The costs of offering HPV-testing on self-taken samples to non-attendees of cervical screening in Finland.

Authors:  Anni Virtanen; Ahti Anttila; Pekka Nieminen
Journal:  BMC Womens Health       Date:  2015-11-05       Impact factor: 2.809

7.  Self-sampling in cervical cancer screening: comparison of a brush-based and a lavage-based cervicovaginal self-sampling device.

Authors:  Liisa Karjalainen; Ahti Anttila; Pekka Nieminen; Tapio Luostarinen; Anni Virtanen
Journal:  BMC Cancer       Date:  2016-03-15       Impact factor: 4.430

8.  Disparities in cervical screening participation: a comparison of Russian, Somali and Kurdish immigrants with the general Finnish population.

Authors:  Esther E Idehen; Päivikki Koponen; Tommi Härkänen; Mari Kangasniemi; Anna-Maija Pietilä; Tellervo Korhonen
Journal:  Int J Equity Health       Date:  2018-05-04

9.  Organised Versus Opportunistic Cervical Cancer Screening in Urban and Rural Regions of Lithuania.

Authors:  Justina Paulauskiene; Rugile Ivanauskiene; Erika Skrodeniene; Janina Petkeviciene
Journal:  Medicina (Kaunas)       Date:  2019-09-06       Impact factor: 2.430

10.  The Cost-Effectiveness Analysis of Cervical Cancer Screening Using a Systematic Invitation System in Lithuania.

Authors:  Justina Paulauskiene; Mindaugas Stelemekas; Rugile Ivanauskiene; Janina Petkeviciene
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2019-12-11       Impact factor: 3.390

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.