Literature DB >> 24347309

Identification of the PKR nuclear interactome reveals roles in ribosome biogenesis, mRNA processing and cell division.

William L Blalock1, Manuela Piazzi, Alberto Bavelloni, Mirco Raffini, Irene Faenza, Antonietta D'Angelo, Lucio Cocco.   

Abstract

The double-strand RNA-dependent protein kinase, PKR, plays a central role in inflammatory/chronic stress-mediated pathologies such as cancer, diabetes, and neuro/muscular degenerative diseases. Although a significant amount of research has been conducted to elucidate the role of PKR signaling in the cytosol, only recently has attention been paid to the role of PKR in the nuclear compartment. Previously our group reported that phosphorylated forms of PKR are present in the nucleus of acute leukemic cell lines, representing a reservoir of active kinase that responds to stress. Using the CCRF-CEM acute T-cell leukemia cell line, a PKR-specific inhibitor, co-immunoprecipitation and a proteomics approach, which included affinity purified mass spectrometry analysis (AP/MS), we identified the proteins present in active and inactive PKR nuclear complexes. Of the proteins identified in the PKR complexes, sixty-nine (69) were specific to the active complex, while thirty-eight (38) were specific to the inactive complex. An additional thirteen (13) proteins associated specifically with both complexes. The majority of the proteins identified are involved in, ribosome biogenesis, RNA splicing, mRNA stability, gene expression, cell cycle, or chromatin organization, including several with known significance to normal hematopoiesis and/or hematological disease. In agreement with the AP/MS data, basal- or over-expression of PKR under normal growth conditions favored cell proliferation in the tested cell lines, whereas pharmacological inhibition of PKR or shRNA-mediated knock-down did not. PKR was also found to influence the isoform and the level of expression of the proto-oncogene MYC.
© 2013 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24347309     DOI: 10.1002/jcp.24529

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Cell Physiol        ISSN: 0021-9541            Impact factor:   6.384


  10 in total

Review 1.  Discriminating Self and Non-Self by RNA: Roles for RNA Structure, Misfolding, and Modification in Regulating the Innate Immune Sensor PKR.

Authors:  Chelsea M Hull; Philip C Bevilacqua
Journal:  Acc Chem Res       Date:  2016-06-08       Impact factor: 22.384

2.  Identification of Kinases and Interactors of p53 Using Kinase-Catalyzed Cross-Linking and Immunoprecipitation.

Authors:  Satish Garre; Aparni K Gamage; Todd R Faner; Pavithra Dedigama-Arachchige; Mary Kay H Pflum
Journal:  J Am Chem Soc       Date:  2018-11-13       Impact factor: 15.419

3.  PKR is activated by cellular dsRNAs during mitosis and acts as a mitotic regulator.

Authors:  Yoosik Kim; Jung Hyun Lee; Jong-Eun Park; Jun Cho; Hyerim Yi; V Narry Kim
Journal:  Genes Dev       Date:  2014-06-15       Impact factor: 11.361

4.  Genome-wide association analyses identify known and novel loci for teat number in Duroc pigs using single-locus and multi-locus models.

Authors:  Zhanwei Zhuang; Rongrong Ding; Longlong Peng; Jie Wu; Yong Ye; Shenping Zhou; Xingwang Wang; Jianping Quan; Enqin Zheng; Gengyuan Cai; Wen Huang; Jie Yang; Zhenfang Wu
Journal:  BMC Genomics       Date:  2020-05-07       Impact factor: 3.969

5.  Signaling by the integrated stress response kinase PKR is fine-tuned by dynamic clustering.

Authors:  Francesca Zappa; Nerea L Muniozguren; Maxwell Z Wilson; Michael S Costello; Jose Carlos Ponce-Rojas; Diego Acosta-Alvear
Journal:  J Cell Biol       Date:  2022-05-06       Impact factor: 8.077

6.  Revealing new candidate genes for reproductive traits in pigs: combining Bayesian GWAS and functional pathways.

Authors:  Lucas L Verardo; Fabyano F Silva; Marcos S Lopes; Ole Madsen; John W M Bastiaansen; Egbert F Knol; Mathew Kelly; Luis Varona; Paulo S Lopes; Simone E F Guimarães
Journal:  Genet Sel Evol       Date:  2016-02-01       Impact factor: 4.297

7.  A systematic study of nuclear interactome of C-terminal domain small phosphatase-like 2 using inducible expression system and shotgun proteomics.

Authors:  NaNa Kang; JaeHyung Koo; Sen Wang; Sun Jin Hur; Young Yil Bahk
Journal:  BMB Rep       Date:  2016-06       Impact factor: 4.778

8.  Distinct protein signatures of acute myeloid leukemia bone marrow-derived stromal cells are prognostic for patient survival.

Authors:  Steven M Kornblau; Peter P Ruvolo; Rui-Yu Wang; V Lokesh Battula; Elizabeth J Shpall; Vivian R Ruvolo; Teresa McQueen; YiHua Qui; Zhihong Zeng; Sherry Pierce; Rodrigo Jacamo; Suk-Young Yoo; Phuong M Le; Jeffrey Sun; Numsen Hail; Marina Konopleva; Michael Andreeff
Journal:  Haematologica       Date:  2018-03-15       Impact factor: 9.941

9.  Altered splicing and cytoplasmic levels of tRNA synthetases in SF3B1-mutant myelodysplastic syndromes as a therapeutic vulnerability.

Authors:  Fabio Giuseppe Liberante; Katrina Lappin; Eliana M Barros; Jekaterina Vohhodina; Florian Grebien; Kienan I Savage; Kenneth Ian Mills
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2019-02-25       Impact factor: 4.379

Review 10.  Glycogen synthase kinase (GSK)-3 and the double-strand RNA-dependent kinase, PKR: When two kinases for the common good turn bad.

Authors:  Manuela Piazzi; Alberto Bavelloni; Irene Faenza; William Blalock
Journal:  Biochim Biophys Acta Mol Cell Res       Date:  2020-06-05       Impact factor: 4.739

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.