Literature DB >> 24347033

Accidental dural puncture, postdural puncture headache, intrathecal catheters, and epidural blood patch: revisiting the old nemesis.

Roland Kaddoum1, Faisal Motlani, Romeo N Kaddoum, Arvi Srirajakalidindi, Deepak Gupta, Vitaly Soskin.   

Abstract

One of the controversial management options for accidental dural puncture in pregnant patients is the conversion of labor epidural analgesia to continuous spinal analgesia by threading the epidural catheter intrathecally. No clear consensus exists on how to best prevent severe headache from occurring after accidental dural puncture. To investigate whether the intrathecal placement of an epidural catheter following accidental dural puncture impacts the incidence of postdural puncture headache (PDPH) and the subsequent need for an epidural blood patch in parturients. A retrospective chart review of accidental dural puncture was performed at Hutzel Women's Hospital in Detroit, MI, USA for the years 2002-2010. Documented cases of accidental dural punctures (N = 238) were distributed into two groups based on their management: an intrathecal catheter (ITC) group in which the epidural catheter was inserted intrathecally and a non-intrathecal catheter (non-ITC) group that received the epidural catheter inserted at different levels of lumbar interspaces. The incidence of PDPH as well as the necessity for epidural blood patch was analyzed using two-tailed Fisher's exact test. In the non-ITC group, 99 (54 %) parturients developed PDPH in comparison to 20 (37 %) in the ITC [odds ratio (OR), 1.98; 95 % confidence interval (CI), 1.06-3.69; P = 0.03]. Fifty-seven (31 %) of 182 patients in the non-ITC group required an epidural blood patch (EBP) (data for 2 patients of 184 were missing). In contrast, 7 (13 %) of parturients in the ITC group required an EBP. The incidence of EBP was calculated in parturients who actually developed headache to be 57 of 99 (57 %) in the non-ITC group versus 7 of 20 (35 %) in the ITC group (OR, 2.52; 95 % CI, 0.92-6.68; P = 0.07). The insertion of an intrathecal catheter following accidental dural puncture decreases the incidence of PDPH but not the need for epidural blood patch in parturients.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 24347033     DOI: 10.1007/s00540-013-1761-y

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Anesth        ISSN: 0913-8668            Impact factor:   2.078


  21 in total

1.  PDPH is a common complication of neuraxial blockade in parturients: a meta-analysis of obstetrical studies.

Authors:  Peter T Choi; Saramin E Galinski; Lawrence Takeuchi; Stefan Lucas; Carmen Tamayo; Alejandro R Jadad
Journal:  Can J Anaesth       Date:  2003-05       Impact factor: 5.063

2.  Are subarachnoid catheters really safe?

Authors:  Meg A Rosenblatt; Howard H Bernstein; Yaakov Beilin
Journal:  Reg Anesth Pain Med       Date:  2004 May-Jun       Impact factor: 6.288

3.  Immediate management of inadvertent dural puncture during insertion of a labour epidural: a survey of Australian obstetric anaesthetists.

Authors:  M J Newman; A M Cyna
Journal:  Anaesth Intensive Care       Date:  2008-01       Impact factor: 1.669

4.  Insertion of an intrathecal catheter following accidental dural puncture: a meta-analysis.

Authors:  M Heesen; S Klöhr; R Rossaint; M Walters; S Straube; M van de Velde
Journal:  Int J Obstet Anesth       Date:  2012-12-05       Impact factor: 2.603

5.  A prospective controlled study of continuous spinal analgesia versus repeat epidural analgesia after accidental dural puncture in labour.

Authors:  I F Russell
Journal:  Int J Obstet Anesth       Date:  2011-12-06       Impact factor: 2.603

Review 6.  Can the incidence of accidental dural puncture in laboring women be reduced? A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  M Heesen; S Klöhr; R Rossaint; M Van De Velde; S Straube
Journal:  Minerva Anestesiol       Date:  2013-07-15       Impact factor: 3.051

Review 7.  Serious complications associated with external intrathecal catheters used in cancer pain patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Daniel Aprili; Oliver Bandschapp; Christoph Rochlitz; Albert Urwyler; Wilhelm Ruppen
Journal:  Anesthesiology       Date:  2009-12       Impact factor: 7.892

8.  Ten years of experience with accidental dural puncture and post-dural puncture headache in a tertiary obstetric anaesthesia department.

Authors:  M Van de Velde; R Schepers; N Berends; E Vandermeersch; F De Buck
Journal:  Int J Obstet Anesth       Date:  2008-08-08       Impact factor: 2.603

9.  Subarachnoid catheter placement after wet tap for analgesia in labor: influence on the risk of headache in obstetric patients.

Authors:  Sabry Ayad; Yousef Demian; Samer N Narouze; John E Tetzlaff
Journal:  Reg Anesth Pain Med       Date:  2003 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 6.288

10.  Previous wet tap does not reduce success rate of labor epidural analgesia.

Authors:  R Blanche; J C Eisenach; R Tuttle; D M Dewan
Journal:  Anesth Analg       Date:  1994-08       Impact factor: 5.108

View more
  2 in total

Review 1.  A Comprehensive Update on the Treatment and Management of Postdural Puncture Headache.

Authors:  Riki Patel; Ivan Urits; Vwaire Orhurhu; Mariam Salisu Orhurhu; Jacquelin Peck; Emmanuel Ohuabunwa; Andrew Sikorski; Armeen Mehrabani; Laxmaiah Manchikanti; Alan D Kaye; Rachel J Kaye; John A Helmstetter; Omar Viswanath
Journal:  Curr Pain Headache Rep       Date:  2020-04-22

2.  Insertion of an intrathecal catheter in parturients reduces the risk of post-dural puncture headache: A retrospective study and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Jiali Deng; Lizhong Wang; Yinfa Zhang; Xiangyang Chang; Xingjie Ma
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-07-05       Impact factor: 3.240

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.