Literature DB >> 24346955

Influence of experimental conditions on data variability in the liver comet assay.

M Guérard1, C Marchand, U Plappert-Helbig.   

Abstract

The in vivo comet assay has increasingly been used for regulatory genotoxicity testing in recent years. While it has been demonstrated that the experimental execution of the assay, for example, electrophoresis or scoring, can have a strong impact on the results; little is known on how initial steps, that is, from tissue sampling during necropsy up to slide preparation, can influence the comet assay results. Therefore, we investigated which of the multitude of steps in processing the liver for the comet assay are most critical. All together eight parameters were assessed by using liver samples of untreated animals. In addition, two of those parameters (temperature and storage time of liver before embedding into agarose) were further investigated in animals given a single oral dose of ethyl methanesulfonate at dose levels of 50, 100, and 200 mg/kg, 3 hr prior to necropsy. The results showed that sample cooling emerged as the predominant influence factor, whereas variations in other elements of the procedure (e.g., size of the liver piece sampled, time needed to process the liver tissue post-mortem, agarose temperature, or time of lysis) seem to be of little relevance. Storing of liver samples of up to 6 hr under cooled conditions did not cause an increase in tail intensity. In contrast, storing the tissue at room temperature, resulted in a considerable time-dependent increase in comet parameters.
Copyright © 2013 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

Entities:  

Keywords:  DNA damage; comet assay; ethyl methanesulfonate; genotoxicity; liver

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2013        PMID: 24346955     DOI: 10.1002/em.21835

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Environ Mol Mutagen        ISSN: 0893-6692            Impact factor:   3.216


  2 in total

1.  Enigmatic mechanism of the N-vinylpyrrolidone hepatocarcinogenicity in the rat.

Authors:  Franz Oesch; Daniela Fruth; Jan G Hengstler; Eric Fabian; Franz Ingo Berger; Robert Landsiedel
Journal:  Arch Toxicol       Date:  2021-09-30       Impact factor: 5.153

2.  Assessment of cellular and molecular metrics for dose selection in an in vivo comet assay: A case study with MDI.

Authors:  Zhiying Ji; Matthew W Koehler; Andrew B Scott; Matthew J LeBaron
Journal:  Environ Mol Mutagen       Date:  2021-08-26       Impact factor: 3.579

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.