Sebaceous carcinoma is a rare and aggressive skin tumor. It can be located in any area of the body, the most commonly involved area being the periorbital region. It does not entail a typical clinical presentation, which explains the often late diagnosis. The aim of this report is to outline the rarity of the disease and its atypical clinical description, since to this day, inguinal ulcers with clinical manifestation have not been reported. We present and discuss a case of sebaceous carcinoma with an unusual clinical presentation, in an elderly male patient. The precise approach to genital ulcers, as shown in this case, is a diagnostic challenge that requires a great deal of effort on the part of the clinician.
Sebaceous carcinoma is a rare and aggressive skin tumor. It can be located in any area of the body, the most commonly involved area being the periorbital region. It does not entail a typical clinical presentation, which explains the often late diagnosis. The aim of this report is to outline the rarity of the disease and its atypical clinical description, since to this day, inguinal ulcers with clinical manifestation have not been reported. We present and discuss a case of sebaceous carcinoma with an unusual clinical presentation, in an elderly male patient. The precise approach to genital ulcers, as shown in this case, is a diagnostic challenge that requires a great deal of effort on the part of the clinician.
Genital and perigenital ulcers are a common reason for appointments with dermatologists
in daily practice. How to approach them represents an important diagnostic challenge
and, in most cases, they are initially regarded as a sexually transmitted disease (STD).
Currently, this is the main cause mentioned in reports on infectious diseases,
particularly among people aged between 15 and 50.[1] In many countries, algorithms have been developed to treat
urethral syndromes and genital ulcers, based on the local reality. For ulcers that do
not have a history of genital herpes and have endured for more than 4 weeks, the
recommendation is to carry out treatment for chancroid and syphilis, early treatment for
donovanosis, as well as a biopsy. The rationale is to cover all etiological
possibilities, including cancer, taking into consideration the limited
resources.[2]Skin cancer should always be considered a possibility, especially for ulcers that
endure, grow rapidly and/or behave aggressively.[3] The possible types of cancer include, essentially: squamous cell
carcinoma, basal cell carcinoma and melanoma.[4]The following is a case report that was forwarded to our department due to the
possibility of it involving an STD. However, during the case study, the biopsy of the
lesion revealed the presence of moderately differentiated sebaceous carcinoma (SC). A
recent search, drawing on sources such as the Cochrane Library and publications
containing primary information, Medline and Embase, made no reference to inguinal ulcers
as a manifestation of sebaceous carcinoma, rendering the documented case original.
CASE REPORT
A 63-year-old male patient, with a two-year history of painful inguinal mass,
progressively increasing in volume. Subsequently, the inguinal mass to the left
fistulized and the ulcerated lesion grew, reaching 12cm. The pathological background
included reports of pulmonary tuberculosis treated 15 years before. The physical
examination revealed an ulcer in the left inguinal region with malodorous and purulent
exudate containing live larvae; hard right inguinal lymph node, adhered to deep plans,
along with multiple yellowish papules in the posterior region of the penis (Figures 1 and 2). Serology tests were carried out for syphilis, HIV and Chlamydia
trachomatis, as well as screening for acid-alcohol-resistant bacilli and a
PPD exam, and all the tests were negative. A histology of the ulcer's border revealed
atypical cells with prominent nucleoli, eosinophilic cytoplasm with multiple
micro-vacuolizations and atypical mitoses (Figures
3 and 4). A Sudan III test showed
vacuoles containing fat inside the tumoral cells (Figure
5). The immunohistochemical exam came back positive for the epithelial
membrane antigen (EMA) and CK-7. The EMA revealed transmembrane positivity in sebaceous
cells (Figure 6). The biopsies of the papules
located on the penis and the right lymph node, revealed the presence of atypical cells
with similar characteristics. Thus, our diagnostic conclusion was moderately
differentiated sebaceous carcinoma with lymphatic and skin of the penis metastases as
well as secondary myiasis associated with the ulceration brought about by sebaceous
carcinoma. An investigation was conducted to check for Muir-Torre syndrome. A complete
colonoscopy, thorax radiograph and urine analysis did not show any pathological
alterations. The possibility of neoplasias in other organs was explored and then
discarded. However, the abdominal and pelvic computerized axial tomography showed
extensive damage to retroperitoneal lymphatic chains and multiple contralateral inguinal
adenopathies and the tumor inside the deep muscular plan.
FIGURE 1
Ulcer in the left inguinal region, dirty bottom, 12cm in diameter, with live
larvae, and purulent and malodorous exudate. Hard, irregular and unclearly defined
borders
FIGURE 2
Left inguinal ulcer after treatment of larvae
FIGURE 3
Atypical round and polygonal cells with pleomorphic nuclei, prominent nucleoli,
and eosinophilic cytoplasm with microvacuolizations. Presence of atypical mitoses.
(100x)
FIGURE 4
Detail of atypical cells with several intracytoplasmic microvacuolizations
FIGURE 5
Sudan III – vacuoles with lipid content inside the tumoral cells
FIGURE 6
Epithelial membrane antigen (EMA), showing transmembrane positivity of the
sebaceous cells
Ulcer in the left inguinal region, dirty bottom, 12cm in diameter, with live
larvae, and purulent and malodorous exudate. Hard, irregular and unclearly defined
bordersLeft inguinal ulcer after treatment of larvaeAtypical round and polygonal cells with pleomorphic nuclei, prominent nucleoli,
and eosinophilic cytoplasm with microvacuolizations. Presence of atypical mitoses.
(100x)Detail of atypical cells with several intracytoplasmic microvacuolizationsSudan III – vacuoles with lipid content inside the tumoral cellsEpithelial membrane antigen (EMA), showing transmembrane positivity of the
sebaceous cells
DISCUSSION
SC is a malignant tumor, derived from the anexial epithelium of sebaceous glands. It can
emerge in any area of the scalp but most tumors are found on the head and neck,
especially the eyelids.[5,6] Wick et al reported that
25% of sebaceous carcinoma cases are extraocular.[7]Clinical care is not specific, thus delaying diagnosis and affecting prognosis
significantly. Extraocular lesions are described as firm, yellow-pink nodules that grow
slowly and a third of cases present a hemorrhagic surface.To date, it has been described in the following areas: the external auditory canal, oral
mucosa, scalp, vulva, ovarian cysts, parotid, cervix, breasts, lungs, larynx, pharyns,
palmoplantar region, nose, anal margin, penis and saliva glands.[8,9]Its pathogenesis is still unclear. SC has been associated with Muir-Torre syndrome,
infections from the human papillomavirus (HPV) and previous use of diuretics and
radiotherapy.The gold standard for diagnosis is a biopsy and histological examination of the
lesion.[5] Some studies initially
recommend a fine needle aspiration biopsy, achieving good results. However, if these
results come back negative, a biopsy should be performed. The traditional coloring by
hematoxylin-eosin makes diagnosis possible in most cases, though special colorings and
immunohistochemistry might also be necessary. Coloring using Sudan is recommended, which
identifies the lipid content of the interior part of the well-differentiated tumoral
cells.[4] Immunohistochemistry is
recommended to identify primarily the epithelial membrane antigen.[10]Surgery remains the most efficient form of treatment, with margins of 5-6mm,
histopathology and a detailed series of borders of the surgical piece, seeking pagetoid
involvement in relation to its limits.[5] Radiotherapy and chemotherapy should be considered as palliative
treatments in cases where the disease is advanced or has metastasized.[5]As regards prognosis, Rao et al were able to establish the
histopathological characteristics associated with worse results: vascular, lymphatic and
orbital, invasion; involvement of both eyelids; low differentiation, multicentric
origin; duration of over 6 months, tumor diameter of over 10mm; pagetoid invasion and
infiltrative pattern.Garrido et al have shown that extraocular locations seem to have a
better prognosis,[6] based on the lower
rate of metasteses observed. However, extraocular case reports are on the increase,
questioning previous observations, as is the case with our patient.This case was described in order to provide a report on the first patient with this type
of clinical manifestation. Ulcers in this area represent a constant diagnostic
challenge, demanding great efforts to arrive at the correct diagnosis. Our report aims
to draw attention to the presence of neoplasic lesions in this region.