Literature DB >> 24345993

Moral bioenhancement is dangerous.

Nicholas Agar1.   

Abstract

Keywords:  Enhancement

Mesh：

Year:  2013        PMID： 24345993     DOI： 10.1136/medethics-2013-101325

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Med Ethics        ISSN： 0306-6800            Impact factor:   2.903


× No keyword cloud information.
  5 in total

1.  The Artificial Moral Advisor. The "Ideal Observer" Meets Artificial Intelligence.

Authors:  Alberto Giubilini; Julian Savulescu
Journal:  Philos Technol       Date:  2017-12-08

2.  Why a Virtual Assistant for Moral Enhancement When We Could have a Socrates?

Authors:  Francisco Lara
Journal:  Sci Eng Ethics       Date:  2021-06-29       Impact factor: 3.525

Review 3.  The ethical desirability of moral bioenhancement: a review of reasons.

Authors:  Jona Specker; Farah Focquaert; Kasper Raus; Sigrid Sterckx; Maartje Schermer
Journal:  BMC Med Ethics       Date:  2014-09-16       Impact factor: 2.652

4.  Public Attitudes Towards Moral Enhancement. Evidence that Means Matter Morally.

Authors:  Jona Specker; Maartje H N Schermer; Peter B Reiner
Journal:  Neuroethics       Date:  2017-07-27       Impact factor: 1.480

5.  Bioconservatism, bioenhancement and backfiring.

Authors:  Tamara Kayali Browne; Steve Clarke
Journal:  J Moral Educ       Date:  2019-04-01
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.