Literature DB >> 24345603

European transnational ecological deprivation index and participation in population-based breast cancer screening programmes in France.

Samiratou Ouédraogo1, Tienhan Sandrine Dabakuyo-Yonli2, Adrien Roussot3, Carole Pornet4, Nathalie Sarlin5, Philippe Lunaud6, Pascal Desmidt7, Catherine Quantin8, Franck Chauvin9, Vincent Dancourt10, Patrick Arveux11.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: We investigated factors explaining low breast cancer screening programme (BCSP) attendance taking into account a European transnational ecological Deprivation Index. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Data of 13,565 women aged 51-74years old invited to attend an organised mammography screening session between 2010 and 2011 in thirteen French departments were randomly selected. Information on the women's participation in BCSP, their individual characteristics and the characteristics of their area of residence were recorded and analysed in a multilevel model.
RESULTS: Between 2010 and 2012, 7121 (52.5%) women of the studied population had their mammography examination after they received the invitation. Women living in the most deprived neighbourhood were less likely than those living in the most affluent neighbourhood to participate in BCSP (OR 95%CI=0.84[0.78-0.92]) as were those living in rural areas compared with those living in urban areas (OR 95%CI=0.87[0.80-0.95]). Being self-employed (p<0.0001) or living more than 15min away from an accredited screening centre (p=0.02) was also a barrier to participation in BCSP.
CONCLUSION: Despite the classless delivery of BCSP, inequalities in uptake remain. To take advantage of prevention and to avoid exacerbating disparities in cancer mortality, BCSP should be adapted to women's personal and contextual characteristics.
Copyright © 2014 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Breast cancer screening programmes; European Deprivation Index; Mammography screening; Prevention; Screening programme attendance; Socioeconomic inequalities

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 24345603     DOI: 10.1016/j.ypmed.2013.12.007

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Prev Med        ISSN: 0091-7435            Impact factor:   4.018


  16 in total

Review 1.  Interventions to reach underscreened populations: a narrative review for planning cancer screening initiatives.

Authors:  Mavis Jones; Brenda Ross; Alyssa Cloth; Laura Heller
Journal:  Int J Public Health       Date:  2015-02-25       Impact factor: 3.380

2.  Cancer incidence in the AGRICAN cohort study (2005-2011).

Authors:  Clémentine Lemarchand; Séverine Tual; Noémie Levêque-Morlais; Stéphanie Perrier; Aurélien Belot; Michel Velten; Anne-Valérie Guizard; Elisabeth Marcotullio; Alain Monnereau; Bénédicte Clin; Isabelle Baldi; Pierre Lebailly
Journal:  Cancer Epidemiol       Date:  2017-07-11       Impact factor: 2.984

3.  Does the Neighborhood Area of Residence Influence Non-Attendance in an Urban Mammography Screening Program? A Multilevel Study in a Swedish City.

Authors:  Magdalena Lagerlund; Juan Merlo; Raquel Pérez Vicente; Sophia Zackrisson
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-10-13       Impact factor: 3.240

4.  Characteristics of men responding to an invitation to undergo testing for prostate cancer as part of a randomised trial.

Authors:  Eleanor I Walsh; Emma L Turner; J Athene Lane; Jenny L Donovan; David E Neal; Freddie C Hamdy; Richard M Martin
Journal:  Trials       Date:  2016-10-13       Impact factor: 2.279

5.  Ethical Hurdles in the Prioritization of Oncology Care.

Authors:  Folkert de Groot; Stefano Capri; Jean-Claude Castanier; David Cunningham; Bruno Flamion; Mathias Flume; Harald Herholz; Lars-Åke Levin; Oriol Solà-Morales; Christoph J Rupprecht; Natalie Shalet; Andrew Walker; Olivier Wong
Journal:  Appl Health Econ Health Policy       Date:  2017-04       Impact factor: 2.561

6.  Breast cancer subtype of French women is not influenced by socioeconomic status: A population-based-study.

Authors:  Aviane Auguste; Marion Cortet; Tienhan Sandrine Dabakuyo-Yonli; Ludivine Launay; Laurent Arnould; Isabelle Desmoulins; Patrick Roignot; Ariane Darut-Jouve; Marie-Laure Poillot; Aurélie Bertaut; Patrick Arveux
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-02-15       Impact factor: 3.240

7.  Development of a cross-cultural deprivation index in five European countries.

Authors:  Elodie Guillaume; Carole Pornet; Olivier Dejardin; Ludivine Launay; Roberto Lillini; Marina Vercelli; Marc Marí-Dell'Olmo; Amanda Fernández Fontelo; Carme Borrell; Ana Isabel Ribeiro; Maria Fatima de Pina; Alexandra Mayer; Cyrille Delpierre; Bernard Rachet; Guy Launoy
Journal:  J Epidemiol Community Health       Date:  2015-12-11       Impact factor: 3.710

8.  Social inequalities and cancer: can the European deprivation index predict patients' difficulties in health care access? a pilot study.

Authors:  Guillaume Moriceau; Aurélie Bourmaud; Fabien Tinquaut; Mathieu Oriol; Jean-Philippe Jacquin; Pierre Fournel; Nicolas Magné; Franck Chauvin
Journal:  Oncotarget       Date:  2016-01-05

9.  Experiences with Recruitment of Marginalized Groups in a Danish Health Promotion Program: A Document Evaluation Study.

Authors:  Marianne Rasmussen; Eva Kanstrup Poulsen; Anne Stoffersen Rytter; Tine Mechlenborg Kristiansen; Carsten Kronborg Bak
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-06-23       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  Socioeconomic deprivation worsens the outcomes of Italian women with hormone receptor-positive breast cancer and decreases the possibility of receiving standard care.

Authors:  Francesca Di Salvo; Nicola Caranci; Teresa Spadea; Nicolas Zengarini; Pamela Minicozzi; Hade Amash; Mario Fusco; Fabrizio Stracci; Fabio Falcini; Claudia Cirilli; Giuseppina Candela; Rosanna Cusimano; Rosario Tumino; Milena Sant
Journal:  Oncotarget       Date:  2017-07-22
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.