Literature DB >> 24345442

Infection related hospitalizations after prostate biopsy in a statewide quality improvement collaborative.

Paul R Womble1, Maxwell W Dixon2, Susan M Linsell1, Zaojun Ye1, James E Montie1, Brian R Lane3, David C Miller1, Frank N Burks4.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: While transrectal prostate biopsy is the cornerstone of prostate cancer diagnosis, serious post-biopsy infectious complications are reported to be increasing. A better understanding of the true prevalence and microbiology of these events is needed to guide quality improvement in this area and ultimately better early detection practices.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Using data from the MUSIC registry we identified all men who underwent transrectal prostate biopsy at 21 practices in Michigan from March 2012 to June 2013. Trained data abstractors recorded pertinent data including prophylactic antibiotics and all biopsy related hospitalizations. Claims data and followup telephone calls were used for validation. All men admitted to the hospital for an infectious complication were identified and their culture data were obtained. We then compared the frequency of infection related hospitalization rates across practices and according to antibiotic prophylaxis in concordance with AUA best practice recommendations.
RESULTS: The overall 30-day hospital admission rate after prostate biopsy was 0.97%, ranging from 0% to 4.2% across 21 MUSIC practices. Of these hospital admissions 95% were for infectious complications and the majority of cultures identified fluoroquinolone resistant organisms. AUA concordant antibiotics were administered in 96.3% of biopsies. Patients on noncompliant antibiotic regimens were significantly more likely to be hospitalized for infectious complications (3.8% vs 0.89%, p=0.0026).
CONCLUSIONS: Infection related hospitalizations occur in approximately 1% of men undergoing prostate biopsy in Michigan. Our findings suggest that many of these events could be avoided by implementing new protocols (eg culture specific or augmented antibiotic prophylaxis) that adhere to AUA best practice recommendations and address fluoroquinolone resistance.
Copyright © 2014 American Urological Association Education and Research, Inc. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  anti-bacterial agents; biopsy; complications; infection; prostate

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2013        PMID: 24345442     DOI: 10.1016/j.juro.2013.12.026

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Urol        ISSN: 0022-5347            Impact factor:   7.450


  13 in total

Review 1.  The emerging threat of multidrug-resistant Gram-negative bacteria in urology.

Authors:  Hosam M Zowawi; Patrick N A Harris; Matthew J Roberts; Paul A Tambyah; Mark A Schembri; M Diletta Pezzani; Deborah A Williamson; David L Paterson
Journal:  Nat Rev Urol       Date:  2015-09-01       Impact factor: 14.432

Review 2.  Prevalence of infections associated with prostate biopsy.

Authors:  Meena Davuluri; Stacy Loeb
Journal:  Rev Urol       Date:  2014

3.  Extended-spectrum beta-lactamase-producing Enterobacteriaceae in hospital urinary tract infections: incidence and antibiotic susceptibility profile over 9 years.

Authors:  Liam Toner; Nathan Papa; Sani H Aliyu; Harveer Dev; Nathan Lawrentschuk; Samih Al-Hayek
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2015-10-28       Impact factor: 4.226

4.  Is there a need for bacterial endocarditis prophylaxis in patients undergoing urological procedures?

Authors:  Salvatore Patanè
Journal:  J Cardiovasc Transl Res       Date:  2014-02-25       Impact factor: 4.132

5.  Transrectal ultrasound guided prostate biopsy performed by supervised junior and senior residents is safe and does not result in inferior outcomes.

Authors:  Jesse F Wang; Margaret A Knoedler; Kimberly A Maciolek; Natasza M Posielski; Vania Lopez; Wade A Bushman; Sara L Best; Dan R Gralnek; Kyle A Richards
Journal:  Am J Clin Exp Urol       Date:  2021-02-15

6.  Variation in the use of postoperative radiotherapy among high-risk patients following radical prostatectomy.

Authors:  T M Morgan; S R Hawken; K R Ghani; D C Miller; F Y Feng; S M Linsell; J A Salisz; Y Gao; J E Montie; M L Cher
Journal:  Prostate Cancer Prostatic Dis       Date:  2016-03-08       Impact factor: 5.554

7.  The effectiveness of targeted relative to empiric prophylaxis on infectious complications after transrectal ultrasound-guided prostate biopsy: a meta-analysis.

Authors:  Susan Scott; Patrick N Harris; Deborah A Williamson; Michael A Liss; Suhail A R Doi; Matthew J Roberts
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2018-02-16       Impact factor: 4.226

8.  Comparison of Pathological Outcomes for Men with Low Risk Prostate Cancer from Diverse Practice Settings: Similar Results from Immediate Prostatectomy or Initial Surveillance with Delayed Prostatectomy.

Authors:  Gregory B Auffenberg; Susan Linsell; Apoorv Dhir; Stacie N Myers; Bradley Rosenberg; David C Miller
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2016-05-30       Impact factor: 7.450

9.  Evaluation of Patient- and Surgeon-Specific Variations in Patient-Reported Urinary Outcomes 3 Months After Radical Prostatectomy From a Statewide Improvement Collaborative.

Authors:  Gregory B Auffenberg; Ji Qi; Rodney L Dunn; Susan Linsell; Tae Kim; David C Miller; Jeffrey Tosoian; Richard Sarle; William K Johnston; Eduardo Kleer; Khurshid R Ghani; James Montie; James Peabody
Journal:  JAMA Surg       Date:  2021-03-10       Impact factor: 14.766

Review 10.  The past, present, and future of urological quality improvement collaboratives.

Authors:  Adam C Reese; Serge Ginzburg
Journal:  Transl Androl Urol       Date:  2021-05
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.