Literature DB >> 24344265

Carbon residence time dominates uncertainty in terrestrial vegetation responses to future climate and atmospheric CO2.

Andrew D Friend1, Wolfgang Lucht, Tim T Rademacher, Rozenn Keribin, Richard Betts, Patricia Cadule, Philippe Ciais, Douglas B Clark, Rutger Dankers, Pete D Falloon, Akihiko Ito, Ron Kahana, Axel Kleidon, Mark R Lomas, Kazuya Nishina, Sebastian Ostberg, Ryan Pavlick, Philippe Peylin, Sibyll Schaphoff, Nicolas Vuichard, Lila Warszawski, Andy Wiltshire, F Ian Woodward.   

Abstract

Future climate change and increasing atmospheric CO2 are expected to cause major changes in vegetation structure and function over large fractions of the global land surface. Seven global vegetation models are used to analyze possible responses to future climate simulated by a range of general circulation models run under all four representative concentration pathway scenarios of changing concentrations of greenhouse gases. All 110 simulations predict an increase in global vegetation carbon to 2100, but with substantial variation between vegetation models. For example, at 4 °C of global land surface warming (510-758 ppm of CO2), vegetation carbon increases by 52-477 Pg C (224 Pg C mean), mainly due to CO2 fertilization of photosynthesis. Simulations agree on large regional increases across much of the boreal forest, western Amazonia, central Africa, western China, and southeast Asia, with reductions across southwestern North America, central South America, southern Mediterranean areas, southwestern Africa, and southwestern Australia. Four vegetation models display discontinuities across 4 °C of warming, indicating global thresholds in the balance of positive and negative influences on productivity and biomass. In contrast to previous global vegetation model studies, we emphasize the importance of uncertainties in projected changes in carbon residence times. We find, when all seven models are considered for one representative concentration pathway × general circulation model combination, such uncertainties explain 30% more variation in modeled vegetation carbon change than responses of net primary productivity alone, increasing to 151% for non-HYBRID4 models. A change in research priorities away from production and toward structural dynamics and demographic processes is recommended.

Entities:  

Keywords:  DGVM; GVM; ISI-MIP; NPP; turnover

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2013        PMID: 24344265      PMCID: PMC3948236          DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1222477110

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A        ISSN: 0027-8424            Impact factor:   11.205


  7 in total

1.  Atmospheric science. Nitrogen and climate change.

Authors:  Bruce A Hungate; Jeffrey S Dukes; M Rebecca Shaw; Yiqi Luo; Christopher B Field
Journal:  Science       Date:  2003-11-28       Impact factor: 47.728

Review 2.  Vegetation dynamics--simulating responses to climatic change.

Authors:  F I Woodward; M R Lomas
Journal:  Biol Rev Camb Philos Soc       Date:  2004-08

3.  Multiple mechanisms of Amazonian forest biomass losses in three dynamic global vegetation models under climate change.

Authors:  David Galbraith; Peter E Levy; Stephen Sitch; Chris Huntingford; Peter Cox; Mathew Williams; Patrick Meir
Journal:  New Phytol       Date:  2010-08       Impact factor: 10.151

4.  The Inter-Sectoral Impact Model Intercomparison Project (ISI-MIP): project framework.

Authors:  Lila Warszawski; Katja Frieler; Veronika Huber; Franziska Piontek; Olivia Serdeczny; Jacob Schewe
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2013-12-16       Impact factor: 11.205

5.  Predictive models of forest dynamics.

Authors:  Drew Purves; Stephen Pacala
Journal:  Science       Date:  2008-06-13       Impact factor: 47.728

6.  A large and persistent carbon sink in the world's forests.

Authors:  Yude Pan; Richard A Birdsey; Jingyun Fang; Richard Houghton; Pekka E Kauppi; Werner A Kurz; Oliver L Phillips; Anatoly Shvidenko; Simon L Lewis; Josep G Canadell; Philippe Ciais; Robert B Jackson; Stephen W Pacala; A David McGuire; Shilong Piao; Aapo Rautiainen; Stephen Sitch; Daniel Hayes
Journal:  Science       Date:  2011-07-14       Impact factor: 47.728

7.  Influences of forest structure, climate and species composition on tree mortality across the eastern US.

Authors:  Emily R Lines; David A Coomes; Drew W Purves
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2010-10-13       Impact factor: 3.240

  7 in total
  45 in total

1.  The elephant, the blind, and the intersectoral intercomparison of climate impacts.

Authors:  Hans Joachim Schellnhuber; Katja Frieler; Pavel Kabat
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2013-12-17       Impact factor: 11.205

2.  Impact of mesophyll diffusion on estimated global land CO2 fertilization.

Authors:  Ying Sun; Lianhong Gu; Robert E Dickinson; Richard J Norby; Stephen G Pallardy; Forrest M Hoffman
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2014-10-13       Impact factor: 11.205

3.  Effect of increasing CO2 on the terrestrial carbon cycle.

Authors:  David Schimel; Britton B Stephens; Joshua B Fisher
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2014-12-29       Impact factor: 11.205

4.  Long-term decline of the Amazon carbon sink.

Authors:  R J W Brienen; O L Phillips; T R Feldpausch; E Gloor; T R Baker; J Lloyd; G Lopez-Gonzalez; A Monteagudo-Mendoza; Y Malhi; S L Lewis; R Vásquez Martinez; M Alexiades; E Álvarez Dávila; P Alvarez-Loayza; A Andrade; L E O C Aragão; A Araujo-Murakami; E J M M Arets; L Arroyo; G A Aymard C; O S Bánki; C Baraloto; J Barroso; D Bonal; R G A Boot; J L C Camargo; C V Castilho; V Chama; K J Chao; J Chave; J A Comiskey; F Cornejo Valverde; L da Costa; E A de Oliveira; A Di Fiore; T L Erwin; S Fauset; M Forsthofer; D R Galbraith; E S Grahame; N Groot; B Hérault; N Higuchi; E N Honorio Coronado; H Keeling; T J Killeen; W F Laurance; S Laurance; J Licona; W E Magnussen; B S Marimon; B H Marimon-Junior; C Mendoza; D A Neill; E M Nogueira; P Núñez; N C Pallqui Camacho; A Parada; G Pardo-Molina; J Peacock; M Peña-Claros; G C Pickavance; N C A Pitman; L Poorter; A Prieto; C A Quesada; F Ramírez; H Ramírez-Angulo; Z Restrepo; A Roopsind; A Rudas; R P Salomão; M Schwarz; N Silva; J E Silva-Espejo; M Silveira; J Stropp; J Talbot; H ter Steege; J Teran-Aguilar; J Terborgh; R Thomas-Caesar; M Toledo; M Torello-Raventos; R K Umetsu; G M F van der Heijden; P van der Hout; I C Guimarães Vieira; S A Vieira; E Vilanova; V A Vos; R J Zagt
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2015-03-19       Impact factor: 49.962

5.  How functional traits influence plant growth and shade tolerance across the life cycle.

Authors:  Daniel S Falster; Remko A Duursma; Richard G FitzJohn
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2018-06-29       Impact factor: 11.205

6.  Global covariation of carbon turnover times with climate in terrestrial ecosystems.

Authors:  Nuno Carvalhais; Matthias Forkel; Myroslava Khomik; Jessica Bellarby; Martin Jung; Mirco Migliavacca; Mingquan Mu; Sassan Saatchi; Maurizio Santoro; Martin Thurner; Ulrich Weber; Bernhard Ahrens; Christian Beer; Alessandro Cescatti; James T Randerson; Markus Reichstein
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2014-09-24       Impact factor: 49.962

7.  Land-use and climate change risks in the Amazon and the need of a novel sustainable development paradigm.

Authors:  Carlos A Nobre; Gilvan Sampaio; Laura S Borma; Juan Carlos Castilla-Rubio; José S Silva; Manoel Cardoso
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2016-09-16       Impact factor: 11.205

8.  Partitioning direct and indirect effects reveals the response of water-limited ecosystems to elevated CO2.

Authors:  Simone Fatichi; Sebastian Leuzinger; Athanasios Paschalis; J Adam Langley; Alicia Donnellan Barraclough; Mark J Hovenden
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2016-10-24       Impact factor: 11.205

9.  The decadal state of the terrestrial carbon cycle: Global retrievals of terrestrial carbon allocation, pools, and residence times.

Authors:  A Anthony Bloom; Jean-François Exbrayat; Ivar R van der Velde; Liang Feng; Mathew Williams
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2016-01-19       Impact factor: 11.205

10.  Net carbon flux of dead wood in forests of the Eastern US.

Authors:  C W Woodall; M B Russell; B F Walters; A W D'Amato; S Fraver; G M Domke
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  2014-11-28       Impact factor: 3.225

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.